血小板参数联合AMIS65评分预测肝硬化短期上消化道出血的风险-国际临床研究杂志-CSCIED科技核心评价数据库-手机版

血小板参数联合AMIS65评分预测肝硬化短期上消化道出血的风险

Platelet parameters combined with AMIS65 score predict the risk of short-term upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with liver cirrhosis

ES评分 0 浏览量：159 下载量：0

全文阅读下载引用收藏

DOI	10.12208/j.ijcr.20260125
刊名	国际临床研究杂志 International Journal of Clinical Research
年，卷(期)	2026, 10(3)
作者	刘佩¹, 李心怡¹, 杨涓³, 曾雪丽¹, 张顺玲¹, 郑盛²,
作者单位	大理大学第二附属医院云南昆明; 大理大学临床医学院云南大理; 云南省第二人民医院云南昆明;
摘要	目的探究血小板计数（platelet count, PLT）、血小板分布宽度（platelet distribution width, PDW）、血小板平均体积（mean platelet volume, MPV）、血小板压积（plateletcrit, PCT）等血小板参数联合AMIS65评分在预测肝硬化患者短期内发生上消化道出血风险方面的效能。方法选取2020年1月-2024年7月在大理大学第二附属医院诊治的135例肝硬化患者，根据患者是否在短期内（＜3个月）发生上消化道出血，将其分为非出血组（71例）和出血组（64例），比较两组血小板参数和AMIS65评分水平，应用Logistic回归分析探讨肝硬化短期内发生上消化道出血危险因素；绘制ROC曲线分析血小板参数和AMIS65评分的联合作用，评估其对肝硬化患者短期内发生上消化道出血的预测价值。结果出血组患者PLT（55.50（42.00~83.50）VS 85.00（75.00~112.00），P＜0.05）、PCT（0.07（0.04~0.10） VS 0.11（0.08~0.17），P＜0.05）低于非出血组；出血组患者PDW（17.55（13.00~19.75） VS 12.40（11.10~13.80）P＜0.05）、MPV（11.70（10.93~13.12） VS 11.20（10.40~12.30），P＜0.05）、AMIS65评分（1.05（1.00~2.00） VS 1.00（0~1.00），P＜0.05）高于非出血组；Logistic回归分析显示，PDW、AMIS65评分是肝硬化患者短期内发生上消化道出血的独立危险因素（P均＜0.05），ROC曲线分析显示PLT、PDW、MPV、PCT、AMIS65评分单独检测肝硬化患者短期内发生上消化道出血的AUC分别为0.824(95%CI 0.752~0.896)、0.813 (95%CI 0.739~0.887)、0.639(95%CI 0.546~0.732)、0.823(95%CI 0.755~0.890)、0.761(95%CI 0.680~0.842)，PLT、PDW、MPV、PCT联合AMIS65评分检测肝硬化患者短期内发生上消化道出血的AUC为0.915(95%CI 0.868~0.962)，优于单一指标的预测效能（P＜0.05）。结论血小板参数联合AMIS65评分对肝硬化短期内发生上消化道出血的风险评估具有一定的价值,联合检测的AUC为0.915(95%CI 0.868~0.962)，显著优于任意单一指标（P＜0.05）。
Abstract	Objective To investigate the efficacy of platelet parameters such as platelet count (PLT), platelet distribution width (PDW), mean platelet volume (MPV), platelet compression volume (PCT) and other platelet parameters in combination with the efficacy of AMIS65 score in predicting the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in cirrhotic patients in the short term. Methods One hundred thirty-five patients with cirrhosis who were diagnosed and treated at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Dali University from January 2020 to July 2024 were selected and divided into the non-bleeding group (71 patients) and the bleeding group (64 patients) according to whether or not they had an upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a short period of time (<3 months), and the levels of the platelet parameters and AMIS65 scores of the two groups were compared to each other, and the Logistic regression analysis was applied to investigate the effectiveness of the platelet parameters and AMIS65 scores in predicting the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a short period of time. Logistic regression analysis was applied to explore the risk factors for the occurrence of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the short term in cirrhosis; ROC curves were drawn to analyze the combined effect of platelet parameters and AMIS65 score and evaluate their predictive value for upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with liver cirrhosis within a short period. Results PLT (55.50 (42.00~83.50) VS 85.00 (75.00~112.00), P<0.05) and PCT (0.07 (0.04~0.10) VS 0.11 (0.08~0.17), P<0.05) were lower in patients of the bleeding group than those of the non-bleeding group; PDW (17.55 (13.00~19.75) VS 12.40 (11.10~13.80) P < 0.05) were lower in the bleeding group than in the non-bleeding group. MPV (11.70 (10.93~13.12) VS 11.20 (10.40~12.30), P < 0.05), and AMIS65 score (1.05 (1.00~2.00) VS 1.00 (0~1.00), P < 0.05) were higher than those in the non-bleeding group; logistic regression analysis showed that PDW and AMIS65 scores were independent risk factors for the occurrence of short-term upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis (both P < 0.05), and ROC curve analysis showed that the AUC of PLT, PDW, MPV, PCT, and AMIS65 scores alone for detecting the occurrence of short-term upper gastrointestinal bleeding in cirrhotic patients were 0.824 (95% CI 0.752~0.896), 0.813 (95% CI 0.739~0.887), 0.639 (95% CI 0.546~0.732), 0.823 (95% CI 0.755~0.890), and 0.761 (95% CI 0.680~0.842), respectively, and that PLT, PDW, MPV, and PCT combined with AMIS65 score to detect short-term occurrence of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis had an AUC of 0.915 (95% CI 0.868~0.962), which was superior to the predictive efficacy of a single index (P<0.05). Conclusion The combined assessment of platelet parameters and the AMIS65 score demonstrates significant value in evaluating the risk of short-term upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with liver cirrhosis. The combined test achieved an AUC of 0.915 (95% CI 0.868~0.962), which was significantly superior to any single indicator (P < 0.05).
关键词	肝硬化；上消化道出血；血小板参数；AMIS65评分；风险预测
KeyWord	Cirrhosis; Upper gastrointestinal bleeding; Platelet parameters; AMIS65 score; Risk prediction
基金项目
页码	36-42

参考文献
相关文献

[1] Chirapongsathorn S, Akkarachinores K, Chaiprasert A. Development and validation of prognostic model to predict mortality among cirrhotic patients with acute variceal bleeding: A retrospective study
[J]. JGH open: an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2021, 5(6): 658-663.

[2] Roberts LN, Lisman T, Stanworth S, et al. Periprocedural management of abnormal coagulation parameters and thrombocytopenia in patients with cirrhosis: Guidance from the SSC of the ISTH
[J]. Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis: JTH, 2022, 20(1): 39-47.

[3] Radaelli F, Rocchetto S, Piagnani A, et al. Scoring systems for risk stratification in upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding
[J]. Best practice & research. Clinical gastroenterology, 2023, 12(67): 101871.

[4] 徐小元,丁惠国,令狐恩强,等.肝硬化门静脉高压食管胃静脉曲张出血的防治指南
[J].临床肝胆病杂志,2023, 39(03):527-538.

[5] 张林,韩笑笑,田金萍.预测肝硬化上消化道出血风险：前沿研究
[J].肝胆外科杂志,2023,31(06):477-480.

[6] 蔡旭,许帅,尚帅.血小板参数NF-κB IL-6水平检测与肝硬化患者合并上消化道出血病情及转归的关联性研究
[J].河北医学,2024,30(08):1386-1390.

[7] Fierro-Angulo OM, González-Regueiro JA, Pereira-García A, et al. Hematological abnormalities in liver cirrhosis
[J]. World journal of hepatology, 2024, 16(9): 1229-1246.

[8] Yoshida H, Shimizu T, Yoshioka M, et al. The role of the spleen in portal hypertension
[J]. Digestive and liver disease: official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver, 2023, 90(1): 20-25.

[9] Sigal SH, Sherman Z, Jesudian A, et al. Clinical implications of thrombocytopenia for the cirrhotic patient
[J]. Hepatic medicine: evidence and research, 2020, 12: 49-60.

[10] Tatlıparmak AC, Dikme Ö, Dikme Ö, et al. Cancer, platelet distribution width, and total protein levels as predictors of rebleeding in upper gastrointestinal bleeding
[J]. Peer J, 2022, 10: e14061.

[11] 苏小红, 李静博. 肝硬化患者血小板参数、凝血指标与上消化道出血的相关性
[J]. 肝脏, 2023, 28(10): 1171-1174.

[12] 丁靖诺,赵卫峰.肝硬化状态对血小板数目及功能变化的影响分析
[J].胃肠病学和肝病学杂志,2022,31(07):725-730.

[13] Li JP, Tan Y, Sun H, et al. Clinical management of thrombocytopenia in cirrhosis
[J]. Chinese journal of hepatology, 2024;32(6):489-492.

[14] 刘波.肝硬化急性上消化道出血的危险分层
[J].中国临床医生杂志,2024,52(11):1261-1266.

[15] Ak R, Hökenek NM. Comparison of AIMS65 and Glasgow Blatchford scores in predicting mortality in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding
[J]. Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira, 2021, 67(5): 766-770.

[16] Robertson M, Ng J, Abu Shawish W, et al. Risk stratification in acute variceal bleeding: comparison of the AIMS65 score to established upper gastrointestinal bleeding and liver disease severity risk stratification scoring systems in predicting mortality and rebleeding
[J]. Digestive Endoscopy, 2020, 32(5): 761-768.

[17] 郭亚卿,辛金换,刘洋,等.凝血功能指标联合AMIS65评分系统预测肝硬化患者并发上消化道出血的风险
[J].传染病信息,2023,36(05):405-409.

[18] 陈燕林.肝硬化患者并发上消化道出血的危险因素分析
[J].现代诊断与治疗,2022,33(16):2453-2456.

[19] 胡美庆,陶茂根,周小波,等.肝硬化合并消化道出血影响因素及Fbg、D-D、IL-6相关预测模型构建
[J].浙江临床医学,2024,26(11):1602-1604+1608.

[20] Brusilovskaya K, Hofer BS, Simbrunner B, et al. Platelet function decreases with increasing severity of liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension—a prospective study
[J]. Thrombosis and haemostasis,2023,123(12):1140-1150.

[21] 王修石,冷小艳.肝硬化患者网织血小板和血小板参数的临床应用价值
[J].中国肝脏病杂志,2016,8(02):82-85.

引用本文

刘佩, 李心怡, 杨涓, 曾雪丽, 张顺玲, 郑盛. 血小板参数联合AMIS65评分预测肝硬化短期上消化道出血的风险 [J]. 国际临床研究杂志. 2026; 10; (3). 36 - 42.

文献评论

相关学者

相关机构