从准确性到得体性——生成式AI时代英语专业核心素养重构研究-国际教育学-CSCIED科技核心评价数据库-手机版

从准确性到得体性——生成式AI时代英语专业核心素养重构研究

From accuracy to appropriacy: reconstructing core competencies for English majors in the era of generative AI

ES评分 0 浏览量：130 下载量：0

DOI	10.12208/j.ije.20250422
刊名	国际教育学 International Journal of Education
年，卷(期)	2025, 7(12)
作者	王丽,
作者单位	青岛科技大学山东青岛
摘要	生成式人工智能的爆发性增长使英语专业面临严峻的危机，传统的以语言形式准确性为核心的培养范式正面临挑战。本研究基于能力本位教育（CBE）理念指出英语专业教育亟需从形式训练向语用转向进阶。本研究构建了包含技能、情感态度、价值观的三维核心素养框架。在技能维度，提出以语用重构替代传统技能训练；在情感态度维度，强调对抗认知怠惰的认知韧性与交际主体责任；在价值观维度，重申算法无法模拟的人文共情与伦理判断。研究进一步提出了全科融入的课程改革路径，旨在通过确立人类在人机协同中的语用决策地位，培养适应智能时代的高阶人才。
Abstract	The explosive growth of generative artificial intelligence has brought unprecedented challenges to English language education, where the traditional training paradigm centered on linguistic accuracy is facing a critical juncture. Grounded in Competency-Based Education (CBE) principles, this study argues for an urgent pragmatic turn in English major curricula from form-focused training to pragmatics-oriented development. The study constructs a three-dimensional core competency framework encompassing skills, attitudes, and values. In the skill dimension, it proposes pragmatic reconstruction to replace conventional language drills; in the attitudinal dimension, it emphasizes cognitive resilience against cognitive complacency and communicative agency; in the value dimension, it reaffirms humanistic empathy and ethical judgment that algorithms cannot replicate. The study further advances a comprehensive curriculum reform pathway across all courses, aiming to establish human primacy in pragmatic decision-making within the human-AI loop and cultivate high-order talents adapted to the intelligent era.
关键词	生成式AI；英语专业；核心素养；语用能力
KeyWord	Generative AI; English major; Core competencies; Pragmatic competence
基金项目
页码	22-25

参考文献
相关文献

[1] Kostka, I., & Toncelli, R. Exploring applications of ChatGPT to English language teaching: Opportunities, challenges, and recommendations
[J]. TESL-EJ, 2023(3): 1-24.

[2] Kecskés, I., & Dinh, H. ChatGPT for intercultural pragmatic learning? Potentially, but not yet
[J]. Intercultural Pragmatics, 2025(2): 369-397.

[3] Thomas, J. Cross-cultural pragmatic failure
[J]. Applied Linguistics, 1983(2): 91-112.

[4] Bachman, L., & Palmer, A. S. Language assessment in practice: Developing language assessments and justifying their use in the real world
[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2010.

[5] Taguchi, N. Pragmatic competence in a second language: From theory to practice. In N. Taguchi (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and pragmatics (pp. 1-14). New York: Routledge. 2019.

[6] Qi, X., & Chen, Z. A systematic review of technology integration in developing L2 pragmatic competence
[J]. Education Sciences, 2025(2):172.

[7] McClarty, K. L., & Gaertner, M. N. Measuring mastery: Best practices for assessment in competency-based education
[M]. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute. 2015.

[8] Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big
[J]? In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. 2021: 610-623.

[9] Wei, J., Wang, X., Schuurmans, D., Bosma, M., Ichter, B., Xia, F., & Zhou, D. Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2022 (35): 24824-24837.

[10] Manna, M., Eradze, M., & Bojic, L. How inclusive large language models can be? The curious case of pragmatics
[J]. Frontiers in Education, 2025(10): 1619662.

[11] Tram, N. H. M., Nguyen, T. T., & Tran, C. D. ChatGPT as a tool for self-learning English among EFL learners: A multi-methods study
[J]. System, 2024(127): 103528.

引用本文

王丽. 从准确性到得体性——生成式AI时代英语专业核心素养重构研究 [J]. 国际教育学. 2025; 7; (12). 22 - 25.

文献评论

相关学者

相关机构