International Journal of Clinical Research

Objective To compare the therapeutic effects of interventional occlusion surgery and surgical treatment for congenital heart disease (hereinafter referred to as congenital heart disease). Methods 86 children with congenital heart disease admitted to our hospital from June 2024 to June 2025 were selected and randomly divided into two groups. The control group of 43 cases underwent surgical treatment, and the observation group of 43 cases underwent interventional occlusion surgery. The treatment results of the two groups were compared. Results The operation time, postoperative ICU stay time, and total hospital stay time of the two groups were compared, and the observation group was shorter. The intraoperative blood transfusion volume of the two groups was compared, and the observation group was less (P < 0.05); Before treatment, the LA, LV, and RV indicators of the two groups were compared, and there was no significant difference (P > 0.05). After treatment, the geometric indicators of each heart in the observation group were lower (P < 0.05); The incidence of complications between the two groups was compared, and the observation group was 4.65% lower (P < 0.05). Conclusion For children with congenital heart disease, the application of interventional occlusion surgery can achieve a more ideal therapeutic effect compared with surgical treatment. It can reduce surgical risks, shorten operation time and hospital stay, and also reduce intraoperative blood transfusion volume, improve the geometric indicators of the child's heart, and reduce postoperative complications. It has a high application value.

Congenital heart disease; Interventional occlusion surgery; Surgical treatment