Journal of Advances in Clinical Nursing

Objective To investigate the effect of negative hysterectomy and laparoscopic open hysterectomy in the treatment of hysterosprolapse. Methods 80 patients with hysterosprolapse who had been treated from May 2018 to September 2020 were selected and divided into two groups, of which the patients who adopted negative hysterectomy were the control group (40cases) and the patients who used laparoscopic open hysterectomy were the observation group (40cases), and the bleeding volume, operation time, hospital stay time, treatment effect and degree of organ damage during the operation were compared between the two groups. Results The results showed that the bleeding volume, operation time, postoperative hospital stay or organ damage caused by the control group were significantly higher than those in the observation group, and the postoperative complications, the recurrence rate and VAS score within one year, and the quantitative grading scale score of pelvic organ prolapse were better than those in the control group, and the difference contained certain statistical significance (P<0.05). Conclusion Laparoscopic open hysterectomy in patients with hysterosprolapse will achieve better results in all aspects than negative hysterectomy.

Vaginal hysterectomy; Laparoscopic open hysterectomy; Uterine prolapse; Surgical effect