放射科急诊DR的图像质量控制方法探讨

Discussion on image quality control methods for emergency DR in radiology department

ES评分 0

DOI 10.12208/j.ijcr.20250435
刊名
International Journal of Clinical Research
年,卷(期) 2025, 9(9)
作者
作者单位

广州市从化区江埔街社区卫生服务中心 广东广州

摘要
目的 放射科的急诊 DR(数字化 X 射线摄影)能够快速为急诊患者提供初步的影像诊断依据,帮助医生及时准确地判断病情,但DR图像质量至关重要,因此本文深入探讨放射科急诊 DR 的图像质量控制方法具有极其重要的现实意义。方法 研究样本选自我院放射科急诊接受DR诊断的患者,对比实施加强急诊 DR 的图像质量控制前后的应用效果。结果 观察组的甲级片占比明显高于对照组,摆位不规范、伪影、密度对比度调整不良等发生率均低于对照组,P<0.05说明存在对比意义。结论 通过实施全面质量控制管理策略,有效提升了放射科急诊DR图像的质量水平和诊断准确率,为患者提供了更加优质、高效的医疗服务。
Abstract
Objective Emergency DR (Digital X-ray Radiography) in the radiology department can quickly provide initial imaging diagnostic evidence for emergency patients, helping doctors accurately and promptly assess the condition. However, the image quality of DR Is of vital importance. Therefore, this paper deeply explores the image quality control methods of emergency DR In the radiology department, which has extremely important practical significance. Methods The research samples were selected from patients diagnosed with DR In the emergency department of the radiology department of our hospital. The application effects before and after implementing enhanced image quality control for emergency DR Were compared. Results The proportion of Grade A films in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group. The incidences of non-standard positioning, artifacts, and poor adjustment of density contrast were all lower than those in the control group. P < 0.05 indicates the existence of comparative significance. Conclusion By implementing the comprehensive quality control management strategy, the quality level and diagnostic accuracy of emergency DR Images in the radiology department have been effectively improved, providing patients with more high-quality and efficient medical services.
关键词
放射科;急诊 DR;图像质量;质量控制
KeyWord
Radiology department; Emergency DR; Image quality; Quality control
基金项目
页码 89-91
  • 参考文献
  • 相关文献
  • 引用本文

邝晓毅. 放射科急诊DR的图像质量控制方法探讨 [J]. 国际临床研究杂志. 2025; 9; (9). 89 - 91.

  • 文献评论

相关学者

相关机构