吸毒人员责任能力鉴定资料的分析及相关因素

Analysis of identification data of drug addicts responsibility and related factors

ES评分 0

DOI
刊名
Journal of International Psychiatry
年,卷(期) 2018, 45(5)
作者
作者单位

华中科技大学同济医学院附属精神卫生中心,武汉市精神卫生中心 ;

摘要
[摘要] 对司法鉴定科吸毒的被鉴定人的资料进行调查,分析吸毒人员责任能力鉴定的特点。 方法 回顾性分析2015年1月1日—2016年12月31日武汉市某司法鉴定所责任能力鉴定的资料,按被鉴定人是否吸毒分成两组,分为吸毒组和非吸毒组。采用自行设计的调查表,收集一般情况,诊断和刑事责任能力的结论,比较吸毒的被鉴定人的比例,特点及刑事责任能力评定的状况。结果 刑事案件的被鉴定人共271例,其中吸毒组的被鉴定人64例(23.6%)、非吸毒组的被鉴定人207例(76.4%)。吸毒组与未吸毒组在性别、年龄、婚姻状况、职业、既往史的差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。吸毒组与未吸毒组在前科上的差异有统计学意义(χ2 =6.894,P<0.01)。吸毒组的案件前三位依次为故意伤害13例(20.3%),寻衅滋事11例(17.2%),贩毒7例(10.9%)。吸毒组的诊断前三位依次为精神活性物质所致精神障碍51例(79.7%),人格障碍3例(4.7%),神经症3例(4.7%)。法学结论上,完全刑事责任能力54例(84.38%),限制刑事责任能力10例(15.62%),无刑事责任能力0例。吸毒组与未吸毒组在案件类型(χ2=59.663,P<0.01),诊断(χ2=204.395,P<0.001),刑事责任能力上的差异(χ2=17.089,P<0.001)均显著,有统计学意义。有序logistic回归显示,男性、有前科,本人申请鉴定,吸毒的被鉴定人多评为完全刑事责任能力。结论 吸毒的被鉴定人多有前科,多评为完全刑事责任能力,在案件类型、精神病诊断上与非吸毒的被鉴定人不同。
Abstract
[Abstract] Objective To research the appraised individual of drug abuse in the department of judicial identification, analyze the characteristic of responsibility identification of drug abuse. Method A retrospective analysis of the evaluation of the competence of a judicial appraisal institution in Wuhan from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2016 was conducted. According to whether the appraised individual were divided into two groups, drug group and no drug group. Using self-designed questionnaire to collect the general situation, diagnosis and criminal responsibility, to compare of the proportion of the drug addicts, the characteristics and the evaluation of criminal capacity. Results The criminal case was identified a total of 271 cases, Among them, the drug addicts were identified in 64 cases (23.6%), and the non drug addicts were identified in 207 cases (76.4%) . There was no significant difference in sex, age, marital status, occupation, past history between the drug taking group and the non drug group (p>0.05). There was significant difference between the drug group and the non drug group in the previous record (χ2=6.894, P<0.01). The top three cases of drug addicts were intentional injury in 13 cases (20.3%), stir up trouble in 11 cases (17.2%), drug trafficking in 7 cases (10.9%). The first three patients in the drug group were 51 cases of mental disorders caused by psychoactive substances (79.7%), personality disorder 3 cases (4.7%) and neurosis 3 cases (4.7%). The conclusion of the law, 54 cases of complete criminal responsibility (84.38%), limiting the ability of criminal responsibility in 10 cases (15.62%), no criminal responsibility ability of 0 cases. There were significant differences in the types of cases (χ2=59.663, P<0.01), diagnosis (chi square 2=204.395, P<0.001), and the ability of criminal responsibility (χ2=17.089, P<0.001). Ordered logistic regression shows that men, have a criminal record, I apply for identification, the appraised individual of drug addicts are rated as full criminal responsibility. Conclusion Most of the drug addicts have criminal record, and they are rated as full criminal responsibility. The two groups in different types of crime, diagnosis of mental illness.
关键词
[关键词] 吸毒;责任能力;鉴定;
KeyWord
【Key words】 Drug abuse; responsibility;psychiatric appraisal
基金项目
页码 884-887
  • 参考文献
  • 相关文献
  • 引用本文

刘伟*. 吸毒人员责任能力鉴定资料的分析及相关因素 [J]. 国际精神病学杂志. 2018; 45; (5). 884 - 887.

  • 文献评论

相关学者

相关机构