集束化护理在急诊重症中暑患者中的效果-现代护理医学杂志-CSCIED科技核心评价数据库-手机版

集束化护理在急诊重症中暑患者中的效果

Effect of cluster nursing in emergency patients with severe heat stroke

ES评分 0 浏览量：583 下载量：0

DOI	10.12208/j. jmnm.202200285
刊名	现代护理医学杂志 Journal of Modern Nursing MedicineJPCNS
年，卷(期)	2022, 1(5)
作者	刘丽娜,窦宏杰*,
作者单位	上海瑞金医院无锡分院江苏无锡 ;
摘要	分析集束化护理用于急诊重症中暑的价值。方法对 2022 年 6 月-8 月本科接诊急诊重症中暑病人（n=30）进行随机分组，试验和对照组各 15 人，前者采取集束化护理，后者行常规护理。对比 sf-36 评分等指标。结果关于总有效率，试验组数据 100.0%，和对照组 80.0%相比很高（P＜0.05）。关于 sf-36 评分，；在干预结束时：试验组数据（87.14±3.16）分，和对照组数据（80.53±3.92）分相比更高（P＜0.05）。关于满意度，试验组数据 100.0%，和对照组数据 73.33%相比更高（P＜0.05）。关于护理质量：试验组各项评估数据都比对照组高（P＜0.05）。结论急诊重症中暑用集束化护理，效果显著，护理质量也更好，生活质量提升更为迅速，满意度改善更加明显。
Abstract	Objective To analyze the value of cluster nursing in emergency severe heat stroke. Methods From June to August 2022, 30 patients (n=30) with severe heat stroke were randomly divided into experimental group and control group, with 15 patients in each group. The former received cluster nursing, while the latter received routine nursing. The SF-36 score and other indicators were compared. Results The total effective rate of experimental group was 100.0%, which was higher than that of control group 80.0% (P < 0.05). Regarding the SF-36 score,; At the end of the intervention, the score of the experimental group (87.14±3.16) was higher than that of the control group (80.53±3.92) (P < 0.05). The satisfaction of the experimental group was 100.0%, which was higher than that of the control group (73.33%) (P < 0.05). About the quality of care: the evaluation data of the experimental group were higher than those of the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion Cluster nursing for severe heat stroke in emergency has significant effect, better nursing quality, faster improvement of quality of life, and more obvious improvement of satisfaction.
关键词	急诊重症中暑；满意度；集束化护理；生活质量
KeyWord	Emergency severe heat stroke; Satisfaction; Cluster care; The quality of life
基金项目
页码	66-68

参考文献
相关文献

[1] 曹小红,叶秋梅,潘开菊. 集束化护理联合降温毯在急诊重症中暑患者中的救治效果[J]. 当代护士（上旬刊）,2020,27(2):131-133.

[2] PENG,Z., LI,J., LI,Y., et al. Downregulation of miR-181bin mouse brain following ischemic stroke induces neuroprotection against ischemic injury through targeting heatshock protein A5 and ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase isozyme L1[J]. Journal of Neuroscience Research,2013,91(10):1349-1362.

[3] 李杰. 集束化护理干预在急诊重症中暑救治中的应用效果[J]. 世界最新医学信息文摘（连续型电子期刊）,2021,21(25):327,329.

[4] GRABOWSKI, MICHAL, BANECKI, BOGDAN,KADZINSKI, LESZEK, et al. The model homologue ofthe partially defective human 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase, considered as a risk factor for stroke due toincreased homocysteine level, can be protected and reactivated by heat shock proteins[J]. Metabolic brain disease,2016,31(5):1041-1045.

[5] 吴梅. 集束化护理干预在急诊重症中暑救治中的临床应用效果分析[J]. 人人健康,2019(9):112-113.

[6] 林慧. 重症中暑患者急诊护理中采用集束化护理的效果分析[J]. 养生保健指南,2017(21):132.

[7] 解淑萍. 集束化护理干预在急诊重症中署救治中的疗效[J]. 中国民间疗法,2019,27(3):86-88.

[8] 蒋琴. 集束化护理措施对重症中暑患者临床效果观察[J]. 心理医生,2018,24(22):284-285.

引用本文

刘丽娜,窦宏杰*. 集束化护理在急诊重症中暑患者中的效果 [J]. 现代护理医学杂志. 2022; 1; (5). 66 - 68.

文献评论

相关学者

相关机构