文拉法辛联合喹硫平、奥氮平治疗难治性抑郁症的对照研究

Comparative study of venlafaxine combined with quetiapine or olanzapin in the treatment of treatment-resistant depression.

ES评分 0

DOI
刊名
Journal of International Psychiatry
年,卷(期) 2016, 43(1)
作者
作者单位

江苏省镇江市精神卫生中心 ;
南京脑科医院心境障得科 ;

摘要
探讨文拉法辛联合空硫平、 奥氮平治疗难治性1中郁症的疗效和安全性。 方法80例难治性1F郁症患者, 随机分为空石流平组 (文拉法辛联合空石东平) 和奥氮平组 (文拉法辛联合奥氮平)。疗程8周。采用汉密尔顿1中郁量表(HAMD) 评定疗效, 同时记录两纽不良反应发生情况。结果 a全疏平纽显效率67. 5%, 奥氮平组65%, 均有显著性疗效, 两组间无显著统计学意义(x2=0.05, P>0.05)。治疗2、4、6、8周后两组HMAD评分较治疗前有显著性降低,且差异具有显著性 (P<0. 01) 。 奥氮平纽食欲增加及体质量增加者较查疏平组多, 差异有显著统计学意义(x2=6.27, P=0.01; x2=4.58, P=0.03)。结论 文拉法辛联用全石流平、奥氮平治疗难治性抑郁症疗效好, 起效快。 文拉法辛联用 查石流平对食欲及体质量增加影响较小 。
Abstract
〇bjective To explore the efficacy and safety of venlafaxine combined with quetiapine or olanzap-in in treatment-resistant depression(TRD). Methods 80 patients with TRD were randomly divided into two com- bined groups, venlafaxine with quetiapine and venlafaxine with olanzapine, for8 weeks. Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression(HAMD) was used to evaluate the clinical e価cacy, at the same time recorded the adverse reactions. Results The response rate was67. 5% in quetiapine group and65% in olanzapin group. Both of two groups showed remarkable emcacy, and there was no significant difference between the two groups(Z2=0.05, P>0.05). In both of groups, the scores of 2nd, 4th, 6th, 8th weeks o「 HAMD were significantly reduced from the baseline and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.01). In olanzapin group, appetite and body weight gain were more ap- parent than the quetiapine group. There was significant difference between the two groups(X2=6. 27, P=0.01; K2 =4.58, P=0.03). Conclusion Venlafaxine combined with quetiapine or olanzapin are both good efficacy andwork fast in TRD. Venlafaxine combined with quetiapine doesless effect on appetite and body weight.
关键词
难治性抑郁症;文拉法辛; 喹硫平;奥氮平
KeyWord
Treatment-resistant depression; Venlafaxine; Quetiapine; 01anzapin
基金项目
页码 28-30
  • 参考文献
  • 相关文献
  • 引用本文

汪周兵*, 史家波,张长春,张广华,刘塘. 文拉法辛联合喹硫平、奥氮平治疗难治性抑郁症的对照研究 [J]. 国际精神病学杂志. 2016; 43; (1). 28 - 30.

  • 文献评论

相关学者

相关机构