International Medical Research Frontier

Objective To explore the efficacy of dynamic electrocardiogram and conventional electrocardiogram in the diagnosis of arrhythmia. Methods From June 2024 to June 2025, 70 patients with suspected arrhythmia admitted to our hospital were selected and divided into the control group (n=35, conventional electrocardiogram) and the observation group (n=35, dynamic electrocardiogram) according to the random number table method. The effects of the two groups were compared. Results The total detection rate of arrhythmia and the detection of various types of arrhythmia in the observation group were better than those in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion Compared with conventional electrocardiogram, dynamic electrocardiogram can continuously monitor the 24-hour electrocardiogram activities of patients, significantly improve the total detection rate of arrhythmia and the detection level of various specific arrhythmias, especially for the diagnosis of transient and intermittent arrhythmias, the advantages are more obvious, and it is worthy of wide application in clinical practice.

Dynamic electrocardiogram; Conventional electrocardiogram; Arrhythmia; Clinical diagnosis