综合护理干预对产后抑郁患者临床症状、抑郁程度及生活质量的改善作用

The improving effect of Clinical symptoms,severity of depression and quality of life with comprehensivenursing intervention in postpartum depression.

ES评分 0

DOI
刊名
Journal of International Psychiatry
年,卷(期) 2016, 43(2)
作者
作者单位

陕西省西安市中心医院妇产科 ;

摘要
目的 分析综合护理干预对产后抑郁患者临床症状、抑郁程度及生活质量的改善作用。方法 选取我院146例产后抑郁患者为研究对象,随机分为研究组和对照组各73例,产后研究组采取综合护理干预,给予对照组一般护理,分析两组患者抑郁程度以及生活质量改善效果。结果 经过护理,两组患者SDS、SAS评分均降低,护理1周,研究组患者SDS评分、SAS评分显著低于对照组SDS评分、SAS评分(P <0.05)。两组患者生活质量评分得到显著改善(P <0.05),研究组患者生活质量评分显著高于对照组(P <0.05)。研究组患者社会支持度和护理满意度均显著高于对照组(P <0.05)。结论 产后抑郁患者护理中采用综合护理干预能够显著改善患者抑郁程度,提高生活质量,具有推广价值。
Abstract
Objective Toanalysistheimprovingeffect of Clinical symptoms,severityof depressionandqual- To analysis the improving effect of Clinical symptoms,severityof depressionandqual- ,severityof depressionandqual- severity of depression and qual-ity of life with comprehensive nursing intervention in postpartum depression,andprovidereferenceforClinical Care. ,andprovidereferenceforClinical Care. and provide reference for Clinical Care.Methods 146patientswithpostpartumdepressioninhospitalfromwereselected,patentswere randomlydividedinto 146 patients with postpartum depression in hospital from were selected,patentswere randomlydividedinto ,patentswere randomlydividedinto patents were randomly divided intostudy group and control group,control grouppatientsweretakencareof general care,studygrouppatientsweretaken ,control grouppatientsweretakencareof general care,studygrouppatientsweretaken control group patients were taken care of general care,studygrouppatientsweretaken ,studygrouppatientsweretaken study group patients were takencare of comprehensive nursing intervention,thedegreeof depressionandqualityof lifeof patientswerecompared. ,thedegreeof depressionandqualityof lifeof patientswerecompared. the degree of depression and quality of life of patients were compared.Results Afternursing,theSDSandSASscoresofthetwogroupsweredecreased,StudypatientsSDSscore(37.20± After nursing,theSDSandSASscoresofthetwogroupsweredecreased,StudypatientsSDSscore(37.20± ,theSDSandSASscoresofthetwogroupsweredecreased,StudypatientsSDSscore(37.20± the SDS and SAS scores of the two groups were decreased,StudypatientsSDSscore(37.20± ,StudypatientsSDSscore(37.20± Study patients SDS score (37.20± (37.20± 37.20±23.64),SASscore(33.26±16.37)careoneweeksweresignificantlylowerthanthecontrol groupSDSscore(45.23± ),SASscore(33.26±16.37)careoneweeksweresignificantlylowerthanthecontrol groupSDSscore(45.23± SAS score (33.26±16.37)careoneweeksweresignificantlylowerthanthecontrol groupSDSscore(45.23± (33.26±16.37)careoneweeksweresignificantlylowerthanthecontrol groupSDSscore(45.23± 33.26±16.37)careoneweeksweresignificantlylowerthanthecontrol groupSDSscore(45.23± )careoneweeksweresignificantlylowerthanthecontrol groupSDSscore(45.23± care one weeks were significantly lower than the control group SDS score (45.23± (45.23± 45.23±21.61),SASscore(43.29±26.33), ),SASscore(43.29±26.33), SAS score (43.29±26.33), (43.29±26.33), 43.29±26.33), ),P <0.05.Two groups of patients quality of life scores was significantly improved,P <0.05,thestudygrouppatientsqualityoflifescore(89.97±13.28)wassignificantlyhigherthancontrolgroup(72.36 ,thestudygrouppatientsqualityoflifescore(89.97±13.28)wassignificantlyhigherthancontrolgroup(72.36 the study group patients quality of life score (89.97±13.28)wassignificantlyhigherthancontrolgroup(72.36 (89.97±13.28)wassignificantlyhigherthancontrolgroup(72.36 89.97±13.28)wassignificantlyhigherthancontrolgroup(72.36 )wassignificantlyhigherthancontrolgroup(72.36 was significantly higher than control group (72.36 (72.36 72.36±16.27), ),P <0.05.Social support patient study group (42.35±3.29)andnursingsatisfaction(98.62±2.3)were (42.35±3.29)andnursingsatisfaction(98.62±2.3)were 42.35±3.29)andnursingsatisfaction(98.62±2.3)were )andnursingsatisfaction(98.62±2.3)were and nursing satisfaction (98.62±2.3)were (98.62±2.3)were 98.62±2.3)were )were weresignificantly higher than control group degree of social support (35.22±3.58)andnursingsatisfaction(88.67±2.8), (35.22±3.58)andnursingsatisfaction(88.67±2.8), 35.22±3.58)andnursingsatisfaction(88.67±2.8), )andnursingsatisfaction(88.67±2.8), and nursing satisfaction (88.67±2.8), (88.67±2.8), 88.67±2.8), ),P <0.05. Conclusion Postpartumdepressionpatient careintegratednursinginterventioncansignificantlyimprovethe Postpartum depression patient care integrated nursing intervention can significantly improve thedegree of depression,qualityoflife,haspromotionalvalue. ,qualityoflife,haspromotionalvalue. quality of life,haspromotionalvalue. ,haspromotionalvalue. has promotional value.
关键词
产后抑郁;综合护理干预;生活质量
KeyWord
Postpartum depression;Comprehensive nursing intervention;Quality of life
基金项目
页码 341-343
  • 参考文献
  • 相关文献
  • 引用本文

杜伟伟*,胡 静,辛 颖,张宁如. 综合护理干预对产后抑郁患者临床症状、抑郁程度及生活质量的改善作用 [J]. 国际精神病学杂志. 2016; 43; (2). 341 - 343.

  • 文献评论

相关学者

相关机构