右旋美托咪定和丙泊酚治疗心脏术后谵妄的临床效果观察

Clinical effects of dexmedetomidine and propofol treated in patients undergoing cardiac surgery

ES评分 0

DOI
刊名
Journal of International Psychiatry
年,卷(期) 2016, 43(5)
作者
作者单位

徐州医学院护理学院 ;
滕州市中心人民医院 ;
徐州医学院附属医院 ;

摘要
摘要:探讨比较右旋美托咪定和丙泊酚治疗心脏术后患者谵妄的临床效果及安全性。方法 选择开展心脏手术的150例患者,按随机数字表法分为右旋美托咪定组(72例)和丙泊酚组(68例),比较两组在ICU住院天数、谵妄发生率、不良事件发生率等的差异。结果 两组应用右旋美托咪定与丙泊酚治疗后的ICDSC评分均较治疗前显著下降 (P<0.05);治疗后右旋美托咪定组的ICDSC评分较丙泊酚组下降更为明显(P<0.05)。右旋美托咪定组治疗后7天内谵妄发生率为11.11%,住院天数平均为9.35天,分别低于丙泊酚组的16.18%和12.41天,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。右旋美托咪定组的低血压(30.56%)、心动过缓(16.67%)、气管插管(4.17%)发生率均低于丙泊酚组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 右旋美托咪定较丙泊酚治疗心脏术后谵妄更为有效,且在减少副作用方面,右旋美托咪定具有明显优势,值得临床推荐。
Abstract
Abstract: Objective to investigate the clinical effects of dexmedetomidine and propofol treated in patients with heart postoperative surgery. Methods 150 patients with cardiac surgery who were selected and randomly included in dexmedetomidine midazolam group (72 cases) and propofol group (68 cases), were compared between the two groups in ICU stays, delirium rate, adverse events rate differences. Results ICDSC scores in two groups was significantly decreased compared to before treatment (P<0.05); ICDSC scores in dexmedetomidine midazolam group were significantly lower than propofol group (P<0.05). the incidence of delirium in dexmedetomidine group was 11.11%, ICU stays was 9.35 days were significantly lower than that in propofol group of 16.18% and 12.41 days (P<0.05). Hypotension (30.56%), tachycardia slow (16.67%), tracheal intubation (4.17%) incidence rate in dexmedetomidine midazolam group was significantly lower than that in propofol group with significant difference (P< 0.05). Conclusion Both dexmedetomidine and propofol can effectively treat patients with postoperative delirium. For reducing side effects, dexmedetomidine has significantly advantages and worthy of recommendation for clinical practice.
关键词
关键词:右旋美托咪定;丙泊酚;谵妄
KeyWord
Keywords: Dexmedetomidine; Propofol; delirium
基金项目
页码 882-884
  • 参考文献
  • 相关文献
  • 引用本文

李政玲,陈桂霞,张显平,赵文静*. 右旋美托咪定和丙泊酚治疗心脏术后谵妄的临床效果观察 [J]. 国际精神病学杂志. 2016; 43; (5). 882 - 884.

  • 文献评论

相关学者

相关机构