Blockchain and Trust in the Wine Industry: Consumer Perceptions and Supply Chain Transparency-Journal of Sustainability Research-CSCIED科技核心评价数据库-手机版

Blockchain and Trust in the Wine Industry: Consumer Perceptions and Supply Chain Transparency

Blockchain and Trust in the Wine Industry: Consumer Perceptions and Supply Chain Transparency

ES评分 0 浏览量：131 下载量：0

DOI	10.20900/jsr20260005
刊名	Journal of Sustainability Research JSR
年，卷(期)	2026, 8(1)
作者	João Conceição,Jorge Gomes,Rui Guedes,Mário Romão*,
作者单位	Lisbon School of Economics & Management, University of Lisbon, Lisboa 1200-781, Portugal ;
摘要	This study explores consumer perceptions of how blockchain technology (BCT) may contribute to trust, transparency, and authenticity in the wine supply chain. Employing a mixed-methods design, the research combines a systematic literature review with a quantitative consumer survey and qualitative interviews. The primary empirical focus is on wine consumers, complemented by contextual insights from a limited number of producers, distributors, and industry experts. The findings indicate that while consumer awareness of BCT is relatively low, the technology is commonly perceived as enhancing traceability, reducing counterfeiting, and increasing confidence in product authenticity. Importantly, the study does not assess the technical performance or implementation outcomes of blockchain systems, but rather examines how such technologies are understood and evaluated by consumers. By foregrounding perception rather than functionality, the study highlights the central role of consumer trust in shaping the potential adoption of blockchain-based solutions and provides an exploratory foundation for future research involving broader stakeholder samples and empirical implementation analysis.
Abstract	This study explores consumer perceptions of how blockchain technology (BCT) may contribute to trust, transparency, and authenticity in the wine supply chain. Employing a mixed-methods design, the research combines a systematic literature review with a quantitative consumer survey and qualitative interviews. The primary empirical focus is on wine consumers, complemented by contextual insights from a limited number of producers, distributors, and industry experts. The findings indicate that while consumer awareness of BCT is relatively low, the technology is commonly perceived as enhancing traceability, reducing counterfeiting, and increasing confidence in product authenticity. Importantly, the study does not assess the technical performance or implementation outcomes of blockchain systems, but rather examines how such technologies are understood and evaluated by consumers. By foregrounding perception rather than functionality, the study highlights the central role of consumer trust in shaping the potential adoption of blockchain-based solutions and provides an exploratory foundation for future research involving broader stakeholder samples and empirical implementation analysis.
关键词	blockchain implementation; wine supply chain; trust; traceability; transparency; wine stakeholders; wine industry
KeyWord	blockchain implementation; wine supply chain; trust; traceability; transparency; wine stakeholders; wine industry
基金项目
页码	-

参考文献
相关文献

1.Tokkozhina U, Ferreira J, Martins A. Wine traceability and counterfeit reduction: blockchain-based application for a wine supply chain. In: Intelligent transport systems. Cham (Switzerland): Springer; 2022. p. 59-70. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-97603-3_5.

2.Pinto I. Portugal perde 19 milhões só com falsificações de vinho. Lisboa (Portugal): Diário de Notícias; 2016.

3.Gardner TA, Benzie M, Börner J, Dawkins E, Fick S, Garrett R, et al. Transparency and sustainability in global commodity supply chains. World Dev. 2019;121:163-77. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.05.025.

4.Sun X, Zhang F, Gutiérrez-Gamboa G, Ge Q, Xu P, Zhang Q, et al. Real wine or not? Protecting wine with traceability and authenticity for consumers: chemical and technical basis, technique applications, challenges, and perspectives. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2021;62(24):6783-808. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2021.1906624.

5.Tatineni S. Blockchain and data science integration for secure and transparent data sharing. Int J Adv Res Eng Technol (IJARET). 2019;10(3):470-80.

6.Reyna A, Martín C, Chen J, Soler E, Díaz M. On blockchain and its integration with IoT: challenges and opportunities. Future Gener Comput Syst. 2018;88:173-90. doi: 10.1016/j.future.2018.05.046.

7.Grand View Research. Wine market size, share & trends analysis report by product (table wine, dessert wine, sparkling wine), by distribution channel (on-trade, off-trade), by region, and segment forecasts, 2021–2028. San Francisco (CA, US): Grand View Research; 2021.

8.Anderson K, Norman D, Wittwer G. Globalisation of the world’s wine markets. In: The international economics of wine. Oxford (UK): Blackwell Publishing Ltd.; 2019. p. 27-50. doi: 10.1142/9789811202094_0002.

9.Brito C, Pereira S, Martins S, Monteiro A, Moutinho-Pereira JM, Dinis L. Strategies for achieving the sustainable development goals across the wine chain: a review. Front Sustain Food Syst. 2024;8:1437872. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2024.1437872.

10.Popović T, Krčo S, Maraš V, Hakola L, Radonjić S, van Kranenburg R, et al. A novel solution for counterfeit prevention in the wine industry based on IoT, smart tags, and crowd-sourced information. Internet of Things. 2021;14:100375. doi: 10.1016/j.iot.2021.100375.

11.Wajsman N, Burgos CA, Davies C. The economic cost of IPR infringement in spirits and wine. Alicante (Spain): European Union Intellectual Property Office; 2016.

12.Wilkes E, Day M, Herderich M, Johnson D. AWRI reports: in vino veritas—investigating technologies to fight wine fraud. Wine & Viticulture J. 2016;31(2):36-8.

13.Alston JM, Gaeta D. Reflections on the political economy of European wine appellations. Ital Econ J. 2021;7:219-58. doi: 10.1007/s40797-021-00145-4.

14.Parry G, Revolidis I, Ellul J, Pace G. Bottling up trust: a review of blockchain adoption in wine supply chain traceability. IEEE Access. 2024;12:178320-44. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3505428.

15.Chandra R, Moschini G. Product differentiation and the relative importance of wine attributes: U.S. retail prices. J Wine Econ. 2022;17:177-208. doi: 10.1017/jwe.2022.23.

16.Pomarici E, Sardone R. Is a new EU wine policy coming? The unexpected role of regulatory measures. Wine Econ Policy. 2022;11(2):75-82. doi: 10.36253/wep-13189.

17.Finck M. Blockchain and the General Data Protection Regulation. Eur Parliamentary Res Serv. 2019. doi: 10.2861/535. Available from: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2019/634445/EPRS_STU(2019)634445_EN.pdf. Accessed on 13 Mar 2023

18.Malisic B, Misic N, Krco S, Martinovic A, Tinaj S, Popovic T. Blockchain adoption in the wine supply chain: a systematic literature review. Sustainability. 2023;15(19):14408. doi: 10.3390/su151914408.

19.Psychogiou E-E, Tsoulfas GT. Critical factors affecting trust in the wine supply chain in Greece: a grey DEMATEL approach. Logistics. 2024;8(1):24. doi: 10.3390/logistics8010024.

20.Christaki T, Tzia C. Quality and safety assurance in winemaking. Food Control. 2002;13(8):503-17. doi:10.1016/S0956-7135(02)00030-0.

21.Adamashvili N, Zhizhilashvili N, Tricase C. The integration of the Internet of things, artificial intelligence, and blockchain technology for advancing the wine supply chain. Computers. 2024;13(3):72. doi: 10.3390/computers13030072.

22.Bastard A, Chaillet A. Digitalization from vine to wine: successes and remaining challenges—A review. BIO Web Conf. 2023;68:01034. doi: 10.1051/bioconf/20236801034.

23.Nakamoto S. Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system. 2008. Available from: https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf. Accessed on 23 Sept 2023.

24.Yaga D, Mell P, Roby N, Scarfone K. Blockchain technology overview. Gaithersburg (MD, US): Department of Commerce USA, National Institute of Standards and Technology; 2018. doi: 10.6028/NIST.IR.8202.

25.Laurence T. Blockchain for dummies. Hoboken (NJ, US): John Wiley & Sons; 2019.

26.Kshetri N. Blockchain. In: Kshetri N, editor. Fourth revolution and the bottom four billion: making technologies work for the poor. Ann Arbor (MI, US): University of Michigan Press; 2023. p. 72-102.

27.Viriyasitavat W, Hoonsopon D. Blockchain characteristics and consensus in modern business processes. J Ind Inform Integr. 2019;13:32-9.

28.Treiblmaier H. The impact of the blockchain on the supply chain: a theory-based research framework and a call for action. Supply Chain Manag. 2018;23(6):545-59. doi: 10.1108/SCM-01-2018-0029.

29.Sapra N, Shaikh I, Dash A. Impact of Proof of Work (PoW)-based blockchain applications on the environment: a systematic review and research agenda. J Risk Financ Manag. 2023;16(4):218. doi: 10.3390/jrfm16040218.

30.Attaran M, Gunasekaran A. The evolution of blockchain. Berlin (Germany): Springer; 2019. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-27798-7.

31.Iansiti M, Lakhani KR. The truth about blockchain. Harv Bus Rev. 2017;95(1):118-27.

32.Mattke J, Maier C, Hund A, Weitzel T. How an enterprise blockchain application in the U.S. pharmaceuticals supply chain is saving lives. MIS Q Exec. 2019;18:6. doi: 10.17705/2msqe.00019.

33.Mohamed A, Alkhateeb Y, Agarwal P, Abdelwahab A, Ragab A, Abu-Salim T. Characteristics of blockchain and smart services for smart governments: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Project Manag. 2022;10:30-55. doi: 10.12821/ijispm100302.

34.Khan MZ, Kumar A, Sahu AK. Blockchain applications in supply chain management: a systematic review of reviews. Glob Knowl Mem Commun. 2025;74(3/4):1191-208. doi: 10.1108/GKMC-12-2022-0296.

35.Wang Y, Singgih M, Wang J, Rit M. Making sense of blockchain technology: how will it transform supply chains? Int J Prod Econ. 2019;211:221-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.02.002.

36.Alladi T, Chamola V, Parizi RM, Choo KKR. Blockchain applications for Industry 4.0 and industrial IoT: a review. IEEE Access. 2019;7:176935-51. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2956748.

37.Xu P, Lee J, Barth JR, Richey RG. Blockchain as supply chain technology: considering transparency and security. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag. 2021;51(3):305-24. doi: 10.1108/IJPDLM-08-2019-0234.

38.Heussner J, Kramer MP, Hanf J. Verified vintages: leveraging blockchain to stop wine fraud. BIO Web Conf. 2023;68:7. doi: 10.1051/bioconf/20236803024.

39.European Commission. Smart tags driven service platform for enabling ecosystems of connected. Brussel (Belgium): European Commission; 2019. doi: 10.3030/688061.

40.Vaigandla KK, Siluveru M, Kesoju M, Karne R. Review on blockchain technology: architecture, characteristics, benefits, algorithms, challenges, and applications. Mesopot J Cyber Secur. 2023;2023:73-84. doi: 10.58496/MJCS/2023/012.

41.Krosnick J, Holbrook A, Berent M, Carson R, Hanemann M, Kopp R, et al. The impact of “no opinion” response options on data quality—non-attitude reduction or an invitation to satisfice? Public Opin Q. 2002;66:371-403.

42.Rajasekar D, Verma R. Research methodology. Karnataka (India): Archers & Elevators Publishing House; 2023.

43.Skinner R, Nelson RR, Chin WW, Land L. The Delphi method research strategy in studies of information systems. Commun Assoc Inf Syst. 2015;37(1):2. doi: 10.17705/1CAIS.03702.

44.Agnusdei G, Coluccia B, Elia V, Miglietta P. IoT technologies for wine supply chain traceability: potential application in the southern Apulia region (Italy). Procedia Comput Sci. 2022;200:1125-34. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.312.

45.Galati A, Vrontis D, Giorlando B, Giacomarra M, Crescimanno M. Exploring the common blockchain adoption enablers: the case of three Italian wineries. Int J Wine Bus Res. 2021;33(4):578-96. doi: 10.1108/IJWBR-10-2020-0050.

46.Biswas K, Muthukkumarasamy V, Tan WL. Blockchain based wine supply chain traceability. In: Future Technologies Conference (FTC); 2017 Nov 29-30; Vancouver, Canada. p. 56-62.

47.Evans JR, Mathur A. The value of online surveys. Internet Res. 2005;15(2):195-219. doi: 10.1108/10662240510590360

48.Vizaad A, Norman AA, Azzuhri SR. Characteristics of blockchain and its relationship with trust. In: 2022 IEEE Global Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Internet of Things (GCAIoT); 2022 Dec 18-21; Alamein New City, Egypt. p. 76-81. doi: 10.1109/GCAIoT57150.2022.10019153.

49.Tavakol M, Wetzel A. Factor analysis: a means for theory and instrument development in support of construct validity. Int J Med Educ. 2020;11:245-7. doi: 10.5116/ijme.5f96.0f4a.

50.Rossoni L, Engelbert R, Bellegard NL. Normal science and its tools: reviewing the effects of exploratory factor analysis in management. Rev Admin. 2016;51(2):198-211. doi: 10.5700/rausp1234.

51.Kaiser H. An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika. 1974;39:31-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02291575.

52.Hooper D. Exploratory factor analysis. In: Hooper D, editor. Approaches to quantitative research—theory and its practical application: a guide to dissertation students. Cork (Ireland): Oak Tree Press; 2012.

53.Samuels P. Advice on exploratory factor analysis. Available from: https://www.open-access.bcu.ac.uk/id/eprint/6076. Accessed on 12 Aug 2023.

54.Taber KS. The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Res Sci Educ. 2018;48:1273-96. doi: 10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2.

55.Kuen L, Westmattelmann D, Bruckes M, Schewe G. Who earns trust in online environments? A meta-analysis of trust in technology and trust in provider for technology acceptance. Electron Markets. 2023;33(1):61. doi: 10.1007/s12525-023-00672-1.

56.Kumari N, Chahal H. Consumer perceived value: the development of a multiple item scale in hospitals in the Indian context. Int J Pharm Healthcare Mark. 2012;6:167-90. doi: 10.1108/17506121211243086.

57.Mishra P, Singh U, Pandey CM, Mishra P, Pandey G. Application of Student’s t-test, analysis of variance, and covariance. Ann Cardiac Anaesth. 2019;22(4):407-11. doi: 10.4103/aca.ACA_94_19.

58.Grechi D, Pavione E, Gazzola P, Cardini F. Tradition and innovation in the Italian wine industry: the best practices of Casa Paladin. Sustainability. 2024;16(7):2857. doi: 10.3390/su16072857.

59.Wannenwetsch K, Ostermann I, Priel R, Gerschner F, Theissler A. Blockchain for supply chain management: a literature review and open challenges. Procedia Comput Sci. 2023;225:1312-21. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2023.10.119.

60.Godau R. Qualitative data analysis software: MAXqda. Qual Res J. 2004;4:66-72.

61.Kuckartz U, Rädiker S. Analyzing qualitative data with MAXQDA. Cham (Switzerland): Springer; 2019. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-15671-8.

62.Lustenberger M, Malešević S, Spychiger F. Ecosystem readiness: blockchain adoption is driven externally. Front Blockchain. 2021;4:720454. doi: 10.3389/fbloc.2021.720454.

63.Beck R. Beyond bitcoin: the rise of the blockchain world. Computer. 2018;51:54-8. doi: 10.1109/MC.2018.1451660.

64.Cuel R, Cangelosi G. In vino veritas? Blockchain preliminary effects on Italian wine SMEs. In: Ceravolo P, Russo B, Caneva E, editors. Data science for economics and finance. Berlin (Germany): Springer; 2020. p. 339-50. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-47355-6_20.

引用本文

João Conceição,Jorge Gomes,Rui Guedes,Mário Romão*. Blockchain and Trust in the Wine Industry: Consumer Perceptions and Supply Chain Transparency [J]. Journal of Sustainability Research. 2026; 8; (1). - .

文献评论

相关学者

相关机构