Sustainable Human Resource Management and Leadership as Drivers of Competitive Performance: A Study on Sustainable Practices and Knowledge Management in Family Firms-Journal of Sustainability Research-CSCIED科技核心评价数据库-手机版

Sustainable Human Resource Management and Leadership as Drivers of Competitive Performance: A Study on Sustainable Practices and Knowledge Management in Family Firms

Sustainable Human Resource Management and Leadership as Drivers of Competitive Performance: A Study on Sustainable Practices and Knowledge Management in Family Firms

ES评分 0 浏览量：189 下载量：0

全文阅读下载引用收藏

DOI	10.20900/jsr20250072
刊名	Journal of Sustainability Research JSR
年，卷(期)	2025, 7(4)
作者	Camilo Giraldo-Giraldo*,Johnatan Castro-Gómez,Santiago Gutiérrez-Broncano,Víctor Alfonso Sánchez Montoya,
作者单位	Faculty of Legal and Social Science, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo 45071, Spain ; Faculty of Business Sciences and Economics, Tecnológico de Antioquia Institución Universitaria, Medellin 050041, Colombia ; Faculty of Social Sciences and Information Technologie, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Talavera de la Reina 45600, Spain ; Faculty of Communication Science, University of Antioquia, Medellín 500001, Colombia ;
摘要	This study analyses the impact of Sustainable Human Resource Management (SHRM) and Sustainable Leadership (SL) on competitive performance (CP) in Colombian coffee family firms (FF), considering Sustainable Practices (SP) as mediators and Knowledge Management (KM) as a moderator. Using a quantitative design and Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) on 232 valid responses, results confirm that SHRM and SL indirectly enhance CP through SP, while KM strengthens this mediation. The findings highlight that economic and environmental practices exert stronger effects than social ones. These results provide empirical evidence from Latin American rural contexts and propose a systemic framework linking SHRM, SL, SP, and KM as drivers of CP in family firm.
Abstract	This study analyses the impact of Sustainable Human Resource Management (SHRM) and Sustainable Leadership (SL) on competitive performance (CP) in Colombian coffee family firms (FF), considering Sustainable Practices (SP) as mediators and Knowledge Management (KM) as a moderator. Using a quantitative design and Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) on 232 valid responses, results confirm that SHRM and SL indirectly enhance CP through SP, while KM strengthens this mediation. The findings highlight that economic and environmental practices exert stronger effects than social ones. These results provide empirical evidence from Latin American rural contexts and propose a systemic framework linking SHRM, SL, SP, and KM as drivers of CP in family firm.
关键词	Sustainable Human Resource Management-(SHRM); Sustainable Leadership-(SL); Competitive Performance-(CP); Coffee Family Firms; Sustainable Practices-(SP); Knowledge Management-(KM)
KeyWord	Sustainable Human Resource Management-(SHRM); Sustainable Leadership-(SL); Competitive Performance-(CP); Coffee Family Firms; Sustainable Practices-(SP); Knowledge Management-(KM)
基金项目
页码	-

参考文献
相关文献

1.Qorri D, Pergéné Szabó E, Felföldi J, Kovács K. The role of human resource management in agricultural labor saving technologies: An integrative review and science mapping. Agriculture. 2024;14(7):1144. doi: 10.3390/agriculture14071144.

2.Ehnert I, Parsa S, Roper I, Wagner M, Müller-Camen M. Reporting on sustainability and HRM: A comparative study of sustainability reporting practices by the world’s largest companies. Int J Hum Resour Manag. 2015;27(1):88-108. doi: 10.1080/09585192.2015.1024157.

3.Ejibe I, Okoye CC, Nwankwo EE, Nwankwo TC, Scholastica UC. Eco sustainable practices through strategic HRM: A review and framework for SMES in the creative industries. World J Adv Res Rev. 2024;21(3):42-9. doi: 10.30574/wjarr.2024.21.3.0658.

4.Bučiūnienė I, Goštautaitė B. The role of sustainable HRM in mitigating the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on employee well-being in education. Int J Public Admin. 2025; Epub ahead of print. doi: 10.1080/01900692.2025.2451386.

5.Aliyev J. Strategic human resource management (SHRM) and competitive advantage. SSRN. 2024; Epub ahead of print. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4772231.

6.Iqbal S, Ahmad M, Nasir N, Khan MM. A systematic review of sustainable leadership. Sustain Dev. 2020a;28(4):1081-95. doi: 10.1002/sd.2062.

7.Ahsan MJ, Khawaja S. Sustainable leadership impact on environmental performance: Exploring employee well being, innovation, and organizational resilience. Discov Sustain. 2024;5(1):317. doi: 10.1007/s43621-024-00422-z.

8.Faisal M. Sustainable leadership and firm performance: A mediating role of green HRM. J Clean Prod. 2023;412:137289. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137289.

9.Boeske J. Leadership towards sustainability: A review of sustainable, sustainability and environmental leadership approaches. Sustainability. 2023;15(16):12626. doi: 10.3390/su151612626.

10.Nisha NT, Nawaz N, Mahalakshmi J, Gajenderan V, Hasani IA. A study on the impact of sustainable leadership and core competencies on sustainable competitive advantage in the information technology (IT) sector. Sustainability. 2022;14(11):6899. doi: 10.3390/su14116899.

11.Li N, Yao Q, Tang H, Lu Y. Is digitalization necessary? Configuration of supply chain capabilities for improving enterprise competitive performance. J Bus Res. 2025;186:114972. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114972.

12.Mustafa K, Hossain MB, Ahmad F, Ejaz F, Khan HGA, Dunay A. Green human resource management practices to accomplish green competitive advantage: A moderated mediation model. Heliyon. 2023;9(11):e21830. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21830.

13.Kim TT, Kim WG, Majeed S, Haldorai K. Does green human resource management lead to a green competitive advantage? A sequential mediation model with three mediators. Int J Hospit Manag. 2023;111:103486. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2023.103486.

14.Stahl GK, Brewster CJ, Collings DG, Hajro A. Enhancing the role of human resource management in corporate sustainability and social responsibility: A multi stakeholder, multidimensional approach to HRM. Hum Resour Manag Rev. 2020;30(3):100708. doi: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.100708.

15.Rojas Ospina A, Zuñiga Collazos A, Castillo Palacio M. Factors influencing environmental sustainability performance: A study applied to coffee crops in colombia. J Open Innov Technol Mark Complex. 2024;10(3):100361. doi: 10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100361.

16.Tegethoff T, Santa R, Bucheli JM, Cabrera B, Scavarda A. Sustainable development through eco innovation: A focus on small and medium enterprises in Colombia. PLoS ONE. 2025;20(1):e0316620. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316620.

17.Guerci M, Hauff S, Panichella N, Radaelli G. Sustainable HRM and class based inequality. Pers Rev. 2022;52(5):1597-613. doi: 10.1108/PR-10-2021-0772.

18.Kramar R. Sustainable human resource management: Six defining characteristics. Asia Pac J Hum Resour. 2022;60(1):146-70. doi: 10.1111/1744-7941.12321.

19.Chege SM, Wang D. The influence of technology innovation on SME performance through environmental sustainability practices in Kenya. Technol Soc. 2020;60:101210. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101210.

20.Casprini E, Palumbo R, De Massis A. Untangling the yarn: A contextualization of human resource management to the family firm setting. J Fam Bus Strateg. 2024;15(3):100621. doi: 10.1016/j.jfbs.2024.100621.

21.Paillé P. Green human resource management in family businesses: Exploring economic performance implications. Entrep Reg Dev. 2024;36(7-8):527-47. doi: 10.1080/08985626.2024.2404037.

22.Iqbal Q, Piwowar Sulej K. Sustainable leadership, environmental turbulence, resilience, and employees’ well being in SMES. Front Psychol. 2022;13:939389. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.939389.

23.Liao Y. Sustainable leadership: A literature review and prospects. Front Psychol. 2022;13:1045570. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1045570.

24.Tantry A, Gilani SAM, Al Sabbah S, Sitinjak C, Khan N, Mulla T, et al. Sustainable leadership styles adopted by small businesses in the UAE during and post COVID-19. Discov Sustain. 2025;6:570. doi: 10.1007/s43621-025-01426-z.

25.Iqbal S, Litvaj I, Drbúl M, Rasheed M. Improving quality of human resources through HRM practices and knowledge sharing. Admin Sci. 2023;13(10):224. doi: 10.3390/admsci13100224.

26.Navajas Romero V, Ceular Villamandos N, Pérez Priego MA, Caridad López del Río L. Sustainable human resource management: The mediating role between work engagement and teamwork performance. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(8):e0271134. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271134.

27.De Souza Barbosa A, Crispim da Silva MCB, Bueno da Silva L, Morioka SN, Fernandes de Souza V. Integration of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) criteria: Their impacts on corporate sustainability performance. Hum Soc Sci Commun. 2023;10:410. doi: 10.1057/s41599-023-01919-0.

28.González-Ramos MI, Guadamillas F, Donate MJ. The relationship between knowledge management strategies and corporate social responsibility: Effects on innovation capabilities. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2023;188(C):122287. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122287.

29.Del Giudice M, Della Peruta MR. The impact of knowledge management on corporate social responsibility. J Knowl Manag. 2016;20(3):1-23. doi: 10.1108/JKM-12-2014-0493.

30.Martínez-Falcó J, Marco-Lajara B, Zaragoza-Sáez P, Sánchez-García E. The effect of knowledge management on sustainable performance: Evidence from the Spanish wine industry. Knowl Manag Res Pract. 2024;22(3):298-313. doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2023.2218045.

31.León Gómez A, Santos Jaén JM, Palacios Manzano M, Garza Sánchez HH. Unlocking sustainable competitive advantage: Sustainably oriented practices and SMES performance in the tourism sector. J Clean Prod. 2025; Epub ahead of print. doi: 10.1007/s10668-023-04025-y.

32.Radu-Lefebvre M. Legacy in family business: A systematic literature review. Fam Bus Rev. 2024;37(1):3-21. doi: 10.1177/08944865231224506.

33.Kramar R. Beyond strategic human resource management: Is sustainable human resource management the next approach? Int J Hum Resour Manag. 2014;25(8):1069-89. doi: 10.1080/09585192.2013.816863.

34.Lu Y, Zhang MM, Yang MM, Wang Y. Sustainable human resource management practices, employee resilience, and employee outcomes: Toward common good values. Hum Resour Manag. 2023;62(3):331-53. doi: 10.1002/hrm.22153.

35.Iqbal Q, Ahmad NH, Li Z, Li Y. To walk in beauty: Sustainable leadership, frugal innovation and environmental performance. Manag Decis Econ. 2022b;43(3):738-50. doi: 10.1002/mde.3415.

36.Sajjad A, Eweje G, Raziq MM. Sustainability leadership: An integrative review and conceptual synthesis. Bus Strateg Environ. 2024; Epub ahead of print. doi: 10.1002/bse.3631.

37.Khaskhely A, Muneer S, Haider SA, Riaz H. Understanding the impact of green human resource management practices and dynamic sustainable capabilities on corporate sustainable performance: Evidence from the manufacturing sector. Front Psychol. 2022;13:844488. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.844488.

38.Barney J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manag. 1991;17(1):99-120. doi: 10.1177/014920639101700108.

39.Singh SK, Del Giudice M, Chierici R, Graziano D. Green innovation and environmental performance: The role of green transformational leadership and green human resource management. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2020;150:119762. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119762.

40.Michiels A, Arijs D, Uhlaner LM. Formal HRM in family SMES: The role of family-centered goals and family governance. Rev Manag Sci. 2022;16(8):2553-76. doi: 10.1007/s11846-021-00509-1.

41.Iqbal Q, Ahmad NH. How does sustainable leadership influence sustainable performance? Empirical evidence from selected Asean countries. SAGE Open. 2020b;10(4):2158244020969394. doi: 10.1177/2158244020969394.

42.Kutaula S, Matthews B, Müller Camen M. Linking HRM with sustainability performance: The moderating role of employee sustainability participation and long term orientation. Br J Manag. 2024; Epub ahead of print. doi: 10.1111/1467-8551.12861.

43.Oduro S. Effect of social and environmental sustainability on SME competitiveness: A meta analysis of empirical studies. Eur Bus Rev. 2025; Epub ahead of print. doi: 10.1007/s11301-025-00519-3.

44.Burawat P. The relationships among transformational leadership, sustainable leadership, lean manufacturing and sustainability performance in Thai SMES manufacturing industry. Int J Qual Reliab Manag. 2019;36(6):1014-36. doi: 10.1108/IJQRM-09-2017-0178.

45.Wu Y, Awang SR, Ahmad T. Leadership styles, employee green behavior, and sustainable performance: The role of sustainable leadership in integrating transformational and ethical leadership dimensions. Environ Dev Sustain. 2025; Epub ahead of print. doi: 10.1007/s10668-025-06573-x.

46.Abdeen H, De-Pablos-Heredero C, Cosculluela-Martinez C, Montes-Botella JL. Strategic leadership and its impact on dynamic capabilities and sustainable competitive advantages. Manag Decis. 2025; Epub ahead of print. doi: 10.1108/MD-07-2024-1682.

47.Alqatan A, Simmou W, Shehadeh M, AlReshaid F, Elmarzouky M, Shohaieb D. Strategic pathways to corporate sustainability: The roles of transformational leadership, knowledge sharing, and innovation. Sustainability. 2025;17(12):5547. doi: 10.3390/su17125547.

48.Tyler BB, Lahneman B, Cerrato D, Cruz AD, Beukel K, Spielmann N, et al. Environmental practice adoption in SMES: The effects of firm proactive orientation and regulatory pressure. J Small Bus Manag. 2024;62(5):2211-46. doi: 10.1080/00472778.2023.2218435.

49.Davis JH, Schoorman FD, Donaldson L. Toward a stewardship theory of management. Acad Manag Rev. 1997;22(1):20-47. doi: 10.5465/amr.1997.9707180258.

50.Miller D, Le Breton-Miller I. Family governance and firm performance: Agency, stewardship, and capabilities. Fam Bus Rev. 2006;19(1):73-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2006.00063.x.

51.De Massis A, Solari L, Chua JH, Kotlar J. Family governance at work: Organizing for new product development in family SMES. Fam Bus Rev. 2016;29(2):137-55. doi: 10.1177/0894486515622722.

52.Momtaz PP, Parra IM. Is sustainable entrepreneurship profitable? ESG disclosure and the financial performance of SMES. Small Bus Econ. 2025;64:1535-64. doi: 10.1007/s11187-024-00981-5.

53.Sanz Torro V, Calafat-Marzal C, Guaita-Martinez JM, Marti L. An integrated approach to resource efficiency, green innovation and firm performance in SMES across EU 27 countries. J Assoc Small Bus Strateg. 2025; Epub ahead of print. doi: 10.1007/s11365-025-01098-1.

54.Ciasullo MV, Barile S, Saviano M, Caputo F. The interplay between social and environmental practices and organizational resilience: Empirical evidence. Bus Strateg Environ. 2024; Epub ahead of print. doi: 10.1002/bse.3530.

55.Sharma R, Skordoulis J, Panagiotis K. Building a sustainable future: The role of green innovation and resource efficiency in SMES. Environ Dev Sustain. 2025; Epub ahead of print. doi: 10.1007/s10668-025-06515-7.

56.Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Financing SMES for sustainability: Drivers, constraints and policies. OECD SME and Entrepreneurship Papers No. 35. Paris (France): OECD Publishing; 2022. doi: 10.1787/a5e94d92-en.

57.Freeman RE. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. London (UK): Pitman Publishing; 1984.

58.Giraldo-Giraldo C, Rubio-Andrés M, Rave-Gómez ED, Gutiérrez-Broncano S. Evolution of the concept and scientific mapping of Sustainable Human Resource Management S-(HRM). Admin Sci. 2025;15(2):39. doi: 10.3390/admsci15020039.

59.Gutiérrez-Broncano S, Rubio-Andrés M, Jiménez-Estévez P, Opute J, Giraldo-Giraldo C. Responsible Human Resource Management: A Strategic Approach. In Machado C, Davim JP, Editors. Building the Future with Human Resource Management. Cham (Switzerland): Springer International Publishing; 2024. p. 147-68. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-52811-8_6.

60.Fischer-Kreer D, Greven A, Desel L, Brettel M. Measuring regenerative orientation: A new scale for firms’ net-positive impact beyond sustainability. Eur Manag J. 2025; Epub ahead of print. doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2025.04.008.

61.Bergh DD, D’Oria L, Crook TR, Roccapriore A. Is knowledge really the most important strategic resource? A meta analytic review. Strateg Manag J. 2025;46:3-18. doi: 10.1002/smj.3645.

62.Grant RM. Prospering in dynamically competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organ Sci. 1996a;7(4):375-87. doi: 10.1287/orsc.7.4.375.

63.Grant RM. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strateg Manag J. 1996;17(S2):109-22. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250171110.

64.Nonaka I, Takeuchi H. The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press; 1995. doi: 10.1093/oso/9780195092691.001.0001.

65.Senge PM, Sterman JD. Systems thinking and organizational learning: Acting locally and thinking globally in the organization of the future. Eur J Oper Res. 1992;59(1):137-50. doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(92)90011-W.

66.Rehman UU, Iqbal A. Nexus of knowledge-oriented leadership, knowledge management, innovation and organizational performance in higher education. Bus Process Manag J. 2020;26(6):1731-58. doi: 10.1108/BPMJ-07-2019-0274.

67.Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strateg Manag J. 1997;18(7):509-33. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z.

68.López-Cabrales Á, Valle-Cabrera R. Sustainable HRM strategies and employment relationships as drivers of the triple bottom line. Hum Resour Manag Rev. 2020;30(3):100689. doi: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.100689.

69.Fazey I, Schäpke N, Caniglia G, Hodgson A, Kendrick I, Lyon C, et al. Transforming knowledge systems for life on earth: Visions of future systems and how to get there. Energy Res Soc Sci. 2020;70:101724. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101724.

70.Sahoo S, Kumar A, Upadhyay A. How do green knowledge management and green technology innovation impact corporate environmental performance? Understanding the role of green knowledge acquisition. Bus Strateg Environ. 2023;32(1):551-69. doi: 10.1002/bse.3160.

71.Holt TV, Whelan T. Research frontiers in the era of embedding sustainability: Bringing social and environmental systems to the forefront. J Sustain Res. 2021;3(2):e210010. doi: 10.20900/jsr20210010.

72.Papoutsi A, Sodhi MS. A sustainability disclosure index using corporate sustainability reports. J Sustain Res. 2020;2(2):e200020. doi: 10.20900/jsr20200020.

73.Lukács B, Rickards RC. Developing a consistent and transparent corporate sustainability rating system with a sector-agnostic approach. J Sustain Res. 2025;7(3):e250054. doi: 10.20900/jsr20250054.

74.Koporcic N, Kukkamalla PK, Markovic S, Maran T. Resilience of small and medium sized enterprises in times of crisis: An umbrella review. Rev Manag Sci. 2025;19(2):345-72. doi: 10.1007/s11846-025-00883-0.

75.Alkhalaf T, Al Tabbaa O. The effect of ability, motivation and opportunity (AMO) on SMES’ innovation performance. Creat Innov Manag. 2023;33(1):21-38. doi: 10.1111/caim.12578.

76.Aragon‐Correa JA, Sharma S. A contingent resource‐based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy. Acad Manag Rev. 2003;28(1):71-88. doi: 10.5465/amr.2003.8925233.

77.Pauceanu AM. The old, the new, and the used one—assessing legacy. Adm Sci. 2025;15(3):106. doi: 10.3390/admsci15030106.

78.Hair JF Jr, Hult GTM, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS SEM). 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA, US): Sage; 2021. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7.

79.Robles Garrote P, Rojas M del C. Validation by expert judgements: Two cases of qualitative research in applied linguistics. Rev Nebrija Lingüíst Aplicada Enseñanza Lenguas. 2015;9(18):124-39. doi: 10.26378/rnlael918259.

80.SmartPLS GmbH. (2023). SmartPLS (Version 4.1.1.4)
[Software]. SmartPLS GmbH. Available from: https://www.smartpls.com. Accessed on 29 Nov 2025.

81.Federación Nacional de Cafeteros de Colombia. FNC management report 2024. Available from: https://www.federaciondecafeteros.org/app/uploads/2025/06/Informe-de-Gestion-FNC-2024.pdf. Accessed on 17 June 2025.

82.Federación Nacional de Cafeteros de Colombia. (n.d.). Sustainability strategy: Economic, environmental, social, and governance pillars. Available from: https://antioquia.federaciondecafeteros.org/sostenibilidad/. Accessed on 17 June 2025.

83.Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. Multivariate data analysis. 8th ed. Independence (KY, US): Cengage Learning; 2019.

84.Kline RB. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. 5th ed. New York (NY, US): Guilford Publications; 2023. Available from: https://www.guilford.com/books/Principles-and-Practice-of-Structural-Equation-Modeling/Rex-Kline/9781462551910. Accessed on 3 Nov 2025.

85.Hair JF Jr, Hult GTM, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). 4th ed. Cham (Switzerland): Springer Nature; 2024. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-49920-7.

86.Barclay DW, Higgins CA, Thompson R. The partial least squares (PLS) approach to causal modeling: Personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Technol Stud. 1995;2(2):285-309.

87.Kock N, Hadaya P. Minimum sample size estimation in PLS-SEM: The inverse square root and gamma-exponential methods. Inf Syst J. 2018;28(1):227-61. doi: 10.1111/isj.12143.

88.Hallinger P, Suriyankietkaew S. Science mapping of the knowledge base on sustainable leadership, 1990–2018. Sustainability. 2018;10(12):4846. doi: 10.3390/su10124846.

89.Yu Y, Choi Y. Stakeholder pressure and CSR adoption: the mediating role of organizational culture for Chinese companies. Soc Sci J. 2016;53(2):226-35. doi: 10.1016/j.soscij.2014.07.006.

90.IBM Corp. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows (Version 29.0). Available from: https://www.ibm.com/products/spss-statistics. Accessed on 29 Nov 2025.

91.Hair JF, Howard MC, Nitzl C. Assessing measurement model quality in PLS SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. J Bus Res. 2020;109:101-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.069.

92.Diamantopoulos A, Siguaw JA. Formative versus reflective indicators in organizational measure development: A comparison and empirical illustration. Br J Manag. 2006;17(4):263-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00500.x.

93.Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J Acad Mark Sci. 2015;43(1):115-35. doi: 10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8.

94.Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res. 1981;18(1):39-50.

95.Berrone P, Cruz C, Gómez-Mejía LR. Socioemotional wealth in family firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Fam Bus Rev. 2012;25(3):258-79. doi: 10.1177/089448651143535.

96.Gómez-Mejía LR, Herrero I. Back to square one: The measurement of socioemotional wealth (sew). J Fam Bus Strateg. 2022;13(4):100480. doi: 10.1016/j.jfbs.2021.100480.

97.Werner-Lewandowska K, Wiecek-Janka E, Pawłowski G. Determinants of sustainability maturity in family businesses. Sustainability. 2025;17(5):1818. doi: 10.3390/su17051818.

98.Hernández-Perlines F, Blanco-González A, Miotto G. Innovation in family businesses: Exploring the influence of entrepreneurial orientation and absorptive capacity on innovative capacity. J Innov Knowl. 2024;9:100600. doi: 10.1016/j.jik.2024.100600.

99.Banga CM, Gobind J. Implementation of sustainability in human resource management: A literature review. SA J Hum Resour Manag. 2025;23:a2741. doi: 10.4102/sajhrm.v23i0.2741.

100.Chen W, Zhou AJ, Zhou SS, Hofman P, Yang X. Deconstructing socioemotional wealth: Social wealth and emotional wealth as core properties of family firms. Manag Organ Rev. 2022;18(2):223-50. doi: 10.1017/mor.2022.1.

101.Hernández-Linares R, Kellermanns FW, López-Fernández MC. The effect of socioemotional wealth on the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and family business performance. Bus Res Q. 2020;23(3):174-92. doi: 10.1177/2340944420941438.

102.Cosenza ACS, da Motta Reis JS, Souza CG, Barbastefano RG, Santos G, Barbosa LCFM. Sustainable human resource management, green human resource management, and environmental human resource management: Analysis of new and emerging terms related to the human resource area. Qual Innov Prosper. 2024;28(1):127-46. doi: 10.12776/qip.v28i1.1904.

103.Dyck A, Lins KV, Roth L, Wagner HF. Do institutional investors drive corporate social responsibility? J Financ Econ. 2019;131:693-714. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.08.013.

104.Ketprapakorn N, Kantabutra S. Toward an organizational theory of sustainability culture. Sustain Prod Consum. 2022;30:227-39. doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2022.05.020.

105.Rubio-Andrés M, del Mar Ramos-González MÁ, Sastre-Castillo MÁ, Gutiérrez-Broncano S. Stakeholder pressure and innovation capacity of SMEs in the COVID-19 pandemic: Mediating and multigroup analysis. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2023;190:122432. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122432.

引用本文

Camilo Giraldo-Giraldo*,Johnatan Castro-Gómez,Santiago Gutiérrez-Broncano,Víctor Alfonso Sánchez Montoya. Sustainable Human Resource Management and Leadership as Drivers of Competitive Performance: A Study on Sustainable Practices and Knowledge Management in Family Firms [J]. Journal of Sustainability Research. 2025; 7; (4). - .

文献评论

相关学者

相关机构