International Medical Research Frontier

Objective To explore the short-term clinical efficacy of single hole and two hole thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer. Methods the researchers selected 60 patients from February 2021 to may 2022 and randomly divided them into study group and control group. The patients in each group were treated with single hole thoracoscopy and two hole thoracoscopy, with 30 patients in each group. The final curative effect was compared. Results the pain indexes of the study group were lower after operation (P<0.05); The amount of bleeding and operation time in the study group were shorter than those in the control group, and the recovery of postoperative indicators was generally better than that in the control group; The level of ca21-1 was higher and the level of EGFR was lower in the study group after operation (P<0.05); The incidence of complications in the study group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion the trauma of lung cancer patients undergoing single hole thoracoscopic surgery is relatively small, and the postoperative recovery efficiency is high, but both single hole and two hole surgery have certain disadvantages, which need to be overcome in future clinical practice.

Single hole; Two holes; Thoracoscopy; Lung cancer; Clinical efficacy