弓状韧带上腰方肌阻滞与胸椎旁阻滞用于腹腔镜胆囊切除术的镇痛效果比较-国际临床研究杂志-CSCIED科技核心评价数据库-手机版

弓状韧带上腰方肌阻滞与胸椎旁阻滞用于腹腔镜胆囊切除术的镇痛效果比较

Comparison of analgesic effect of quadratus lumborum block at the lateral supra‑arcuate ligament and thoracic paravertebral block in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

ES评分 0 浏览量：153 下载量：0

全文阅读下载引用收藏

DOI	10.12208/j.ijcr.20260067
刊名	国际临床研究杂志 International Journal of Clinical Research
年，卷(期)	2026, 10(2)
作者	旷昕³, 吕波², 邵青^1,2, 殷俊², 张俊峰²,
作者单位	1 汕头大学医学院广东汕头 2 深圳市宝安区福永人民医院麻醉科广东深圳 3 深圳市龙华区人民医院麻醉科广东深圳
摘要	背景：目前关于弓状韧带上腰方肌阻滞的应用报道还比较少，也没有研究比较弓状韧带上腰方肌阻滞与胸椎旁阻滞用于LC手术时，镇痛效果、不良反应、恢复质量的差别及对血流动力学的影响。目的比较弓状韧带上腰方肌阻滞与胸椎旁阻滞用于腹腔镜胆囊切除术镇痛效果。方法择期行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者60例，随机分为胸椎旁阻滞组（T组，TPVB）和弓状韧带上腰方肌阻滞组（Q组，QLB-LSAL），每组30例。麻醉诱导前在超声引导下T组行右侧TPVB，Q组行右侧QLB-LSAL，各给予0.4%罗哌卡因20ml。记录阻滞操作时间、阻滞平面，术中全麻药物及血管活性药物用量，术毕后不同时间点的HR、MAP、痛觉VAS评分及舒适度BCS评分，术后最早追加镇痛药的时间及总量，术后康复指标及不良反应。结果 Q组穿刺时间少于T组（P＜0. 05），差异有统计学意义，阻滞平面差异无统计学意义。术中全麻药用量及血管活性药用量，术后康复指标及术后不同时间点HR、MAP、疼痛VAS评分和舒适度BCS评分差异无统计学意义。T组7例补救镇痛、1例皮下血肿形成、2例恶心呕吐，Q组4例补救镇痛、2例恶心呕吐。T组补救镇痛率23.3%高于Q组13.3%（P>0.05）。结论在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中，经弓状韧带上腰方肌阻滞与胸椎旁阻滞的镇痛效果相当，均比较理想，但穿刺时间更短，穿刺风险更低，且补救镇痛率更低，可作为腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者的理想镇痛选择。
Abstract	Background: At present, there are scarce reports on the application of quadratus lumborum block at the lateral supra‑arcuate ligament, and no studies have compared the differences in analgesic effect, adverse reactions, recovery quality, and hemodynamics between quadratus lumborum block at the lateral supra‑arcuate ligament and thoracic paravertebral block in LC surgery. Objective To compare the analgesic effects of the quadratus lumborum block at the lateral supra arcuate ligament and the thoracic paravertebral block in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods Sixty patients scheduled for abdominal laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly divided into the thoracic paravertebral block group (T group, TPVB) and quadratus lumborum block group at the lateral supra‑arcuate ligament (Q group, LSAL), with 30 patients in each group. Before anesthesia induction, the T group received a right TPVB under ultrasound guidance, and the Q group received a right LSAL under ultrasound guidance, each receiving 0.4% ropivacaine 20 ml. The operation time, block level, and amounts of general anesthesia and vasoactive drugs used during the operation were recorded. The HR, MAP, pain VAS score, and comfort BCS score at different time points after the operation, the earliest time of postoperative analgesic drug administration, and the total amount of analgesic drug administration were recorded. The postoperative recovery indicators and adverse reactions were also recorded. Results The puncture time in the Q group was shorter than that in the T group (P < 0.05), and the difference was statistically significant, while the block level was not statistically significant. The amounts of general anesthesia and vasoactive drugs used during the operation, the postoperative recovery indicators, and the HR, MAP, pain VAS score, and comfort BCS score at different time points after the operation were not statistically significant between the two groups. In Group T, there were 7 cases of remedial analgesia, 1 case of subcutaneous hematoma formation, and 2 cases of nausea and vomiting. Meanwhile, in Group Q, there were 4 cases of remedial analgesia and 2 cases of nausea and vomiting. The rate of remedial analgesia in group T was 23.3% higher than 13.3% in group Q (P>0.05). Conclusion In laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the analgesic effects of the quadratus lumborum block at the lateral supra arcuate ligament and the thoracic paravertebral block are equivalent and satisfactory, but the puncture time is shorter, the puncture risk is lower, and the rate of rescue analgesia is lower, making them ideal choices for analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecyst.
关键词	弓状韧带上腰方肌阻滞；胸椎旁阻滞；腹腔镜胆囊切除术；围术期镇痛
KeyWord	Quadratus lumborum block at the lateral supra‑arcuate ligament; Thoracic paravertebral block; Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Perioperative analgesia
基金项目
页码	35-42

参考文献
相关文献

[1] 杨奕夫, 黎柏峰, 肖艳. 日间腹腔镜胆囊切除术质量控制的研究进展. 腹腔镜外科杂志. 2020. 25(10): 796-798,800.

[2] 何世武, 陈冬红, 朱树伟. 超声引导下弓状韧带上腰方肌阻滞用于腹腔镜胆囊切除术的镇痛效果. 海南医学. 2021. 32(08): 1027-1029.

[3] 王美青, 潘寅兵, 钱燕宁. 腹腔镜胆囊切除术后疼痛的原因及对策. 临床麻醉学杂志. 2013. 29(11): 1126-1129.

[4] 吴振威, 倪华栋, 侯晓敏, 姚明. 超声引导下胸椎旁神经阻滞用于腹腔镜胆囊切除术后镇痛的临床效果. 中国现代医生. 2018. 56(22): 99-103.

[5] 谭会领, 张敏, 张富杰, 崔同阳, 武振东, 吕吟啸. 超声竖脊肌平面阻滞在腹腔镜胆囊结石合并胆总管结石手术中的应用. 腹腔镜外科杂志. 2023. 28(11): 841-845.

[6] 赵喜波, 刘涛, 冯渊波. 弓状韧带上腰方肌前侧阻滞联合全身麻醉在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的应用效果. 中国民康医学. 2024. 36(12): 32-35.

[7] 董伟, 田小玲, 王娟, 范向阳. 全身麻醉联合腹横肌平面阻滞在腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者中的应用及对术后并发症的影响. 临床和实验医学杂志. 2024. 23(8): 890-894.

[8] 薛金虎, 李治松, 邢飞, 杨建军. 胸椎旁神经阻滞联合全身麻醉对腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后早期康复的影响. 中华麻醉学杂志. 2019. 39(11): 1294-1297.

[9] 吴振威, 李振平, 袁孝忠, 陆雅萍, 周煦燕, 姚明. 超声引导两点法胸椎旁神经阻滞用于腹腔镜胆囊切除术老年患者术后镇痛. 全科医学临床与教育. 2019. 17(7): 612-615.

[10] 关宇健, 何志权, 谢霞, 李绮君, 陈家华. 超声引导椎旁神经阻滞联合酒石酸布托啡诺对腹腔镜胆囊切除术的术后镇痛分析. 山西医药杂志. 2019. 48(20): 2463-2465.

[11] 刘颖, 谢冕. 胸椎旁神经阻滞技术的应用进展. 局解手术学杂志. 2018. 27(09): 688-692.

[12] 刘紫仪, 张辰喜, 潘欣, 穆建慧, 张勇. 超声引导下弓状韧带上腰方肌阻滞的方法. 国际麻醉学与复苏杂志. 2024. 45(5): 542-546.

[13] 邵沛琪, 王云. 弓状韧带上腰方肌阻滞的解剖基础和临床应用. 中华麻醉学杂志. 2022. 42(1): 117-120.

[14] Huang X, Sun Y, Shi R, et al. Comparison of ultrasound-guided anterior quadratus lumborum block at the lateral supra-arcuate ligament with posterior quadratus lumborum block for perioperative analgesia in laparoscopic nephrectomy: a protocol for a randomised, prospective, parallel group, non-inferior trial. BMJ Open. 2021. 11(8): e048490.

[15] Shi R, Li H, Wang Y. Dermatomal coverage of single-injection ultrasound-guided parasagittal approach to anterior quadratus lumborum block at the lateral supra-arcuate ligament. J Anesth. 2021. 35(2): 307-310.

[16] 耿昊. 超声引导下两种入路腰方肌阻滞在腹腔镜结直肠手术中应用的比较 ,2021.

[17] 朱开来, 王传光, 尧银光, 丁雷鸣. 超声引导下外侧弓状韧带上腰方肌阻滞在开腹肝脏手术中的应用. 中国医师杂志. 2022. 24(8): 1170-1174.

[18] 王丽萍, 许汀, 邱晟. 弓状韧带上腰方肌阻滞对腹腔镜胆囊切除患者术后恢复质量的影响. 中国医药导报. 2023. 20(10): 92-95,116.

[19] 王丽萍, 邱晟, 高金梅, 杨菲, 邹毅清, 郭晓明. 腹腔镜妇科手术麻醉的优化策略：弓状韧带上腰方肌前侧阻滞联合全身麻醉. 中华麻醉学杂志. 2022. 42(5): 581-585.

[20] 林良青, 吴清华, 柯品辉, 喻耀华, 林春兰. 超声引导双侧外侧弓状韧带上腰方肌阻滞复合全身麻醉用于腹腔镜胃癌根治术可行性研究. 创伤与急诊电子杂志. 2022. 10(3): 129-136.

[21] 马树勇, 张海燕. 超声引导单点、两点TPVB联合全身麻醉行肺叶切除术的效果. 当代临床医刊. 2023. 36(03): 45-46.

[22] 王焱, 刘政呈, 杨如松, 马正良. 超声引导下胸椎旁阻滞致肋间血管损伤的发生率及危险因素. 兰州大学学报(医学版). 2023. 49(02): 74-79.

[23] Pace MM, Sharma B, Anderson-Dam J, Fleischmann K, Warren L, Stefanovich P. Ultrasound-Guided Thoracic Paravertebral Blockade: A Retrospective Study of the Incidence of Complications. Anesth Analg. 2016. 122(4): 1186-91.

[24] 陈韦东, 谭炜浩, 钟锦涛等. 胸椎旁神经阻滞技术的研究进展. 中国临床解剖学杂志. 2021. 39(01): 111-114.

[25] 王刚, 马浩南, 王国林. 区域阻滞麻醉后反跳痛的研究进展. 国际麻醉学与复苏杂志. 2023. 44(8): 880-884.

[26] M J H, R S, A M M, S F H. Peripheral nerve block in ankle fracture surgery: a qualitative study of patients' experiences. ANAESTHESIA. 2018. 73(1): 49-58.

[27] 祁富伟, 张文娟, 沈健等. 胸神经阻滞对乳腺癌改良根治术术后镇痛效果的评价. 国际麻醉学与复苏杂志. 2018. 39(10): 961-965.

[28] Shih YW, Tsai HY, Lin FS, et al. Effects of Positive and Negative Expectations on Human Pain Perception Engage Separate But Interrelated and Dependently Regulated Cerebral Mechanisms. J Neurosci. 2019. 39(7): 1261-1274.

[29] 罗云珂. 不同的神经阻滞方法对肾脏手术患者术后疼痛程度影响的网状Meta分析 ,2024.

[30] 蔡敏, 尹泓, 易明亮, 赵聪, 李红梅, 黄雪薇. 超声引导下经弓状韧带上或前路腰方肌阻滞在腹腔镜全子宫切除术中的比较. 临床麻醉学杂志. 2022. 38(03): 229-233.

[31] 李野, 张生茂, 包娜日素. 外侧弓状韧带上腰方肌阻滞临床应用进展. 内蒙古医学杂志. 2024. 56(1): 53-56.

引用本文

旷昕, 吕波, 邵青^,, 殷俊, 张俊峰. 弓状韧带上腰方肌阻滞与胸椎旁阻滞用于腹腔镜胆囊切除术的镇痛效果比较 [J]. 国际临床研究杂志. 2026; 10; (2). 35 - 42.

文献评论

相关学者

相关机构