肾盂输尿管连接部狭窄并发肾结石患者的预见性护理研究

A study on predictive nursing care for patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction complicated by kidney stones

ES评分 0

DOI 10.12208/j.cn.20250609
刊名
Contemporary Nursing
年,卷(期) 2025, 6(11)
作者
作者单位

喀什地区第一人民医院 新疆喀什

摘要
目的 探讨预见性护理对肾盂输尿管连接部狭窄并发肾结石患者的实际应用价值。方法 整理我院于2024年7月-2025年6月期间收治的肾盂输尿管连接部狭窄并发肾结石患者病例资料,将其随机分为参照组(常规护理,n=29)和观察组(预见性护理,n=29),比较围术期指标、并发症风险。结果 观察组各项围术期指标所需时间均短于参照组(P<0.05);观察组护理期间出血者1例,而参照组手术部位感染1例,出血2例,尿外渗1例,共计4例(P<0.05)。结论 根据肾盂输尿管连接部狭窄并发肾结石患者实际情况,在围术期间加强预见性护理,可缩短康复进程,预防并控制手术部位感染、出血等风险,整体应用价值显著。
Abstract
Objective To explore the practical application value of anticipatory nursing care for patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction complicated by kidney stones. Methods Clinical data of patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction complicated by kidney stones admitted to our hospital from July 2024 to June 2025 were collected. Patients were randomly divided into a reference group (routine care, n=29) and an observation group (anticipatory care, n=29). Perioperative indicators and risk of complications were compared. Results The time required for various perioperative indicators in the observation group was shorter than that of the reference group (P<0.05); during nursing, there was 1 case of bleeding in the observation group, while the reference group experienced 1 case of surgical site infection, 2 cases of bleeding, and 1 case of urinary extravasation, totaling 4 cases (P<0.05). Conclusion Based on the actual conditions of patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction complicated by kidney stones, strengthening anticipatory nursing care during the perioperative period can shorten the recovery process and help prevent and control risks such as surgical site infection and bleeding, demonstrating significant overall application value.
关键词
肾盂输尿管连接部狭窄;肾结石;预见性护理;不良反应
KeyWord
Ureteropelvic junction obstruction; Kidney stones; Anticipatory nursing care; Adverse reactions
基金项目
页码 167-170
  • 参考文献
  • 相关文献
  • 引用本文

陈瑞, 努尔比亚·吐米尔. 肾盂输尿管连接部狭窄并发肾结石患者的预见性护理研究 [J]. 当代护理. 2025; 6; (11). 167 - 170.

  • 文献评论

相关学者

相关机构