急诊护理快速通道对急性脑卒中救治时间及治疗效果的影响分析

Analysis of the impact of emergency nursing fast track on the treatment time and efficacy of acute stroke

ES评分 0

DOI 10.12208/j.ijcr.20250148
刊名
International Journal of Clinical Research
年,卷(期) 2025, 9(3)
作者
作者单位

上海市杨浦区市东医院 上海,上海市杨浦区市东医院 上海

摘要
目的 分析急诊护理快速通道用于急性脑卒中的价值。方法 随机均分2022年9月-2024年8月本院接诊急性脑卒中病人(n=74)。试验组采取急诊护理快速通道,对照组行常规护理。对比救治时间等指标。结果 关于静脉用药时间、急救时间与确诊到抢救时间:试验组(2.29±0.35)min、(51.74±5.34)min、(22.58±2.39)min,对照组(4.74±0.62)min、(65.38±4.04)min、(35.08±4.27)min,差异显著(P<0.05)。家属满意度:试验组97.3%,对照组78.38%,差异显著(P<0.05)。抢救成功率与致残率:试验组100.0%、8.11%,对照组89.19%、29.73%,差异显著(P<0.05)。结论 急性脑卒中用急诊护理快速通道,病人的救治时间更短,救治效果也更好,家属满意度更高。
Abstract
Objective To analyze the value of emergency nursing fast track in the treatment of acute stroke. Methods Randomly divide acute stroke patients (n=74) admitted to our hospital from September 2022 to August 2024. The experimental group received emergency nursing fast track care, while the control group received routine nursing care. Compare indicators such as treatment time. Results Regarding the duration of intravenous medication, emergency treatment, and the time from diagnosis to rescue, the experimental group had (2.29 ± 0.35) min, (51.74 ± 5.34) min, and (22.58 ± 2.39) min, while the control group had (4.74 ± 0.62) min, (65.38 ± 4.04) min, and (35.08 ± 4.27) min, with significant differences (P<0.05). Family satisfaction: 97.3% in the experimental group and 78.38% in the control group, with a significant difference (P<0.05). The success rate of rescue and disability rate were 100.0% and 8.11% in the experimental group, and 89.19% and 29.73% in the control group, with significant differences (P<0.05). Conclusion The use of emergency nursing fast track for acute stroke patients results in shorter treatment time, better treatment outcomes, and higher satisfaction.
关键词
急性脑卒中;满意度;急诊护理快速通道;救治时间
KeyWord
Acute stroke; Satisfaction; Emergency nursing fast track; Rescue time
基金项目
页码 124-126
  • 参考文献
  • 相关文献
  • 引用本文

李雅,杨晶*. 急诊护理快速通道对急性脑卒中救治时间及治疗效果的影响分析 [J]. 国际临床研究杂志. 2025; 9; (3). 124 - 126.

  • 文献评论

相关学者

相关机构