Preservation and Renewal: Examining Organizational Innovation Behavior in the Context of Sustainability, Social Responsibility, and Environmentally Conscious Management-Journal of Sustainability Research-CSCIED科技核心评价数据库-手机版

Preservation and Renewal: Examining Organizational Innovation Behavior in the Context of Sustainability, Social Responsibility, and Environmentally Conscious Management

Preservation and Renewal: Examining Organizational Innovation Behavior in the Context of Sustainability, Social Responsibility, and Environmentally Conscious Management

ES评分 0 浏览量：57 下载量：0

全文阅读下载引用收藏

DOI	10.20900/jsr20250076
刊名	Journal of Sustainability Research JSR
年，卷(期)	2025, 7(4)
作者	Péter Karácsony,Vivien Valkó*,Gabriel Gencsi,
作者单位	Department of Marketing, Management and Methodology, Keleti Károly Faculty of Business and Management, Obuda University, Tavaszmező str. 15-17, Budapest 1086, Hungary ; Institute of Economics and Management, Faculty of Economics, Health Sciences and Social Studies, Károli Gáspár University of the Reformed Church in ; Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Informatics, J. Selye University, Bratislavská cesta 3322, Komárno 94501, Slovakia ;
摘要	The concept of sustainability, social responsibility, and environmentally conscious management, as well as the organizational innovation offers numerous economic and social benefits for both employers and employees. The aim of the research was to assess the innovation behavior organizations operating in the Hungarian small and medium-sized enterprises sector (SMEs) in relation to sustainability and environmentally conscious management, with a particular focus on size, sector, leadership attitudes, styles, and the involvement and activity of employees in innovation. The aim is to explore the fundamental relationships and differences in the application of sustainability practices along these dimensions. The empirical research was conducted using a quantitative research method, through a questionnaire survey. A total of 1385 valid responses were collected. Regression analysis and Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric test were used for statistical analysis of the hypotheses. The results shows that there are significant differences between companies in terms of innovation policies and applied sustainability practices of Hungarian SMEs. Companies differ significantly in their approach to environmentally conscious management and the application of sustainable practices based on company size, on leadership style, employee involvement in innovation.
Abstract	The concept of sustainability, social responsibility, and environmentally conscious management, as well as the organizational innovation offers numerous economic and social benefits for both employers and employees. The aim of the research was to assess the innovation behavior organizations operating in the Hungarian small and medium-sized enterprises sector (SMEs) in relation to sustainability and environmentally conscious management, with a particular focus on size, sector, leadership attitudes, styles, and the involvement and activity of employees in innovation. The aim is to explore the fundamental relationships and differences in the application of sustainability practices along these dimensions. The empirical research was conducted using a quantitative research method, through a questionnaire survey. A total of 1385 valid responses were collected. Regression analysis and Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric test were used for statistical analysis of the hypotheses. The results shows that there are significant differences between companies in terms of innovation policies and applied sustainability practices of Hungarian SMEs. Companies differ significantly in their approach to environmentally conscious management and the application of sustainable practices based on company size, on leadership style, employee involvement in innovation.
关键词	organizational innovation behavior; sustainability; environmentally conscious management; Hungary; SMEs
KeyWord	organizational innovation behavior; sustainability; environmentally conscious management; Hungary; SMEs
基金项目
页码	-

参考文献
相关文献

1.Surman V, Böcskei E. Fenntarthatóság a magyar kis-, és középvállalati szektorban (Sustainability in the Hungarian small and medium-sized enterprise sector). Vezetestudomány/Budapest Manag Rev. 2023;54(10):15-28. doi: 10.14267/VEZTUD.2023.10.02.

2.Guan X, Ahmad N, Sial MS, Cherian J, Han H. CSR and organizational performance: The role of pro-environmental behavior and personal values. Corp Soc Resp Environ Manag. 2023;30:677-94. doi: 10.1002/csr.2381.

3.Martos-Pedrero A, Jiménez-Castillo D, Ferrón-Vílchez V, Cortés-García FJ. Corporate social responsibility and export performance under stakeholder view: The mediation of innovation and the moderation of the legal form. Corp Soc Resp Environ Manag. 2023;30:248-66. doi: 10.1002/csr.2352.

4.AlKoliby ISM, Abdullah HH, Suki NM. Linking knowledge application, digital marketing, and manufacturing SMEs’ sustainable performance: The mediating role of innovation. J Knowl Econ. 2024;15(2):6151-77. doi: 10.1108/APJBA-09-2021-0480.

5.Garai-Fodor M, Huszak N. Consumer awareness: Environmental consciousness, conscious lifestyle among generation z based on primary data. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica. 2024;21(12):73-87. doi: 10.12700/APH.21.12.2024.12.5.

6.Ofori-Baafi PK, Opoku MO. Resource-based view factors driving SME growth: A systematic review. Int J Manag Organ. 2025;2(4):56-77. doi: 10.30209/IJMO.202402.013.

7.Hassan SS, Meisner K, Krause K, Bzhalava L, Moog P. Is digitalization a source of innovation? Exploring the role of digital diffusion in SME innovation performance. Small Bus Econ. 2024;62(4):1469-91. doi: 10.1007/s11187-023-00826-7.

8.Hitka M, Schmidtová J, Lorincová S, Štarchoň P, Weberová D, Kampf R. Sustainability of human resource management processes through employee motivation and job satisfaction. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica. 2021;18(2):7-26. doi: 10.12700/APH.18.2.2021.2.1.

9.Chen H, Amoako T, Quansah CE, Danso SA, Jidda DJ. Assessment of the impact of management commitment and supply chain integration on SMEs’ innovation performance: Moderation role of government support. Heliyon. 2023;9(5):e15914. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15914.

10.Bilal M, Xicang Z, Jiying W, Sohu JM, Akhtar S, Hassan MIU. Digital transformation and SME innovation: A comprehensive analysis of mediating and moderating effects. J Knowl Econ. 2025;16(1):1153-82. doi: 10.1007/s13132-024-02054-0.

11.Lee MJ, Choi H, Roh T. Is institutional pressure the driver for green business model innovation of SMEs? Mediating and moderating roles of regional innovation intermediaries. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2024;209:123814. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123814.

12.Lewandowska A. Interactions between investments in innovation and SME competitiveness in the peripheral regions. J Int Stud. 2021;14(1):285-307. doi: 10.14254/2071-8330.2021/14-1/20.

13.Acemoglu D, Akcigit U, Celik MA. Radical and incremental innovation: The roles of firms, managers, and innovators. Am Econ J Macroecon. 2022;14(3):199-249. doi: 10.1257/mac.20170410.

14.Rideg A, Szerb L, Varga AR. The role of intellectual capital on innovation: Evidence from Hungarian SMEs. Tec Empresarial. 2023;17(2):1-19. doi: 10.18845/te.v17i2.6695.

15.Karácsony P, Tsoy A, Meszaros J, Nurgaliyeva K. Analysis of factors influencing innovation of Hungarian small and medium-sized enterprises. Probl Perspect Manag. 2025;23(1):635. doi: 10.21511/ppm.23(1).2025.47.

16.Karácsony P, Kireyeva A, Valkó V, Nurbatsin A. The impact of knowledge management practices on innovation in logistics and distribution enterprises in hungary. J Distrib Sci. 2025;23(5):13-25. doi: 10.15722/jds.23.05.202505.13.

17.Anzules-Falcones W, Novillo-Villegas S. Innovation capacity, entrepreneurial orientation, and flexibility: An analysis from industrial SMEs in Ecuador. Sustainability. 2023;15(13):10321. doi: 10.3390/su151310321.

18.Robert M, Le Goff R, Mignon S, Giuliani P. Decoding the significant role of social context in SMEs’ implementation of management innovation during the digital revolution. Ann Oper Res. 2025;348(3):1953-87. doi: 10.1007/s10479-023-05292-8.

19.Khosravi P, Newton C, Rezvani A, Ghanbarzadeh R, Akbari M. Thriving in management innovation: An institutional perspective. Eur J Innov Manag. 2024;27(8):2886-904. doi: 10.1108/EJIM-09-2022-0524.

20.Lesáková Ľ. Evaluating innovations in small and medium enterprises in slovakia. Procedia-Soc Behav Sci. 2014;110:74-81. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.849.

21.Camilleri MA, Troise C, Strazzullo S, Bresciani S. Creating shared value through open innovation approaches: Opportunities and challenges for corporate sustainability. Bus Strat Env. 2023;32:4485-502. doi: 10.1002/bse.3377.

22.Lesákova Ľ. Small and medium enterprises and eco-innovations: Empirical study of Slovak SME’s. Mark Manag Innov. 2019;3:89-97. doi: 10.21272/mmi.2019.3-07.

23.Parrilli MD, Balavac-Orlic M, Radicic D. Eco-innovation across SMEs in European macro-regions. J Clean Prod. 2025;494:144964. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.144964.

24.Phonthanukitithaworn C, Srisathan WA, Ketkaew C, Naruetharadhol P. Sustainable development towards openness Sme innovation: Taking advantage of intellectual capital, sustainable initiatives, and open innovation. Sustainability. 2023;15(3):2126. doi: 10.3390/su15032126.

25.Khan AN, Mehmood K, Kwan HK. Green knowledge management: A key driver of green technology innovation and sustainable performance in the construction organizations. J Innov Knowl. 2024;9(1):100455. doi: 10.1016/j.jik.2023.100455.

26.Rubio-Andrés M, Del Mar Ramos-González M, Sastre-Castillo MÁ, Gutiérrez-Broncano S. Stakeholder pressure and innovation capacity of SMEs in the covid-19 pandemic: Mediating and multigroup analysis. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2023;190:122432. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122432.

27.Avelar S, Borges-Tiago T, Almeida A, Tiago F. Confluence of sustainable entrepreneurship, innovation, and digitalization in SMEs. J Bus Res. 2024;170:114346. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114346.

28.Piwowar-Sulej K, Iqbal Q, Dagar V, Singh S. Employees’ eco-friendly innovative behaviors: Examining the role of individual and situational factors. Eur Manag J. 2024;43(4):676-85. doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2024.04.005.

29.Farhan BY. Visionary leadership and innovative mindset for sustainable business development: Case studies and practical applications. Res Glob. 2024;8:100219. doi: 10.1016/j.resglo.2024.100219.

30.Thelma CC, Chitondo L. Leadership for sustainable development in Africa: A comprehensive perspective. Int J Res Public. 2024;5(2):2395-410.

31.Rauter R, Globocnik D, Perl-Vorbach E, Baumgartner RJ. Open innovation and its effects on economic and sustainability innovation performance. J Innov Knowl. 2019;4(4):226-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jik.2018.03.004.

32.Bradley P, Parry G, O’Regan N. A framework to explore the functioning and sustainability of business models. Sustain Prod Consum. 2020;21:57-77. doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2019.10.007.

33.Bencsik A, Pangsy-Kania S. Sustainable leadership practices based on the logic of the honeybee pyramid—comparison of Hungarian and polish SMEs. Sustainability. 2023;15(17):13103. doi: 10.3390/su151713103.

34.Cuhadar S, Rudnák I. Literature review: Sustainable leadership. Studia Mundi–Economica. 2022;9(3):55-65. doi: 10.18531/Studia.Mundi.2022.09.03.55-65.

35.Valdez Juarez LE, Ramos Escobar EA, Guzmán GM. The effects of absorptive capacity, intellectual property and innovation in SMEs. J Mgmt Sustain. 2017;7:36. doi: 10.5539/jms.v7n4p36.

36.Liao Y. Sustainable leadership: A literature review and prospects for future research. Front Psychol. 2022;13:1045570. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1045570.

37.Maguate GS, Kilag OKT, Alegre AB, Alegre JMD, Rubin AMM, Ortiz JGB. Understanding sustainable leadership: A review and forward outlook. Int Multidiscip J Res Innov Sustain Excell. 2024;1(6):573-82. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.11519443.

38.Ningrum RW. Shaping a suitable leadership style for startup business’ founder: A review. Innov Technol Entrep J. 2025;2(1):15-24. doi: 10.31603/itej.13167.

39.Merín-Rodrigáñez J, Alegre J, Dasí À. International entrepreneurship in innovative SMEs: Examining the connection between CEOs’ dynamic managerial capabilities, business model innovation and export performance. Int Bus Rev. 2025;34(2):102321. doi: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2024.102321.

40.Muenjohn N, McMurray AJ, Kim J, Afshari L. Workplace innovation and work value ethics: The mediating role of leadership in Asian SMEs. J Innov Knowl. 2024;9(3):100547. doi: 10.1016/j.jik.2024.100547.

41.Shmelev SE, Gilardi E. Corporate environmental, social, and governance performance: The impacts on financial returns, business model innovation, and social transformation. Sustainability. 2025;17:1286. doi: 10.3390/su17031286.

42.Shmelev SE, Gilardi E. Sustainable business as a force for good in the context of climate change: An econometric modelling approach. Sustainability. 2025;17(4):1530. doi: 10.3390/su17041530.

43.Zhu J, Huang F. Transformational leadership, organizational innovation, and ESG performance: Evidence from SMEs in China. Sustainability. 2023;15(7):5756. doi: 10.3390/su15075756.

44.Gumusluoğlu L, Ilsev A. Transformational leadership and organizational innovation: The roles of internal and external support for innovation. J Prod Innov Manag. 2009;26(3):264-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2009.00657.x.

45.Paulsen N, Maldonado D, Callan VJ, Ayoko O. Charismatic leadership, change and innovation in an R&D organization. J Organ Change Manag. 2009;22(5):511-23. doi: 10.1108/09534810910983479.

46.Ur Rehman K, Anwar RS, Antohi VM, Ali U, Fortea C, Zlati LM. Driving frugal innovation in SMEs: How sustainable leadership, knowledge sources and information credibility make a difference. Front Sociol. 2024;9:1344704. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2024.1344704.

47.Rousselière S, Coisnon T, Hassan M, Musson A, Rousselière D. Beyond porter hypothesis: Empirical evidence of heterogeneous and contextual economic returns of eco-innovations on a sample of European SMEs. J Clean Prod. 2024;484:144329. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144329.

48.Zheng LJ, Zhang JZ, Lee LYS, Jasimuddin SM, Kamal MM. Digital technology integration in business model innovation for carbon neutrality: An evolutionary process model for SMEs. J Environ Manag. 2024;359:120978. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120978.

49.Shahin V, Alimohammadlou M, Abbasi A. Identifying and prioritizing the barriers to green innovation in SMEs and the strategies to counteract the barriers: An interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy approach. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2024;204:123408. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123408.

50.Sarango-Lalangui P, Castillo-Vergara M, Carrasco-Carvajal O, Durendez A. Impact of environmental sustainability on open innovation in SMEs: An empirical study considering the moderating effect of gender. Heliyon. 2023;9(9):e20096. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20096.

51.Dzurov Vargová T, Matušíková D. Perception of the importance of applying environmental innovations to tourism businesses in Slovakia. Sustainability. 2025;17(6):2549. doi: 10.3390/su17062549.

52.Filčák R, Škobla D. Decarbonization and the structural challenges of the neoliberal state: The case of the coal region in Slovakia. Green Low-Carbon Econ. 2025;3(2):151-8. doi: 10.47852/bonviewGLCE42022597.

53.Lima O, Fernandes G, Tereso A. Benefits of adopting innovation and sustainability practices in project management within the SME context. Sustainability. 2023;15(18):13411. doi: 10.3390/su151813411.

54.Domaracká L, Kowal B, Matušková S, Čulková K, Taušová M. Comparative analysis of eco-innovation index—A case study of Slovakia, Czech Republic, and Poland. Sustainability. 2025;17(13):5797. doi: 10.3390/su17135797.

55.Mengxuan T, Khan K, Cifuentes-Faura J, Sukumaran S. Technological innovation and energy efficiency in central eastern European countries. Util Policy. 2024;88:101761. doi: 10.1016/j.jup.2024.101761.

56.IBM Corp. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 27.0. Armonk (NY, US): IBM Corp.; 2020.

引用本文

Péter Karácsony,Vivien Valkó*,Gabriel Gencsi. Preservation and Renewal: Examining Organizational Innovation Behavior in the Context of Sustainability, Social Responsibility, and Environmentally Conscious Management [J]. Journal of Sustainability Research. 2025; 7; (4). - .

文献评论

相关学者

相关机构