关注和解释疗法联合护理干预对NSCLC患者癌因性疲乏的改善作用

Pay attention to and explain the improvement effect of therapy combined with nursing intervention on cancer-related fatigue in NSCLC patients

ES评分 0

DOI 10.12208/j.cn.20260157
刊名
Contemporary Nursing
年,卷(期) 2026, 7(3)
作者
作者单位

三河市医院 河北廊坊

摘要
目的 探讨关注和解释疗法联合护理干预对非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者癌因性疲乏的改善效果。方法 本研究选取2023年6月至2024年10月收治的74例存在癌因性疲乏的NSCLC患者作为研究对象,随机分为干预组(n=37)与对照组(n=37)。干预组在常规护理基础上接受系统性关注和解释疗法联合护理干预,对照组仅接受常规护理。采用癌症疲乏量表(CFS)等工具评估干预前后两组患者的疲乏程度。结果 干预后,干预组患者CFS疲乏总评分及各维度(躯体疲乏、情感疲乏、认知疲乏)评分的降低幅度均显著大于对照组;同时,干预组疲乏改善的总有效率高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 关注和解释疗法联合护理干预能有效减轻NSCLC患者的癌因性疲乏。该联合模式可作为缓解NSCLC患者癌因性疲乏的推荐临床护理方案。
Abstract
Objective To investigate the efficacy of attention and explanation therapy plus nursing intervention in ameliorating cancer-related fatigue (CRF) among non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Methods A total of 74 NSCLC patients with CRF admitted between June 2023 and October 2024 were randomized into an intervention group (n=37) and a control group (n=37). The intervention group received routine care plus systematic attention-explanation therapy and nursing intervention, while the control group only received routine care. The Cancer Fatigue Scale (CFS) was used to evaluate fatigue levels pre- and post-intervention. Results Post-intervention, the intervention group exhibited significantly lower total CFS scores and scores across all dimensions (physical, emotional, cognitive fatigue) than the control group; additionally, the overall effective rate of fatigue improvement in the intervention group was notably higher (P<0.05). Conclusion The combination of attention and explanation therapy with nursing intervention can effectively relieve CRF in NSCLC patients and is worthy of recommendation as a clinical nursing strategy for managing CRF in this population.
关键词
关注和解释疗法联合护理;NSCLC;癌因性疲乏
KeyWord
Attention and explanation therapy combined with nursing care; NSCLC; Cancer-related fatigue
基金项目
页码 143-145
  • 参考文献
  • 相关文献
  • 引用本文

王琴. 关注和解释疗法联合护理干预对NSCLC患者癌因性疲乏的改善作用 [J]. 当代护理. 2026; 7; (3). 143 - 145.

  • 文献评论

相关学者

相关机构