核磁共振诊断膝关节半月板损伤的临床意义分析
Clinical significance analysis of magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis of meniscus injury in knee joint
ES评分 0
| DOI |
10.12208/j.ijcr.20250090 |
| 刊名 |
International Journal of Clinical Research
|
| 年，卷(期) |
2025, 9(2) |
| 作者 |
|
| 作者单位 |
大名县人民医院 河北邯郸
|
| 摘要 |
目的 探究核磁共振技术在诊断膝关节半月板损伤的实际成效。方法 选取2023年10月至2024年10月期间，在我院接受诊疗的130例疑患膝关节半月板损伤病例作为研究样本，所有患者均接受核磁共振与关节镜的双重检查。将关节镜的检查结果视为诊断的金标准，对比核磁共振及关节镜在半月板损伤的检出情况及半月板损伤分级的检出情况上的差异。结果 核磁共振与关节镜的半月板损伤检出率分别为91.54%、93.85%，两组无明显差异（P>0.05）；核磁共振与关节镜的半月板损伤分级检出率也无明显差异（P>0.05）。结论 核磁共振在诊断膝关节半月板损伤方面具有与关节镜相近的准确性和可靠性，且其无创、无辐射的特点使其成为膝关节半月板损伤的首选诊断方法。
|
| Abstract |
Objective To explore the practical effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging technology in diagnosing meniscus injuries in the knee joint. Methods 130 suspected cases of knee meniscus injury treated in our hospital from October 2023 to October 2024 were selected as the study sample. All patients underwent dual examinations of magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopy. Regard the results of arthroscopy as the gold standard for diagnosis, and compare the differences in the detection and grading of meniscus injuries between magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopy. Results The detection rates of meniscus injury by magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopy were 91.54% and 93.85%, respectively, with no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05); There was no significant difference in the detection rate of meniscus injury grading between magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopy (P>0.05). Conclusion Magnetic resonance imaging has similar accuracy and reliability to arthroscopy in diagnosing meniscus injuries in the knee joint, and its non-invasive and non radiative characteristics make it the preferred diagnostic method for meniscus injuries in the knee joint.
|
| 关键词 |
核磁共振；膝关节；半月板损伤；关节镜；诊断准确性
|
| KeyWord |
Nuclear magnetic resonance; Knee joint; Meniscus injury; Arthroscopy; Diagnostic accuracy
|
| 基金项目 |
|
| 页码 |
116-118 |
李新立*.
核磁共振诊断膝关节半月板损伤的临床意义分析 [J].
国际临床研究杂志.
2025; 9; (2).
116 - 118.