系统化健康教育在脊柱骨折护理中的应用效果

Application effect of systematic health education in spinal fracture nursing

ES评分 0

DOI 10.12208/j.cn.20220441
刊名
Contemporary Nursing
年,卷(期) 2022, 3(10)
作者
作者单位

宁夏医科大学总医院 宁夏银川 ;

摘要
分析脊柱骨折患者实施系统性健康教育的效果。方法 从2020年1月-2022年1月区间内因脊柱骨折入院的患者内选中80例实验,根据不同的护理形式对其进行分组,即实验与对照,每组内人数为40例。对照组内整体均给予一般护理,实验组内整体均给予系统化健康教育,对比相关指标。结果 结果显示,对比发现,实验组在各个时间段的下肢疼痛评分均低于对照组,P<0.05。实验组下肢深静脉血栓形成几率低于对照组,P<0.05。实验组的各个时间段满意度均优于对照组,P<0.05。实验组知识掌握程度高于对照组,P<0.05。实验组不良情绪低于对照组,P<0.05。结论 对脊柱骨折患者实施系统化健康教育,可以改善疼痛,降低并发症发生率,提升满意度,让患者掌握更多的知识,缓解不良情绪。
Abstract
Objective: To analyze the effect of systematic health education for patients with spinal fracture. Methods: from January 2020 to January 2022, 80 patients with spinal fracture were selected for the experiment. They were divided into groups according to different nursing forms, i.e. experiment and control. The number of patients in each group was 40. General nursing was given in the control group as a whole, and systematic health education was given in the experimental group as a whole. The relevant indicators were compared. Results: the results showed that the lower limb pain scores of the experimental group were lower than those of the control group in all time periods (P < 0.05). The incidence of deep venous thrombosis in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05). The satisfaction of the experimental group was better than that of the control group (P < 0.05). The level of knowledge mastery in the experimental group was higher than that in the control group (P < 0.05). The bad mood of the experimental group was lower than that of the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: systematic health education for patients with spinal fracture can improve pain, reduce the incidence of complications, improve satisfaction, enable patients to master more knowledge and relieve bad emotions.
关键词
系统化健康教育;脊柱骨折;护理效果
KeyWord
systematic health education; Spinal fracture; Nursing effect
基金项目
页码 16-18
  • 参考文献
  • 相关文献
  • 引用本文

马军梅*,田淑玲,王晶. 系统化健康教育在脊柱骨折护理中的应用效果 [J]. 当代护理. 2022; 3; (10). 16 - 18.

  • 文献评论

相关学者

相关机构