Contemporary Nursing

Objective To explore nursing interventions and their effects on patients with sleep apnea syndrome. Methods 100 patients with sleep apnea syndrome were selected and randomly divided into an observation group (n=50, systematic comprehensive nursing) and a control group (n=50, routine nursing) according to a random number table method. The nursing effects, nursing satisfaction, negative emotions, quality of life, and sleep quality scores were compared between the two groups. Results The nursing effect and nursing satisfaction of the observation group were higher than those of the control group (P<0.05); The comparison of negative emotions after nursing showed that the observation group was lower than the control group (P<0.05); After nursing, the quality of life in the observation group was higher than that in the control group (P<0.05); After nursing, the sleep quality score of the observation group was lower than that of the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion For patients with sleep apnea syndrome, implementing systematic comprehensive nursing can improve nursing effectiveness, nursing satisfaction, and quality of life, as well as improve negative emotions and sleep quality.

Sleep apnea syndrome; Routine care; Systemic and integrated care