Multi-Environment Evaluation of Bread Wheat Genotypes for Yield Stability in Ethiopia Using AMMI and GGE-Biplot Analyses-Crop Breeding, Genetics and Genomics-CSCIED科技核心评价数据库-手机版

Multi-Environment Evaluation of Bread Wheat Genotypes for Yield Stability in Ethiopia Using AMMI and GGE-Biplot Analyses

Multi-Environment Evaluation of Bread Wheat Genotypes for Yield Stability in Ethiopia Using AMMI and GGE-Biplot Analyses

ES评分 0 浏览量：234 下载量：0

全文阅读下载引用收藏

DOI	10.20900/cbgg20250004
刊名	Crop Breeding, Genetics and Genomics CBGG
年，卷(期)	2025, 7(2)
作者	Molla Mekonnen Kassie*,Tiegist Dejene Abebe,Ermias Abate Desta,Wuletaw Tadesse,
作者单位	Department of Plant Sciences, College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar P.O. Box 79, Ethiopia ; Sasakawa Africa Association (SAA), Addis Ababa P.O. Box 24135, Ethiopia ; International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), Rabat P.O. Box 6299, Morocco ;
摘要	Ensuring the resilience and productivity of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) across diverse environments is essential for sustainable food production, particularly in the context of climate change. However, genotype-by-environment interaction (GEI) significantly influences the selection of high-yielding and stable wheat genotypes across diverse environments. This study evaluated 250 bread wheat genotypes, including 240 elite lines from the International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA) and 10 released varieties in Ethiopia, across five environments during the 2022–2023 cropping season. The trials were conducted using an alpha lattice design with two replications, and agronomic traits, including grain yield, were analyzed using the Additive Main Effects and Multiplicative Interaction (AMMI) and Genotype + Genotype-by-Environment (GGE) biplot models. The analysis of variance revealed significant effects of genotype, environment, and their interaction on all measured traits. Environmental factors contributed the largest portion of the total variance, particularly for grain yield and plant height. The study identified G-180 and G-242 as the most stable genotypes across environments, demonstrating consistent performance and low genotype × environment interaction in both AMMI and GGE analyses. G-232 and G-234 were more specific to certain environments and might perform optimally in those settings but are less stable across diverse environments. Additionally, the study highlighted the importance of selecting genotypes based on mean yield and stability for breeding programs. The findings provide valuable insights into breeding strategies for wheat improvement, emphasizing the need for multi-environment trials in selecting resilient and high-yielding genotypes suitable for diverse agroecological zones.
Abstract	Ensuring the resilience and productivity of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) across diverse environments is essential for sustainable food production, particularly in the context of climate change. However, genotype-by-environment interaction (GEI) significantly influences the selection of high-yielding and stable wheat genotypes across diverse environments. This study evaluated 250 bread wheat genotypes, including 240 elite lines from the International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA) and 10 released varieties in Ethiopia, across five environments during the 2022–2023 cropping season. The trials were conducted using an alpha lattice design with two replications, and agronomic traits, including grain yield, were analyzed using the Additive Main Effects and Multiplicative Interaction (AMMI) and Genotype + Genotype-by-Environment (GGE) biplot models. The analysis of variance revealed significant effects of genotype, environment, and their interaction on all measured traits. Environmental factors contributed the largest portion of the total variance, particularly for grain yield and plant height. The study identified G-180 and G-242 as the most stable genotypes across environments, demonstrating consistent performance and low genotype × environment interaction in both AMMI and GGE analyses. G-232 and G-234 were more specific to certain environments and might perform optimally in those settings but are less stable across diverse environments. Additionally, the study highlighted the importance of selecting genotypes based on mean yield and stability for breeding programs. The findings provide valuable insights into breeding strategies for wheat improvement, emphasizing the need for multi-environment trials in selecting resilient and high-yielding genotypes suitable for diverse agroecological zones.
关键词	genotype-by-environment interaction; AMMI; GGE-biplot; grain yield stability; multi-environment trials
KeyWord	genotype-by-environment interaction; AMMI; GGE-biplot; grain yield stability; multi-environment trials
基金项目
页码	-

参考文献
相关文献

1.Arzani A, Ashraf M. Cultivated Ancient Wheats (Triticum spp.): A Potential Source of Health-Beneficial Food Products. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2017;16(3):477–88.

2.Tadesse W, Zegeye H, Debele T, Kassa D, Shiferaw W, Solomon T, et al. Wheat Production and Breeding in Ethiopia: Retrospect and Prospects. Crop Breeding, Genet Genomics. 2022;4(3):1–22.

3.Effa K, Fana DM, Nigussie M, Geleti D, Abebe N, Dechassa N, et al. The irrigated wheat initiative of Ethiopia: a new paradigm emulating Asia’s green revolution in Africa. Environ Dev Sustain. 2023;1–26.

4.Senbeta AF, Worku W. Ethiopia’s wheat production pathways to self-sufficiency through land area expansion, irrigation advance, and yield gap closure. Heliyon. 2023;9(10):1–13.

5.Mishra CN, Tiwari V, Satish-Kumar, Gupta V, Kumar A, Sharma I. Genetic diversity and genotype by trait analysis for agromorphological and physiological traits of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Sabrao J Breed Genet. 2015;47(1):40–8.

6.Mulugeta B, Tesfaye K, Geleta M, Johansson E, Hailesilassie T, Hammenhag C, et al. Multivariate analyses of Ethiopian durum wheat revealed stable and high yielding genotypes. PLoS One. 2022;17(8):1–21.

7.Debele T, Kifle T, Geleta T, Gemechu B, Kaske K, Homma S. NATIONAL WHEAT SEED ROADMAP FOR ETHIOPIA. Addis Ababa (Ethiopia): Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research; 2024. p. 1–138.

8.Tadesse W, Sanchez-Garcia M, Tawkaz S, El-Hanafi S, Skaf P, El-Baouchi A, et al. Wheat breeding handbook at ICARDA. Beirut, Lebanon. 2019. Available from: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/10723. Accessed on 01 May 2025.

9.T. Olivoto and A. D. C. Lúcio, “metan: An R package for multi-environment trial analysis,” Methods Ecol. Evol. 2020;11(6). doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.13384

10.Zobel RW, Wright MJ, Gauch HG. Statistical Analysis of a Yield Trial. Agron J. 1988;80(3):388–93.

11.Purchase JL, Hatting H, van Deventer CS. Genotype × environment interaction of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in South Africa: II. Stability analysis of yield performance. South African J Plant Soil. 2000;17(3):101–7.

12.Adjebeng-Danquah J, Manu-Aduening J, Gracen VE, Asante IK, Offei SK. AMMI Stability Analysis and Estimation of Genetic Parameters for Growth and Yield Components in Cassava in the Forest and Guinea Savannah Ecologies of Ghana. Int J Agron. 2017;2017:1–10.

13.Mahmodi N, Yaghotipoor A, Farshadfar E. AMMI stability value and simultaneous estimation of yield and yield stability in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Aust J Crop Sci. 2011;5(13):1837–44.

14.Ortiz R, Sayre KD, Govaerts B, Gupta R, Subbarao GV, Ban T, et al. Climate change: can wheat beat the heat? Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2008;126(1–2):46–58.

15.Semenov MA, Stratonovitch P, Alghabari F, Gooding MJ. Adapting wheat in Europe for climate change. J Cereal Sci. 2014;59:245–56.

16.Ansarifar J, Akhavizadegan F, Wang L. Performance prediction of crosses in plant breeding through genotype by environment interactions. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1533):1–11.

17.Malik WA, Forkman J, Piepho HP. Testing multiplicative terms in AMMI and GGE models for multienvironment trials with replicates. Theor Appl Genet. 2019;132(7):2087–96.

18.Sharma S, Schulthess AW, Bassi FM, Badaeva ED, Neumann K, Graner A, et al. Introducing beneficial alleles from plant genetic resources into the wheat germplasm. Biology. 2021;10:1–36.

19.Rashad MMI, Sarker U. Genetic variations in yield and yield contributing traits of green amaranth. Genetika. 2020;52(1):393–407.

20.Mullualem D, Tsega A, Mengie T, Fentie D, Kassa Z, Fassil A, et al. Genotype-by-environment interaction and stability analysis of grain yield of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes using AMMI and GGE biplot analyses. Heliyon. 2024;10(12:e32918):1–16.

21.Alemu D, Firew M, Tadesse D. Genetic variability studies on bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes. J Plant Breed Crop Sci. 2019;11(2):41–54.

22.Yan W, Kang MS. GGE biplot analysis: A graphical tool for breeders, geneticists, and agronomists. 1st Editio. Boca Raton; 2002. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420040371. Accessed on 01 May 2025.

23.Mehari M, Tesfay M, Yirga H, Mesele A, Abebe T, Workineh A, et al. GGE biplot analysis of genotype-by-environment interaction and grain yield stability of bread wheat genotypes in South Tigray, Ethiopia. Commun Biometry Crop Sci. 2015;10(1):17–26.

24.Mohamed M. Genotype by environment interactions for grain yield in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J Plant Breed Crop Sci. 2013;7(5):150–7.

25.Johansson E, Branlard G, Cuniberti M, Flagella Z, Hüsken A, Nurit E, et al. Genotypic and environmental effects on wheat technological and nutritional quality. In: Igrejas G, Ikeda T, Guzmán C, editors. Wheat Quality For Improving Processing And Human H. Cham (Switzerland): Springer; 2020. p. 171–204.

26.Elias AA, Robbins KR, Doerge RW, Tuinstra MR. Half a century of studying genotype × Environment interactions in plant breeding experiments. Crop Sci. 2016;56(5):2090–105.

27.Yan W, Rajcan I. Biplot analysis of test sites and trait relations of soybean in Ontario. Crop Sci. 2002;42(1):11–20.

28.Yan W, Hunt LA, Sheng Q, Szlavnics Z. Cultivar evaluation and mega‐environment investigation based on the GGE biplot. Crop Sci. 2000;40(3):597–605.

29.Liliane TN, Charles MS. Factors Affecting Yield of Crops, Agronomy - Climate Change & Food Security. London (UK): IntechOpen; 2020. p. 1–16.

30.Yan W, Tinker NA. Biplot analysis of multi-environment trial data: Principles and applications. Can J Plant Sci. 2006;86(3):623–45.

31.Aruna C, Rakshit S, Shrotria PK, Pahuja SK, Jain SK, Siva Kumar S, et al. Assessing genotype-by-environment interactions and trait associations in forage sorghum using GGE biplot analysis. J Agric Sci. 2016;154(1):1–14

引用本文

Molla Mekonnen Kassie*,Tiegist Dejene Abebe,Ermias Abate Desta,Wuletaw Tadesse. Multi-Environment Evaluation of Bread Wheat Genotypes for Yield Stability in Ethiopia Using AMMI and GGE-Biplot Analyses [J]. Crop Breeding, Genetics and Genomics. 2025; 7; (2). - .

文献评论

相关学者

相关机构