藏族和汉族首发焦虑障碍患者心理防御机制和应对方式对比研究-国际精神病学杂志-CSCIED科技核心评价数据库-手机版

藏族和汉族首发焦虑障碍患者心理防御机制和应对方式对比研究

The difference of psychological defense mechanisms and coping styles between Tibetan and Han nationality: a comparative study

ES评分 0 浏览量：491 下载量：0

全文阅读下载引用收藏

DOI
刊名	国际精神病学杂志 Journal of International Psychiatry
年，卷(期)	2018, 45(5)
作者	沈晓玲,董再全,王旭,卓瑜,黄霞,罗珊霞*,
作者单位	四川大学华西医院 ;
摘要	探讨藏族和汉族首发焦虑障碍患者心理防御机制及应对方式的差异。方法采用防御方式问卷（DSQ）及特质应对方式问卷（TCSQ）分别对60例藏族及60例汉族首发焦虑障碍患者进行评定。结果在防御方式上，藏族受试者的不成熟型防御机制的投射、躯体化因子分及中间型防御机制的假性利他因子分高于汉族受试者（P<0.05）,而成熟型防御机制的升华因子分低于汉族受试者（P<0.05）；在应对方式上，藏族和汉族受试者的积极应对因子没有差异，但在消极应对方式上，藏族受试者的得分低于汉族（P<0.05）。结论藏族和汉族首发焦虑障碍患者在心理防御机制及应对方式的运用方面存在一定差异，对理解其疾病的形成有一定的意义。
Abstract	Objective Discuss the difference of psychological defense mechanisms and coping styles between Tibetan and Han nationalities. Methods Defense Style Questionnaire (DSQ) and Trait Coping Style Questionnaire （TCSQ） were used to assess patients’ psychological defense mechanisms and coping styles. 60 Tibetan patients and 60 Han patients with (starting anxiety) were selected and assessed. Results： Tibetan patients had significant higher scores on projection, somatization and pseudo altruistic factor than Han patients (P<0.05), while the former group of patients had lower scores on sublimation (P<0.05). As for coping styles, there was no significant difference in scores of positive coping factor on both groups of patients(P>0.05). However, Tibetan patients had lower scores than Han patients in negative coping factor(P<0.05). Conclusion：There is certain difference in psychological defense mechanism and application of copying strategies between Tibetan patients and Han patients, which helps explore causes of their anxiety.
关键词	藏族；汉族；焦虑障碍；心理防御机制；应对方式
KeyWord	Tibetan nationality；Han nationality；Anxiety; Psychological defense mechanism; Coping style.
基金项目
页码	871-874

参考文献
相关文献

引用本文

沈晓玲,董再全,王旭,卓瑜,黄霞,罗珊霞*. 藏族和汉族首发焦虑障碍患者心理防御机制和应对方式对比研究 [J]. 国际精神病学杂志. 2018; 45; (5). 871 - 874.

文献评论

相关学者

相关机构