Loss Factors for Small Distributed Wind Turbines Based on Field Data in the United States-Journal of Sustainability Research-CSCIED科技核心评价数据库-手机版

Loss Factors for Small Distributed Wind Turbines Based on Field Data in the United States

Loss Factors for Small Distributed Wind Turbines Based on Field Data in the United States

ES评分 0 浏览量：200 下载量：0

DOI	10.20900/jsr20260002
刊名	Journal of Sustainability Research JSR
年，卷(期)	2026, 8(1)
作者	Lindsay M. Sheridan,Suprajha Nagaraja Sudhakar,Sarah E. Barrows,Caleb Phillips,Kevin Menear,Roy Li,Sameer Shaik,Shawn Petros,Raj K. Rai,Larry K. Berg*,Julia E. Flaherty,
作者单位	Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99354, USA ; National Laboratory of the Rockies, Golden, CO 80401, USA ;
摘要	While wind energy production loss due to turbine unavailability, environmental impacts, curtailment, and other causes has been studied and characterized at the utility-scale wind farm level, observation-based characterization of project loss is lacking for distributed wind energy, particularly for projects involving small wind turbines. Contemporary tools and research that support pre-construction distributed wind energy characterization present a wide range of default loss factors to convert gross energy estimates to net: 7–18%. Our goal is to use generation observations from operational distributed wind projects to develop more accurate representations of energy loss, along with an improved understanding of year-to-year loss variability, for this understudied sector of wind energy. Using a density-based filtering technique on distributed wind power generation timeseries, we determine periods of typical performance and use them with regression algorithms in a measure-correlate-predict fashion to simulate what the generation would have been during periods of atypical or unreported performance. From there, the actual versus predicted generation leads to the establishment of observation-informed loss factors (median = 17%) for small, single turbine installation distributed wind projects.
Abstract	While wind energy production loss due to turbine unavailability, environmental impacts, curtailment, and other causes has been studied and characterized at the utility-scale wind farm level, observation-based characterization of project loss is lacking for distributed wind energy, particularly for projects involving small wind turbines. Contemporary tools and research that support pre-construction distributed wind energy characterization present a wide range of default loss factors to convert gross energy estimates to net: 7–18%. Our goal is to use generation observations from operational distributed wind projects to develop more accurate representations of energy loss, along with an improved understanding of year-to-year loss variability, for this understudied sector of wind energy. Using a density-based filtering technique on distributed wind power generation timeseries, we determine periods of typical performance and use them with regression algorithms in a measure-correlate-predict fashion to simulate what the generation would have been during periods of atypical or unreported performance. From there, the actual versus predicted generation leads to the establishment of observation-informed loss factors (median = 17%) for small, single turbine installation distributed wind projects.
关键词	distributed wind energy; small wind turbines; energy prediction; loss assumptions
KeyWord	distributed wind energy; small wind turbines; energy prediction; loss assumptions
基金项目
页码	-

参考文献
相关文献

1.Staffell I, Green R. How does wind farm performance decline with age? Renew Energ. 2014;66:775-86. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2013.10.041.

2.Ribeiro C, Beckford T. Icing losses—what can we learn from production and meteorological data? In: WindEurope Summit 2016; 2016 Sep 27-9; Hamburg, Germany. Available from: https://windeurope.org/summit2016/conference/allfiles2/51_WindEurope2016presentation.pdf. Accessed on 15 Aug 2025.

3.El-Asha S, Zhan L, Iungo G. Quantification of power losses due to wind turbine wake interactions through SCADA, meteorological and wind LiDAR data. Wind Energy. 2017;20(11):1823-39. doi: 10.1002/we.2123.

4.Stehly T, Beiter P, Duffy P. 2019 cost of wind energy review. Golden (CO, US): National Laboratory of the Rockies; 2020. Report No.: NLR/TP-5000-78471. Available from: https://docs.nrel.gov/docs/fy21osti/78471.pdf. Accessed on 13 Aug 2025.

5.McCabe K, Prasanna A, Lockshin J, Bhaskar P, Bowen T, Baranowski R, et al. Distributed wind energy futures study. Golden (CO, US): National Laboratory of the Rockies; 2022. Report No.: NLR/TP-7A40-82519. Available from: https://docs.nrel.gov/docs/fy22osti/82519.pdf. Accessed on 13 Aug 2025.

6.National Laboratory of the Rockies (NLR). Competitiveness improvement project. Available from: https://www.nrel.gov/wind/competitiveness-improvement-project. Accessed on 15 Aug 2025.

7.Distributed Wind Energy Association (DWEA). AgWind
[data set]. Available from: https://www.agwindenergy.org/. Accessed on 13 Aug 2025.

8.National Laboratory of the Rockies (NLR). System advisor model
[data set]. Available from: https://sam.nrel.gov/. Accessed on 13 Aug 2025.

9.Technical University of Denmark (DTU). Global wind atlas
[data set]. Available from: https://globalwindatlas.info/en. Accessed on 13 Aug 2025.

10.Technical University of Denmark (DTU), DTU Wind Energy, EMD International A/S. MyWindTurbine.com
[data set]. Available from: https://www.mywindturbine.com/. Accessed on 22 Aug 2021.

11.Sheridan L, Phillips C, Orrell A, Berg L, Tinnesand H, Rai R, et al. Validation of wind resource and energy production simulations for small wind turbines in the United States. Wind Energy Sci. 2022;7(2):659-76. doi: 10.5194/wes-7-659-2022.

12.Bechmann A, Conti D, Davis N, Hansen B, Kelly M, Mortensen N, et al. MyWindTurbine—energy yield calculations. DTU Wind Energy; 2016. Report No.: DTU Wind Energy E No. 0132. Available from: https://backend.orbit.dtu.dk/ws/portalfiles/portal/126905164/Mywindturbine_DK_Validation.pdf. Accessed on 24 Aug 2025.

13.National Laboratory of the Rockies (NLR). WindWatts
[data set]. Available from: https://windwatts.nrel.gov/. Accessed on 13 Aug 2025.

14.Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL). Distributed wind project database
[data set]. Available from: https://www.pnnl.gov/distributed-wind/market-report/data. Accessed on 24 Aug 2025.

15.MathWorks. Density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise (dbscan). Available from: https://www.mathworks.com/help/stats/dbscan.html. Accessed on 19 Aug 2025.

16.Bilendo F, Meyer A, Badihi H, Lu N, Cambron P, Jiang B. Applications and modeling techniques of wind turbine power curve for wind farms—A review. Energies. 2023;16(1):180. doi: 10.3390/en16010180.

17.Hersbach H, Bell B, Berrisford P, Hirahara S, Horányi A, Muñoz-Sabater J, et al. The ERA5 global reanalysis. Q J Roy Meteorol Soc. 2020;146:1999-2049. doi: 10.1002/qj.3803.

18.Ramon J, Lledó L, Torralba V, Soret A, Doblas-Reyes F. Which global reanalysis best represents near-surface winds? Q J Roy Meteorol Soc. 2019;145:3236-51. doi: 10.1002/qj.3616.

19.Murcia J, Koivisto M, Luzia G, Olsen B, Hahmann A, Sørensen P, et al. Validation of European-scale simulated wind speed and wind generation time series. Appl Energ. 2022;305:117794. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117794.

20.European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF). ERA5 hourly data on single levels from 1940 to present
[data set]. Available from: https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/datasets/reanalysis-era5-single-levels?tab=download. Accessed on 20 Aug 2025.

21.National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). The high-resolution rapid refresh
[data set]. Available from: https://rapidrefresh.noaa.gov/hrrr/. Accessed on 10 Dec 2024.

22.Draxl C, Clifton A, Hodge B-M, McCaa J. The wind integration national dataset (WIND) toolkit. Appl Energ. 2015;151:355-66. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.03.121.

23.Buster G, Pinchuk P, Lavin L, Benton B, Bodini N. Bias correcting NOAA’s high-resolution rapid refresh (HRRR) wind resource data for grid integration applications. 2024. Available from: https://docs.nrel.gov/docs/fy25osti/91749.pdf. Accessed on 16 Jun 2025.

24.National Laboratory of the Rockies (NLR). WRDB: Wind resource database
[data set]. Available from: https://wrdb.nrel.gov/data-viewer. Accessed on 29 Jul 2025.

25.MathWorks. Fit ensemble of learners for regression (fitrensemble). Available from: https://www.mathworks.com/help/stats/fitrensemble.html. Accessed on 5 Sept 2025.

26.MathWorks. Train neural network regression model (fitrnet). Available from: https://www.mathworks.com/help/stats/fitrnet.html. Accessed on 5 Sept 2025.

27.Olauson J. ERA5: The new champion of wind power modelling? Renew Energ. 2018;126:322-31. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.03.056.

28.Wilczak J, Akish E, Capotondi A, Compo G. Evaluation and bias correction of the ERA5 reanalysis over the United States for wind and solar energy applications. Energies. 2024;17(7):1667. doi: 10.3390/en17071667.

29.Lee J, Fields J. An overview of wind-energy-production prediction bias, losses, and uncertainties. Wind Energy Sci. 2021;6(2):311-65. doi: 10.5194/wes-6-311-2021.

30.National Laboratory of the Rockies (NLR). Distributed wind installers/data
[data set]. Available from: https://openei.org/wiki/Distributed_Wind_Installers/Data. Accessed on 20 Sept 2025.

31.Brackett R. New England, Northeast start digging out from winter storm orlena. The Weather Channel. 2021 Feb 3. Available from: https://weather.com/news/news/2021-02-02-new-england-northeast-winter-storm-orlena-impacts. Accessed on 20 Sept 2025.

32.Lada B. Ida rips through mid-Atlantic with flooding rains, destructive tornadoes. AccuWeather. 2021 Sep 2. Available from: https://www.accuweather.com/en/hurricane/ida-tornadoes-flash-flood-emergency-mid-atlantic/1011038. Accessed on 20 Sept 2025.

33.Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL). WINDVALT: The distributed wind investment and valuation analysis tool
[data set]. Available from: https://windvalt.pnnl.gov. Accessed on 17 Oct 2025.

34.National Laboratory of the Rockies (NLR). 2019COE_DW100_100kW_27.6
[data set]. Available from: https://nrel.github.io/turbine-models/2019COE_DW100_100kW_27.6.html. Accessed on 19 Oct 2025.

35.Borowski J, Schwegmann S, Avila K, Dörenkämper M. Evaluating the impact of inter-annual variability on long-term wind speed predictions. Wind Energy Sci Discuss. 2025; In review. doi: 10.5194/wes-2025-117.

引用本文

Lindsay M. Sheridan,Suprajha Nagaraja Sudhakar,Sarah E. Barrows,Caleb Phillips,Kevin Menear,Roy Li,Sameer Shaik,Shawn Petros,Raj K. Rai,Larry K. Berg*,Julia E. Flaherty. Loss Factors for Small Distributed Wind Turbines Based on Field Data in the United States [J]. Journal of Sustainability Research. 2026; 8; (1). - .

文献评论

相关学者

相关机构