International Journal of Clinical Research

Objective This study aims to investigate and analyze the self-evaluation and self-evaluation of humanistic qualities among undergraduate nursing students at a clinical medical college in Xinjiang, and to identify the differences between the two and the possible reasons for the differences. The goal is to adjust the mode of humanistic education for undergraduate nursing students and provide reference for promoting humanistic education that is closer to the needs of patients. Methods This study conducted a questionnaire survey using both “self-evaluation” and “peer evaluation” methods. The evaluation selected the “Human Care Ability Scale for Nursing College Students” developed by Huang Gebing, and conducted a questionnaire survey on 82 undergraduate students. Results The self-evaluation results showed that the total score of humanistic care ability was (112.45 ± 12.48) points; The results of the “He Ping” evaluation showed that the score of students humanistic care behavior was (96.29 ± 15.32) points, (P<0.05). Conclusion The results of students’ self-evaluation of their humanistic care ability are higher than those of their self-evaluation of their humanistic care ability. Both evaluation methods show that students humanistic care ability is generally low. Therefore, it is necessary to increase the training of humanistic care ability for nursing students, observe more in clinical practice, explore practical and effective training strategies, improve students humanistic care ability, and better improve patient satisfaction in work.

Nursing; Undergraduate students; Humanistic care; Self-evaluation