Feasibility Research on Tech-Based Design for Older Adults Strength Training in Indonesia-Journal of Sustainability Research-CSCIED科技核心评价数据库-手机版

Feasibility Research on Tech-Based Design for Older Adults Strength Training in Indonesia

Feasibility Research on Tech-Based Design for Older Adults Strength Training in Indonesia

ES评分 0 浏览量：95 下载量：0

DOI	10.20900/jsr20250074
刊名	Journal of Sustainability Research JSR
年，卷(期)	2025, 7(4)
作者	Elizabeth Wianto*,Maya Malinda,Hapnes Toba,Chien-Hsu Chen,
作者单位	Faculty of Humanities and Creative Industries, Maranatha Christian University, Bandung 40164, West Java, Indonesia ; Doctoral Science Program in Management, Maranatha Christian University, Bandung 40164, West Java, Indonesia ; Master Program in Computer Science, Maranatha Christian University, Bandung 40164, West Java, Indonesia ; Department of Industrial Design, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan City 70101, Taiwan ;
摘要	The rapidly aging population of Indonesia is facing different challenges in sustaining regular physical activity, specifically in strength training, due to low adherence and limited opportunities for social engagement. Therefore, this research aimed to develop and evaluate the first prototype for older adults, using Osterwalder’s Value Proposition in combination with Design Thinking to guide iterative development. A 28-day field trial was conducted with 40 active, retired participants aged 60 to 82, focusing on the feasibility of upper limb strength training through group-based technology-assisted exercise. The participant experiences were collected qualitatively through individual interviews and analyzed thematically according to the Value Proposition Design (VPD) framework. The results showed that participants more readily articulated perceived benefits, such as enhanced social connection and opportunities for muscle training than barriers including reluctance or discomfort. Even though direct simultaneous exercise was limited by personal routines, the sense of connectedness was highly valued. Moreover, technology-facilitated group exercise devices were well-received by older adults when clear benefits were communicated, reporting the potential to enhance health-conscious communities and improve physical and social well-being. Future research could show the types and degrees of social interaction that most effectively promoted ongoing participation in physical activity among older adults.
Abstract	The rapidly aging population of Indonesia is facing different challenges in sustaining regular physical activity, specifically in strength training, due to low adherence and limited opportunities for social engagement. Therefore, this research aimed to develop and evaluate the first prototype for older adults, using Osterwalder’s Value Proposition in combination with Design Thinking to guide iterative development. A 28-day field trial was conducted with 40 active, retired participants aged 60 to 82, focusing on the feasibility of upper limb strength training through group-based technology-assisted exercise. The participant experiences were collected qualitatively through individual interviews and analyzed thematically according to the Value Proposition Design (VPD) framework. The results showed that participants more readily articulated perceived benefits, such as enhanced social connection and opportunities for muscle training than barriers including reluctance or discomfort. Even though direct simultaneous exercise was limited by personal routines, the sense of connectedness was highly valued. Moreover, technology-facilitated group exercise devices were well-received by older adults when clear benefits were communicated, reporting the potential to enhance health-conscious communities and improve physical and social well-being. Future research could show the types and degrees of social interaction that most effectively promoted ongoing participation in physical activity among older adults.
关键词	gerontechnology; Indonesian older adult; Osterwalder’s Value Proposition Design; prototype design iteration; sustainable strength training
KeyWord	gerontechnology; Indonesian older adult; Osterwalder’s Value Proposition Design; prototype design iteration; sustainable strength training
基金项目
页码	-

参考文献
相关文献

1.Júnior FAPL, Barbosa RGB, Diniz JL, Araújo WCO, Marques MB, Coutinho JFV. Profile and functional capacity of long-lived people: Integrative review (Perfil e capacidade funcional de pessoas longevas: Revisão integrativa). Rev Enferm UERJ. 2021;29(1):e59737.

2.Kim H, Lee T, Lee S, Kim K, Lee S, Kam S, et al. Factors associated with ADL and IADL dependency among Korean centenarians: Reaching the 100-year-old life transition. Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2012;74(3):243-64.

3.Wu T, Lu L, Luo L, Guo Y, Ying L, Tao Q, et al. Factors associated with activities of daily life disability among centenarians in rural Chongqing, China: A cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(1):1364.

4.Steen G, Sonn U, Hanson AB, Steen B. Cognitive function and functional ability. a cross-sectional and longitudinal study at ages 85 and 95 in a non-demented population. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2014;13:68-77.

5.Hoogendijk EO, Romero L, Sánchez-Jurado PM, Ruano TF, Viña J, Rodríguez-Mañas L, et al. A new functional classification based on frailty and disability stratifies the risk for mortality among older adults: The FRADEA study. JAMDA. 2019;20(9):1105-10.

6.ESCAP. Indonesia, Section I: Demographic indicators. Bangkok (Thailand): The United Nations Economic and Social Commision for Asia and the Pacific; 2023.

7.Adioetomo SM, Mujahid G. Indonesia on the threshold of population ageing. Jakarta (Indonesia): UNFPA Indonesia; 2014.

8.Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 11 tahun 2017 tentang Manajemen Pegawai Negeri Sipil. Jakarta (Indonesia): Kementrian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia; 2017. p. 128.

9.Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 88 Tahun 2021 tentang strategi nasional kelanjutusiaan. Jakarta (Indonesia): Kementrian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia; 2021. p. 10.

10.Lu S. Functional ability and its associated factors among Chinese people aged 50 years and above from the perspective of healthy aging: A 7-year longitudinal study. J Aging Soc Policy. 2023;37(2):289-304.

11.Bennett JA, Winters-Stone K. Motivating older adults to exercise: What works? Age Ageing. 2011;40(2):148-9.

12.Wianto E, Chen Y-H, Chang C-Y, Kaburuan ER, Lin Y-C, Chen C-H, editors. Enhancing quality of life based on physical activity for Indonesian elderly: A preliminary study for design recommendation. In: CONMEDIA 2019; Bali, Indonesia. The Anvaya Beach Resort Bali (Indonesia): Curran Associates Inc.; 2009.

13.Notthoff N, Carstensen LL. Positive messaging promotes walking in older adults. Psychol Aging. 2014;29(2):329-41.

14.Meier NF, Lee D-C. Physical activity and sarcopenia in older adults. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2020;32:1675-87.

15.Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Bahat G, Bauer J, Boirie Y, Bruyère O, Cederholm T, et al. Sarcopenia: Revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing. 2019;48(1):16-31.

16.Yang W, Tian G, Cui Y, Li R, Zhou T, Shi Y, et al. Associations between activities of daily living, leisure activities and subjective well-being in Chinese older adults. Gerodontology. 2023;41(3):415-23.

17.Gellert P, Ziegelmann JP, Warner LM, Schwarzer R. Physical activity intervention in older adults: Does a participating partner make a difference? Eur J Ageing. 2011;8(3):211.

18.Tam HL, Choi KC, Lau Y, Leung LYL, Chan ASW, Zhou L, et al. Re-engagement in physical activity slows the decline in older adults’ well-being—A longitudinal study. INQUIRY The J Health Care Organ Provis Financ. 2025;62:00469580251314776.

19.Zhang H, Hao X, Qin Y, Yang Y, Zhao X, Wu S, et al. Social participation classification and activities in association with health outcomes among older adults: Results from a scoping review. J Adv Nurs. 2024;81(2):661-78.

20.Sinha S, Verma A, Tiwari P. Technology: Saving and enriching life during covid-19. Front Psychol. 2021;12:647681.

21.Prensky MH. Sapiens digital: From digital immigrants and digital natives to digital wisdom. Innovate J Online Educ. 2009;5(3):1.

22.Foss NJ, Saebi T. Business models and business model innovation: Between wicked and paradigmatic problems. Long Range Plann. 2017;51(1):9-21.

23.Verganti R, Vendraminelli L, Iansiti M. Innovation and design in the age of artificial intelligence. J Prod Innov Manag. 2020;37(3):212-27.

24.Kabir SMS. Basic guidelines for research: An introductory approach for all disciplines. Chittagong (Bangladesh): Book Zone Publication; 2016.

25.Osterwalder A, Pigneur Y, Bernarda G, Smith A. Value proposition design. Hoboken (NJ, USA): John Wiley & Sons; 2014.

26.Piepponen A, Ritala P, Keränen J, Maijanen P. Digital transformation of the value proposition: a single case study in the media industry. J Bus Res. 2022;150:311-25.

27.Kolomoyets Y, Dickinger A. Understanding value perceptions and propositions: A machine learning approach. J Bus Res. 2023;154:113355.

28.Lanzalonga F, Oppioli M, Mas FD, Secinaro S. Drones in Venice: Exploring business model applications for disruptive mobility and stakeholders’ value proposition. J Clean Prod. 2023;423:138764.

29.Osterwalder A, Pigneur Y, Bernarda G, Smith A, Papadakos T. Value proposition design how to create products and services customers want. J Bus Models. 2015;3(1). doi: 10.5278/ojs.jbm.v3i1.1105.

30.Volkova T, Jakobsone I. Design thinking as a business tool to ensure continuous value generation. Intellect Econ. 2016;10:63-9.

31.Berenguer A, Goncalves J, Hosio S, Ferreira D, Anagnostopoulos T, Kostakos V. Are smartphones ubiquitous? An in-depth survey of smartphone adoption by seniors. IEEE Consum Electron Mag. 2017;6(2):104-10.

32.Lermen FH, Moura PKd, Bertoni VB, Graciano P, Tortorella GL. Does maturity level influence the use of agile UX methods by digital startups? evaluating design thinking, lean startup, and lean user experience. Inf Softw Technol. 2023;154:107107.

33.Harih G, Dolšak B. Tool-handle design based on a digital human hand model. Int J Ind Ergonomics. 2013;43(4):288-95.

34.Wianto E, Chen C-H, Defi IR, Sartika EM, Hangkawidjaja AD, Lin Y-C, editors. Understanding interactivity for the strength-training needs of the elderly at nursing homes in indonesia. In: Synergy-DRS International Conference; 2020 Aug 11-4; Held online; 2020.

35.Arovah NI, Heesch KC. The association between cardiorespiratory fitness and metabolic syndrome diagnosis: A cross-sectional study in Indonesian middle-aged and older adults. Phys Act Rev. 2021;9(2):101-10.

36.Sousa-Santos AR, Amaral TF. Differences in handgrip strength protocols to identify sarcopenia and frailty—A systematic review. BMC Geriatr. 2017;17(1):238.

37.Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edition. Mahwah (NJ, US): Lawrence Erbaum Associates; 1988.

38.Reis P, Moro A, Bins Ely V, Fernandes C, Vilagra J, Peres L, et al. Universal design and accessibility: An approach of the influence of muscle strength loss in the risk of falls in the elderly. Work J Prev Assessm Rehabil. 2012;41(Suppl 1):374-9.

39.Carr K, Weir PL, Azar D, Azar NR. Universal design: a step toward successful aging. J Aging Res. 2013;2013(1):324624.

40.Hassenzahl M, Eckoldt K, Diefenbach S, laschke M, lenz E, Kim J. Designing moments of meaning and pleasure experience design and happiness. Int J Design. 2013;7(3):21-31.

41.Czaja SJ, Boot WR, Charness N, Rogers WA, Sharit J. Improving social support for older adults through technology: Findings from the prism randomized controlled trial. The Gerontologist. 2017;58(3):467-77.

42.Liang T-P, Ho Y-T, Li Y-W, Turban E. What drives social commerce: The role of social support and relationship quality. Int J Electron Commer. 2014;16(2):69-90.

43.Sung P, Chia A, Chan A, Malhotra R. Reciprocal relationship between lifelong learing and volunteering among other adults. The J Gerontol Ser B. 2023;78(5):902-12.

44.Steiner T. Sensors for the web 2021. Available from: https://developer.chrome.com/articles/generic-sensor/. Accessed on 4 Aug 2024.

45.Schrift D. Upper body exercises for seniors and the elderly, strength training for seniors. Eldergym Fitness for Seniors. San Bruno (CA, US): YouTube; 2019.

46.Wianto E, Toba H, Chen C-H, Malinda M, editors. Sensor-based data acquisition via ubiquitous device to detect muscle strength training activities. In: Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AHFE 2023); 2023; San Francisco CA, USA. New York (NY, US): AHFE Open Access; 2023.

47.Toba H, Wianto E, Malinda M, Halim AWA, Chen C-H, editors. Cluster dominance analysis of strength training motion characteristics. In: 2023 IEEE 12th Global Conference on Consumer Electronics (GCCE); 2023 Oct 10-3; Nara, Japan.

48.What is wear OS on the galaxy watch4? SAMSUNG; 2024. Available from: https://www.samsung.com/uk/support/mobile-devices/wear-os/. Accessed on 26 Apr 2024.

引用本文

Elizabeth Wianto*,Maya Malinda,Hapnes Toba,Chien-Hsu Chen. Feasibility Research on Tech-Based Design for Older Adults Strength Training in Indonesia [J]. Journal of Sustainability Research. 2025; 7; (4). - .

文献评论

相关学者

相关机构