文拉法辛联合中药治疗老年抑郁症的临床研究

Clinical study of geriatric depression venlafaxine combined with traditional Chinese medicine

ES评分 0

DOI
刊名
Journal of International Psychiatry
年,卷(期) 2016, 43(5)
作者
作者单位

摘要
目的:观察并探讨文拉法辛联合盐酸川芎嗪、银杏达莫、脑心清片等中药治疗老年抑郁症的临床疗效及安全性。方法:入选2014年6月-2015年12月间的门诊诊治91例老年抑郁症患者为研究对象,随机分为观察组46例,对照组45例,对照组患者给予文拉法辛治疗,疗程8周,观察组在对照组基础上联合中医科给予盐酸川芎嗪(120mg/d,连续12d)、银杏达莫(20ml/d,连续12d)和脑心清片(6片/d,连续8周)治疗,分别于治疗后1、2、4、6、8周末测评汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD24)评分,并重点分析焦虑/躯体化因子评分,治疗第8周末评价临床疗效与安全性。结果:伴随治疗时间延长,两组HAMD24评分与焦虑/躯体化因子评分逐步下降。观察组治疗第1周末(27.7±4.0vs.31.4±6.1)和第二周末(22.2±5.4vs.27.0±4.5) HAMD24评分显著低于对照组(p<0.05),治疗第4周、6周、8周末两组HAMD24评分差异均无统计学意义(p>0.05);观察组治疗1周后焦虑/躯体化因子评分(7.6±1.9 vs.8.4±2.0)显著低于对照组(p<0.05)。治疗8周后,观察组临床总有效率(87.0% vs. 80.0%)、不良反应发生率(39.1%vs.31.1%)略高于对照组,差异均无统计学意义(p>0.05)。结论:文拉法辛单药治疗及联合中药治疗老年抑郁症均具有良好的疗效及安全性;文拉法辛联合中药治疗起效更快。
Abstract
Objective:To observe and explore the efficacy and safety of venlafaxine combined with ligustrazine injection, ginkgo dipyridolum injection and naoxinqing tablet in the treatment of senile depression. Methods: 91 senile depression patients of June 2014 to December 2015 were viewed as research objects and randomly divided into observation group (46 cases) and the control group (45 cases), the control group were treated with venlafaxine for 8 weeks, based on which the observation group was given ligustrazine injection(120 mg/d for 12 days), ginkgo dipyridolum injection (20ml/d for 12 days) and naoxinqing tablet (6 tablets/d for 8 weeks) treatment,after treatment for 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 weeks Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD24) was introduced to assess treatment condition, and focuses on the analysis of anxiety / somatization factor score, after treatment for 8 weeks, clinical efficacy and safety were evaluated. Results: With prolongation of treatment time, two groups of HAMD24 score and anxiety / somatization factor score decreased gradually. Observation group with HAMD24 score after 1 week’s treatment (27.7±4.0vs.31.4±6.1) and 2 weeks’ treatment (22.2±5.4vs.27.0±4.5) were significantly lower than the control group (p< 0.05), other observation points with no significant differences on HAMD24 scores between the two groups (p> 0.05). Anxiety / somatization factor score after treatment for 1 week of observation group (7.6±1.9 vs.8.4±2.0) was significantly lower than control group (p< 0.05). After 8 weeks’ treatment, the total effective ratio (87% vs. 80%) and adverse reaction incidence (39.1%vs.31.1%) of observation group were both slightly higher than the control group, the differences with no statistically significant (p>0.05). Conclusion: Venlafaxine monotherapy and combination of traditional Chinese medicine in treatment of senile depression both have good efficacy and safety; and the latter has a more rapid action.
关键词
文拉法辛;中药;抑郁症;汉密尔顿抑郁量表;焦虑/躯体化因子评分
KeyWord
venlafaxine; traditional Chinese medicine; depression; Hamilton depression scale; anxiety / somatization factor score
基金项目
页码 842-844
  • 参考文献
  • 相关文献
  • 引用本文

严彩英*. 文拉法辛联合中药治疗老年抑郁症的临床研究 [J]. 国际精神病学杂志. 2016; 43; (5). 842 - 844.

  • 文献评论

相关学者

相关机构