Journal of Modern Nursing MedicineJPCNS

Objective To discuss and study the effect of urinary flow mechanics catheter F8 and F6 on urinary flow rate. Methods A total of 108 patients were selected from 2023.4.18 to 2024.1.17 for the study data. Patients using F8 catheter were defined as F8 group, with a total of 60 patients. Patients using F6 catheters were defined as the F6 group, a total of 48 patients. Pain during catheterization, maximum, average and urinary flow rate between groups before catheterization and maximum, average and urinary flow rate between groups after catheterization were compared between the two groups. Results (1) The VRS pain score of F6 group was significantly lower than that of F8 group, and the pain-free rate of F6 group was significantly higher than that of F8 group, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). ② Before catheterization, there were no significant differences in the maximum urine flow rate, average urine flow rate and urine flow rate among groups (P > 0.05). (3) Compared with before and after catheterization, the maximum urine flow rate, average urine flow rate and urine flow rate were improved. However, compared with F8 group, the maximum urine flow rate, average urine flow rate and urine flow rate in F6 group were higher, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion F6 can reduce the pain and improve the maximum urine flow rate, average urine flow rate and urine flow rate in patients with catheterization, and has the value of clinical promotion.

urine flow mechanics; Catheter F8; Catheter F6; Urine flow rate; influence