Journal of Modern Nursing MedicineJPCNS

Objective To observe and analyze the application effect of hope theory intervention + hospice care in patients with advanced tumor. Methods A total of 90 patients with advanced cancer in our hospital during the period of 2021.1 to 2022.1 were selected and treated with routine nursing, hope theory intervention and hospice care. The effects of different intervention methods on patients negative emotion score before and after intervention, as well as the occurrence of adverse reactions and the difference of quality of life score were compared. Results The scores of SAS (52.1±1.3) and SDS (50.2±1.0) in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (60.3±4.5) and SDS (60.3±5.3), and the data were statistically significant (P<0.05). Meanwhile, the score of SF-36 in the observation group was (53.4±4.5), which was higher than that in the control group (48.6±4.7), and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). In terms of clinical adverse reactions, the incidence of the observation group was 8.89% (4/45), which was lower than that of the control group 17.78% (8/45), and the difference between the two groups was significant (P<0.05). Conclusions For patients with advanced cancer, the implementation of hope theory intervention + hospice care measures can help patients maintain a good attitude to accept treatment and face the disease, and then improve the quality of life and treatment safety of patients.

Advanced cancer; negative emotions; hospice care; Quality of life; Hope theory