经皮椎间孔镜下髓核摘除术治疗腰间盘突出症的效果观察

Observation on the effect of percutaneous intervertebral foraminoscopic extraction of nucleus pulposus for lumbar disc herniation

ES评分 0

DOI 10.12208/j.ijcr.20250085
刊名
International Journal of Clinical Research
年,卷(期) 2025, 9(2)
作者
作者单位

长春中德骨科医院 吉林长春

摘要
目的 明确经皮椎间孔镜下髓核摘除术治疗腰间盘突出症的效果。方法 研究纳入2023年9月-2024年9月中综合临床各项检查结果满足腰间盘突出症诊断标准的30例患者,以随机数字表法安排为两组,对照组与观察组分别15例患者,对照组行常规手术方案干预,观察组行经皮椎间孔镜下髓核摘除术干预,对不同干预效果进行比较分析。结果 干预后观察组总不良事件例数占比更少、治疗后观察组疼痛程度数据值更低、观察组临床指标各数据值更低,P值结果<0.05,统计学差异大。结论 于腰间盘突出症患者中施以经皮椎间孔镜下髓核摘除术措施,有利于减少不良事件风险,增强疼痛减轻效果,让患者尽早出院。
Abstract
Objective To determine the effect of percutaneous intervertebral foraminoscopic extraction of nucleus pulposus in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation. Methods A total of 30 patients who met the diagnostic criteria for lumbar disc herniation from 2023.09 to 2024.09 were included in the study and divided into two groups by random number table method, 15 patients in the control group and observation group respectively. The control group received conventional surgical intervention, and the observation group received percutaneous intervertebral foraminoscopy nucleus pulposus extraction intervention. The effects of different interventions were compared and analyzed. Results After intervention, the proportion of total adverse events in the observation group was less, the pain degree of the observation group was lower, and the clinical indicators of the observation group were lower, and the P-value was <0.05, indicating a significant statistical difference. Conclusion Percutaneous intervertebral foraminoscopic extraction of nucleus pulposus in patients with lumbar disc herniation is beneficial to reduce the risk of adverse events, enhance the effect of pain relief, and enable patients to leave hospital as soon as possible.
关键词
腰间盘突出症;经皮椎间孔镜下髓核摘除术;不良事件
KeyWord
Lumbar disc herniation; Percutaneous intervertebral foraminoscopic extraction of nucleus pulposus; Adverse event
基金项目
页码 100-102
  • 参考文献
  • 相关文献
  • 引用本文

张治民*. 经皮椎间孔镜下髓核摘除术治疗腰间盘突出症的效果观察 [J]. 国际临床研究杂志. 2025; 9; (2). 100 - 102.

  • 文献评论

相关学者

相关机构