Advances in Sustainable Soil Health Restoration through Chemical Biological Physical Integrated and Nano Remediation Techniques-Journal of Sustainability Research-CSCIED科技核心评价数据库-手机版

Advances in Sustainable Soil Health Restoration through Chemical Biological Physical Integrated and Nano Remediation Techniques

Advances in Sustainable Soil Health Restoration through Chemical Biological Physical Integrated and Nano Remediation Techniques

ES评分 0 浏览量：307 下载量：0

全文阅读下载引用收藏

DOI	10.20900/jsr20250056
刊名	Journal of Sustainability Research JSR
年，卷(期)	2025, 7(3)
作者	Kiran Keshyagol,U. Satisha Prabhu,Pavan Hiremath*,B. M. Gurumurthy,Y. M. Shivaprakash,G. Divya Deepak,Suhas Kowshik,
作者单位	Department of Mechatronics, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal 576104, India ; Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal 576104, India ;
摘要	Land degradation, caused by pollution, salinization, erosion, and nutrient loss, undermines food security, the resilience of climate systems, and the health of ecosystems. This review provides an assessment of distinct advanced techniques used for soil remediation which include chemical, biological, physical, integrated, and nano remediation. Some chemical methods like gypsum reclamation, electrokinetic remediation, and advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) focus on the mobilization and breakdown of contaminants, achieving high removal efficiencies epitomized by heavy metals and organics. Other methods, such as phytoremediation, bioaugmentation, and mycoremediation, enhance soil fertility and employ restorational biology while inventive methods like Microbially-Induced Calcite Precipitation (MICP) bolster soil strength. Some of the physical processes are soil flushing and thermal desorption which can efficiently remove pollutants, but energy costs are high. Integrated techniques, notably the application of biochar and electro-bioremediation, demonstrate synergistic enhancement with soil structure and bioremediation performance. Nano-remediation provides unparalleled efficiency for pollutant removal but using nano-zero valent iron (nZVI), nanoclays, and graphene oxide (GO) poses unchartered ecological threats. From the comparison, it is clear that the sustainable remedial approach requires a multifaceted hybrid methodology tailored to the specific site conditions.
Abstract	Land degradation, caused by pollution, salinization, erosion, and nutrient loss, undermines food security, the resilience of climate systems, and the health of ecosystems. This review provides an assessment of distinct advanced techniques used for soil remediation which include chemical, biological, physical, integrated, and nano remediation. Some chemical methods like gypsum reclamation, electrokinetic remediation, and advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) focus on the mobilization and breakdown of contaminants, achieving high removal efficiencies epitomized by heavy metals and organics. Other methods, such as phytoremediation, bioaugmentation, and mycoremediation, enhance soil fertility and employ restorational biology while inventive methods like Microbially-Induced Calcite Precipitation (MICP) bolster soil strength. Some of the physical processes are soil flushing and thermal desorption which can efficiently remove pollutants, but energy costs are high. Integrated techniques, notably the application of biochar and electro-bioremediation, demonstrate synergistic enhancement with soil structure and bioremediation performance. Nano-remediation provides unparalleled efficiency for pollutant removal but using nano-zero valent iron (nZVI), nanoclays, and graphene oxide (GO) poses unchartered ecological threats. From the comparison, it is clear that the sustainable remedial approach requires a multifaceted hybrid methodology tailored to the specific site conditions.
关键词	soil; soil health; sustainability; soil remediation; soil organic carbon (SOC)
KeyWord	soil; soil health; sustainability; soil remediation; soil organic carbon (SOC)
基金项目
页码	-

参考文献
相关文献

1.Smith P, Cotrufo MF, Rumpel C, Paustian K, Kuikman PJ, Elliott JA, et al. Biogeochemical cycles and biodiversity as key drivers of ecosystem services provided by soils. Soil. 2015;1(2):665-85. doi: 10.5194/soil-1-665-2015.
2.Yudina A, Kuzyakov Y. Dual nature of soil structure: The unity of aggregates and pores. Geoderma. 2023;434:116478. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2023.116478.
3.Omo-Okoro P, Ofori P, Amalapridman V, Dadrasnia A, Abbey L, Emenike C. Soil pollution and its interrelation with interfacial chemistry. Molecules. 2025;30(12):2636. doi: 10.3390/molecules30122636.
4.Alemu EB. Evaluating the environmental impacts of industrialization and urbanization on groundwater quality: A comprehensive review of methodological approaches in Ethiopia. Green Energy Environ Tech. 2025. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.5285703.
5.Khalid S, Shahid M, Niazi NK, Murtaza B, Bibi I, Dumat C. A comparison of technologies for remediation of heavy metal contaminated soils. J Geochem Explor. 2017;182:247-68. doi: 10.1016/j.gexplo.2016.11.021.
6.European Environment Agency. Progress in the Management of Contaminated Sites (Indicator). Copenhagen (Denmark): European Environment Agency; 2022.
7.Ahmad N, Pandey P. Spatio-temporal distribution, ecological risk assessment, and multivariate analysis of heavy metals in Bathinda District, Punjab, India. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2020;231(8):431. doi: 10.1007/s11270-020-04767-9.
8.Cao B, Sun Z, Bai D, Kong L, Zhang X, Chen J, et al. The identification of soil heavy metal sources and environmental risks in industrial city peri-urban areas: A case study from a typical peri-urban area in western Laizhou, Shandong, China. Sustainability. 2024;16(11):4655. doi: 10.3390/su16114655.
9.Gong Y, Zhao D, Wang Q. An overview of field-scale studies on remediation of soil contaminated with heavy metals and metalloids: Technical progress over the last decade. Water Res. 2018;147:440-60. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.10.024.
10.Hou D, Jia X, Wang L, McGrath SP, Zhu YG, Hu Q, et al. Global soil pollution by toxic metals threatens agriculture and human health. Science. 2025;388(6744):316-21. doi: 10.1126/science.adr5214.
11.Boularbah A, Aloo BN, Benidire L, Neina D, Lahlali R. Soil health and contamination: Processes, remediation, and impacts on food security. In: Innovative Approaches in Environmental Health Management: Processes, Technologies, and Strategies for a Sustainable Future. Cham (Switzerland): Springer; 2025; p. 87-111. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-81966-7_4.
12.Zhang L, Wang Y, Ding Q, Shi Y. Current status and prospects of ecological restoration and brownfield reuse research based on bibliometric analysis: A literature review. Land (Basel). 2025;14(6):1185. doi: 10.3390/land14061185.
13.Sobieraj, Metelski D. Analysis of technologies for the reclamation of illegal landfills: A case study of the relocation and management of chromium and arsenic contamination in Łomianki (Poland). Sustainability. 2025;17(7):2796. doi: 10.3390/su17072796.
14.Abou-Shady A, El-Araby H. Soil electrokinetic remediation to restore mercury-polluted soils: A critical review. Chemosphere. 2025;377:144336. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2025.144336.
15.Zeng W, Yao B, Zhou Y, Yang J, Zhi D. Combination of electrochemical advanced oxidation and biotreatment for wastewater treatment and soil remediation. J Environ Sci. 2025;150:36-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2024.02.036.
16.Saqr AM, Pant RR, Alao JO, Chaurasia PK, Abdelkebir B, Abd-Elmaboud ME. Soil remediation through washing and flushing: bibliometric trends, technical review, and future prospects. Environ Earth Sci. 2025;84(14):401. doi: 10.1007/s12665-025-12386-y.
17.Zhao H, Cui W, Yang Y, Li S, Song F, Wang M, et al. Surfactant-functionalized fly ash from waste into wealth: Collaboratively scavenge of heavy metals and antibiotics from multi-pollutant wastewater. Sep Purif Technol. 2025;375:133862. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2025.133862.
18.Ma Y, He C, Yang L, Liu X, Wang F. Effective remediation of benzo
[a] anthracene contaminated soil by combination of low-temperature thermal desorption and advanced oxidation. Chem Eng J. 2025;511:162166. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2025.162166.
19.Kumar K, Shinde A, Aeron V, Verma A, Arif NS. Genetic engineering of plants for phytoremediation: Advances and challenges. J Plant Biochem Biotechnol. 2023;32(1):12-30. doi: 10.1007/s13562-022-00776-3.
20.Wojtowicz K, Steliga T, Kapusta P. Evaluation of the effectiveness of bioaugmentation-assisted phytoremediation of soils contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbons using Echinacea purpurea. Appl Sci. 2023;13(24):13077. doi: 10.3390/app132413077.
21.Akpasi SO, Anekwe IM, Tetteh EK, Amune UO, Shoyiga HO, Mahlangu TP, et al. Mycoremediation as a potentially promising technology: Current status and prospects—A review. Appl Sci. 2023;13(8):4978. doi: 10.3390/app13084978.
22.Tian H, Liang Y, Yang D, Sun Y. Characteristics of PVP–stabilised NZVI and application to dechlorination of soil–sorbed TCE with ionic surfactant. Chemosphere. 2020;239:124807. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124807.
23.López-Rodríguez D, Micó-Vicent B, Jordán-Núñez J, Bonet-Aracil M, Bou-Belda E. Uses of nanoclays and adsorbents for dye recovery: A textile industry review. Appl Sci. 2021;11(23):11422. doi: 10.3390/app112311422.
24.Uprety DC, Reddy VR, Mura JD. Climate Change and Agriculture. Singapore: Springer; 2019. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-2014-9.
25.Temple PH, Rapp A. Landslides in the Mgeta area, Western Uluguru Mountains, Tanzania. Geografiska Annaler: Series A, Physical Geography. 1972;54(3–4):157-93. doi: 10.1080/04353676.1972.11879864.
26.Yoro KO, Daramola MO. CO2 emission sources, greenhouse gases, and the global warming effect. In: Advances in Carbon Capture. Amsterdam, (Netherlands): Elsevier; 2020. p. 3-28. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-819657-1.00001-3.
27.Lal R. Soil erosion and the global carbon budget. Environ Int. 2003;29(4):437-50. doi: 10.1016/S0160-4120(02)00192-7.
28.Hussain S, Ulhassan Z, Brestic M, Zivcak M, Zhou W, Allakhverdiev SI, et al. Photosynthesis research under climate change. Photosynth Res. 2021;150(1–3):5-19. doi: 10.1007/s11120-021-00861-z.
29.Smith P, Calvin K, Nkem J, Campbell D, Cherubini F, Grassi G, et al. Which practices co‐deliver food security, climate change mitigation and adaptation, and combat land degradation and desertification? Glob Chang Biol. 2020;26(3):1532-75. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14878.
30.Karavolias NG, Horner W, Abugu MN, Evanega SN. Application of gene editing for climate change in agriculture. Front Sustain Food Syst. 2021;5:685801. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2021.685801.
31.Bibi F, Rahman A. An overview of climate change impacts on agriculture and their mitigation strategies. Agriculture. 2023;13(8):1508. doi: 10.3390/agriculture13081508.
32.Kopittke PM, Berhe AA, Carrillo Y, Cavagnaro TR, Chen D, Chen QL, et al. Ensuring planetary survival: The centrality of organic carbon in balancing the multifunctional nature of soils. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol. 2022;52(23):4308-24. doi: 10.1080/10643389.2021.2024484.
33.Keesstra S, Sannigrahi S, López-Vicente M, Pulido M, Novara A, Visser S, et al. The role of soils in regulation and provision of blue and green water. Philos Trans R Soc B: Biol Sci. 2021;376(1834):20200175. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0175.
34.Lal R, Monger C, Nave L, Smith P. The role of soil in regulation of climate. Philos Trans R Soc B: Biol Sci. 2021;376(1834):20210084. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0084.
35.Valentine J, Clifton‐Brown J, Hastings A, Robson P, Allison G, Smith P. Food vs. fuel: the use of land for lignocellulosic ‘next generation’ energy crops that minimize competition with primary food production. GCB Bioenergy. 2012;4(1):1-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01111.x.
36.Sommer R, Bossio D. Dynamics and climate change mitigation potential of soil organic carbon sequestration. J Environ Manage. 2014;144:83-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.05.017.
37.Prasad S, Malav LC, Choudhary J, Kannojiya S, Kundu M, Kumar S, et al. Soil microbiomes for healthy nutrient recycling. In: Current Trends in Microbial Biotechnology for Sustainable Agriculture. Singapore: Springer; 2020; p. 1-21. doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-6949-4_1.
38.Iyiola AO, Babafemi OP, Ogundahunsi OE, Ojeleye AE. Food security: A pathway towards improved nutrition and biodiversity conservation. In: Biodiversity in Africa: Potentials, Threats and Conservation. Singapore: Springer Nature; 2022; p. 79-107. doi: 10.1007/978-981-19-3326-4_4.
39.Pawlak K, Kołodziejczak M. The role of agriculture in ensuring food security in developing countries: Considerations in the context of the problem of sustainable food production. Sustainability. 2020;12(13):5488. doi: 10.3390/su12135488.
40.Eugenio NR, Nachtergaele F, Biancalani R, Emiliano M, Benedetti F, Li L. Working together for soils: The longstanding collaboration between FAO and the IUSS. In: Soil science in Italy. Cham (Switzerland): Springer International Publishing; 2024. p. 649-53. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-52744-9_35.
41.Adamsone-Fiskovica A, Grivins M. Understanding the potential of sustainability turn in farming: Review of sociotechnical adoption factors of agri-environmental cropping practices. Renew Agric Food Syst. 2024;39:e16. doi: 10.1017/S1742170524000085.
42.Lal R. Soil organic matter and water retention. Agron J. 2020;112(5):3265-77. doi: 10.1002/agj2.20282.
43.Bi X, Chu H, Fu M, Xu D, Zhao W, Zhong Y, et al. Distribution characteristics of organic carbon (nitrogen) content, cation exchange capacity, and specific surface area in different soil particle sizes. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):12242. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-38646-0.
44.Condron L, Stark C, O’Callaghan M, Clinton P, Huang Z. The role of microbial communities in the formation and decomposition of soil organic matter. In: Soil microbiology and sustainable crop production. Dordrecht (Netherlands): Springer; 2010. p. 81-118. doi: 10.1007/978-90-481-9479-7_4.
45.Mukhopadhyay R, Sarkar B, Jat HS, Sharma PC, Bolan NS. Soil salinity under climate change: Challenges for sustainable agriculture and food security. J Environ Manage. 2021;280:111736. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111736.
46.Lampridi M, Sørensen C, Bochtis D. Agricultural sustainability: A review of concepts and methods. Sustainability. 2019;11(18):5120. doi: 10.3390/su11185120.
47.Gangwar P, Singh R, Trivedi M, Tiwari RK. Sodic soil: Management and reclamation strategies. In: Environmental concerns and sustainable development. Singapore: Springer; 2020. p. 175-90. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-6358-0_8.
48.Abdolvand Y, Sadeghiamirshahidi M. Soil stabilization with gypsum: A review. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng. 2024;16(12):5278-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jrmge.2024.02.007.
49.Shruthi, Prakash NB, Dhumgond P, Goiba PK, Laxmanarayanan M. The benefits of gypsum for sustainable management and utilization of acid soils. Plant Soil. 2024;504(1–2):5-28. doi: 10.1007/s11104-024-06907-0.
50.Singh YP, Arora S, Mishra VK, Bhardwaj AK. Regaining the agricultural potential of sodic soils and improved smallholder food security through integration of gypsum, pressmud and salt tolerant varieties. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems. 2022;46(3):410-31. doi: 10.1080/21683565.2021.2015735.
51.Wakeel A, Ishfaq M. Potash Use and Dynamics in Agriculture. Berlin Heidelberg (Germany): Springer; 2021. doi: 10.1007/978-981-16-6883-8.
52.Zhang W, Zhang W, Wang S, Sun Z, Liu J, Li Y, et al. A quantitative assessment of the dynamic process and potential capacity of using gypsum to reclaim sodic soil. J Soils Sediments. 2023;23(8):3082-95. doi: 10.1007/s11368-023-03535-6.
53.Akansha J, Thakur S, Chaithanya MS, Gupta BS, Das S, Das B, et al. Technological and economic analysis of electrokinetic remediation of contaminated soil: A global perspective and its application in Indian scenario. Heliyon. 2024;10(2):e24293. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24293.
54.El-Mehalmey WA, Alkordi MH. Electrokinetic remediation technique for soil contaminants. In: Nanoremediation. Amsterdam (Netherlands): Elsevier; 2023. p. 229-58. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-823874-5.00005-X.
55.Abou-Shady A, Yu W. Recent advances in electrokinetic methods for soil remediation. A critical review of selected data for the period 2021–2022. Int J Electrochem Sci. 2023;18(8):100234. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoes.2023.100234.
56.Panizza M, Cerisola G. Direct and mediated anodic oxidation of organic pollutants. Chem Rev. 2009;109(12):6541-69. doi: 10.1021/cr9001319.
57.Tang K, Bo Z, Li Z, Da Wang Y, McClure J, Su H, et al. Controlled ion transport in the subsurface: A coupled advection–diffusion–electromigration system. Phys Fluids. 2024;36(6):067137. doi: 10.1063/5.0213161.
58.Mao X, Jiang R, Xiao W, Yu J. Use of surfactants for the remediation of contaminated soils: A review. J Hazard Mater. 2015;285:419-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.12.009.
59.Rasheed T, Shafi S, Bilal M, Hussain T, Sher F, Rizwan K. Surfactants-based remediation as an effective approach for removal of environmental pollutants—A review. J Mol Liq. 2020;318:113960. doi: 10.1016/j.molliq.2020.113960.
60.Bolan S, Padhye LP, Mulligan CN, Alonso ER, Saint-Fort R, Jasemizad T, et al. Surfactant-enhanced mobilization of persistent organic pollutants: Potential for soil and sediment remediation and unintended consequences. J Hazard Mater. 2023;443:130189. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.130189.
61.Wołowicz A, Staszak K, Hubicki Z. Effect of anionic surfactants on the heavy metal ions removal by adsorption onto ion exchangers—batch and column studies. J Water Process Eng. 2023;53:103792. doi: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.103792.
62.Cheng M, Zeng G, Huang D, Yang C, Lai C, Zhang C, et al. Advantages and challenges of Tween 80 surfactant-enhanced technologies for the remediation of soils contaminated with hydrophobic organic compounds. Chem Eng J. 2017;314:98-113. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2016.12.135.
63.Koundal M, Singh AK, Sharma C. Study on the effect of imidazolium ionic liquid as a modulator of corrosion inhibition of anionic surfactant sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) on mild steel in sodium chloride solution. J Mol Liq. 2022;350:118561. doi: 10.1016/j.molliq.2022.118561.
64.Zhao Y, Sun Y, Sun H, Zuo F, Kuang S, Zhang S, et al. Surfactant-based chemical washing to remediate oil-contaminated soil: The state of knowledge. Toxics. 2024;12(9):648. doi: 10.3390/toxics12090648.
65.Mukherjee J, Lodh BK, Sharma R, Mahata N, Shah MP, Mandal S, et al. Advanced oxidation process for the treatment of industrial wastewater: A review on strategies, mechanisms, bottlenecks and prospects. Chemosphere. 2023;345:140473. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.140473.
66.Ndibewu PP, Mramba AS, Makgopa K, Sibali LL. Nanoelectrocatalysts-Enhanced methods for removal of volatile organic compounds in wastewater. In: Nanoelectrocatalysts for Energy and Water Treatment. Cham (Switzerland): Springer Nature; 2024. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-55329-5_13.
67.Ayoub K, van Hullebusch ED, Cassir M, Bermond A. Application of advanced oxidation processes for TNT removal: A review. J Hazard Mater. 2010;178(1–3):10-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.02.042.
68.Dai M, Niu Q, Wu S, Lin Y, Biswas JK, Yang C. Hydroxyl radicals in ozone-based advanced oxidation of organic contaminants: A review. Environ Chem Lett. 2024;22(6):3059-106. doi: 10.1007/s10311-024-01772-w.
69.Tijani JO, Fatoba OO, Madzivire G, Petrik LF. A review of combined advanced oxidation technologies for the removal of organic pollutants from water. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2014;225(9):2102. doi: 10.1007/s11270-014-2102-y.
70.Mahbub P, Duke M. Scalability of advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) in industrial applications: A review. J Environ Manage. 2023;345:118861. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118861.
71.Pandis PK, Kalogirou C, Kanellou E, Vaitsis C, Savvidou MG, Sourkouni G, et al. Key points of advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) for wastewater, organic pollutants and pharmaceutical waste treatment: A mini review. ChemEngineering. 2022;6(1):8. doi: 10.3390/chemengineering6010008.
72.Magalhães VM, Aranha RM, Mendes GP, Soares LC, Yoshikawa NK, Nascimento CA, et al. Homogeneous and heterogeneous advanced oxidation processes: Treatability studies on artificially contaminated soils with creosote. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2022;233(1):29. doi: 10.1007/s11270-022-05498-9.
73.Calenciuc C, Fdez-Sanromán A, Lama G, Annamalai S, Sanromán A, Pazos M. Recent developments in advanced oxidation processes for organics-polluted soil reclamation. Catalysts. 2022;12(1):64. doi: 10.3390/catal12010064.
74.Bhat SA, Bashir O, Haq SA, Amin T, Rafiq A, Ali M, et al. Phytoremediation of heavy metals in soil and water: An eco-friendly, sustainable and multidisciplinary approach. Chemosphere. 2022;303:134788. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134788.
75.Evangelou MWH, Papazoglou EG, Robinson BH, Schulin R. Phytomanagement: Phytoremediation and the production of biomass for economic revenue on contaminated land. In: Phytoremediation. Cham (Switzerland): Springer International Publishing; 2015. p. 115-32. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-10395-2_9.
76.Nemati B, Baneshi MM, Akbari H, Dehghani R, Mostafaii G. Phytoremediation of pollutants in oil-contaminated soils by Alhagi camelorum: Evaluation and modeling. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):5502. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-56214-y.
77.Bolan NS, Park JH, Robinson B, Naidu R, Huh KY. Phytostabilization: A green approach to contaminant containment. Adv Agron. 2011;112:145-204. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-385538-1.00004-4.
78.Barwise Y, Kumar P. Designing vegetation barriers for urban air pollution abatement: A practical review for appropriate plant species selection. NPJ Clim Atmos Sci. 2020;3(1):12. doi: 10.1038/s41612-020-0115-3.
79.Eapen S, D’Souza SF. Prospects of genetic engineering of plants for phytoremediation of toxic metals. Biotechnol Adv. 2005;23(2):97-114. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2004.10.001.
80.Dushenkov S, Mikheev A, Prokhnevsky A, Ruchko M, Sorochinsky B. Phytoremediation of radiocesium-contaminated soil in the vicinity of Chernobyl, Ukraine. Environ Sci Technol. 1999;33(3):469-75. doi: 10.1021/es980788.
81.Jiang L, Xia H, Wang W, Zhang Y, Li Z. Applications of microbially induced calcium carbonate precipitation in civil engineering practice: A state-of-the-art review. Constr Build Mater. 2023;404:133227. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.133227.
82.Wong PY, Mal J, Sandak A, Luo L, Jian J, Pradhan N. Advances in microbial self-healing concrete: A critical review of mechanisms, developments, and future directions. Sci Total Environ. 2024;947:174553. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.174553.
83.Konstantinou C, Wang Y. Unlocking the potential of microbially induced calcium carbonate precipitation (MICP) for hydrological applications: A review of opportunities, challenges, and environmental considerations. Hydrology. 2023;10(9):178. doi: 10.3390/hydrology10090178.
84.Mujah D, Shahin MA, Cheng L. State-of-the-art review of biocementation by microbially induced calcite precipitation (MICP) for soil stabilization. Geomicrobiol J. 2017;34(6):524-37. doi: 10.1080/01490451.2016.1225866.
85.Wang Y-N, Li S-K, Li Z-Y, Garg A. Exploring the application of the MICP technique for the suppression of erosion in granite residual soil in Shantou using a rainfall erosion simulator. Acta Geotech. 2023;18(6):3273-85. doi: 10.1007/s11440-022-01791-3.
86.Omoregie AI, Palombo EA, Nissom PM. Bioprecipitation of calcium carbonate mediated by ureolysis: A review. Environ Eng Res. 2020;26(6):200379. doi: 10.4491/eer.2020.379.
87.Cycoń M, Mrozik A, Piotrowska-Seget Z. Bioaugmentation as a strategy for the remediation of pesticide-polluted soil: A review. Chemosphere. 2017;172:52-71. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.12.129.
88.Lebeau T. Bioaugmentation for in situ soil remediation: How to ensure the success of such a process. In: Bioaugmentation, Biostimulation and Biocontrol. Berlin, Heidelberg (Germany): Springer; 2011; p. 129-86. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-19769-7_7.
89.Tyagi M, da Fonseca MMR, de Carvalho CCCR. Bioaugmentation and biostimulation strategies to improve the effectiveness of bioremediation processes. Biodegradation. 2011;22(2):231-41. doi: 10.1007/s10532-010-9394-4.
90.Megharaj M, Ramakrishnan B, Venkateswarlu K, Sethunathan N, Naidu R. Bioremediation approaches for organic pollutants: A critical perspective. Environ Int. 2011;37(8):1362-75. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2011.06.003.
91.Juwarkar AA, Singh SK, Mudhoo A. A comprehensive overview of elements in bioremediation. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol. 2010;9(3):215-88. doi: 10.1007/s11157-010-9215-6.
92.Kumar A, Yadav AN, Mondal R, Kour D, Subrahmanyam G, Shabnam AA, et al. Myco-remediation: A mechanistic understanding of contaminants alleviation from natural environment and future prospect. Chemosphere. 2021;284:131325. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131325.
93.Dinakarkumar Y, Ramakrishnan G, Gujjula KR, Vasu V, Balamurugan P, Murali G. Fungal bioremediation: An overview of the mechanisms, applications and future perspectives. Environ Chem Ecotoxicol. 2024;6:293-302. doi: 10.1016/j.enceco.2024.07.002.
94.Saravanan A, Kumar PS, Vo DVN, Jeevanantham S, Karishma S, Yaashikaa PR. A review on catalytic-enzyme degradation of toxic environmental pollutants: Microbial enzymes. J Hazard Mater. 2021;419:126451. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126451.
95.Gupta G, Maurya S, Jha PN, Chauhan PS. Valorization of spent mushroom substrate (SMS) as a sustainable approach to remediation of xenobiotic compounds in groundwater—A comprehensive review. Groundw Sustain Dev. 2024;26:101290. doi: 10.1016/j.gsd.2024.101290.
96.Noman E, Al-Gheethi A, Mohamed RMSR, Talip BA. Myco-remediation of xenobiotic organic compounds for a sustainable environment: A critical review. Top Curr Chem. 2019;377(3):17. doi: 10.1007/s41061-019-0241-8.
97.Navina BK, Velmurugan NK, Kumar PS, Rangasamy G, Palanivelu J, Thamarai P, et al. Fungal bioremediation approaches for the removal of toxic pollutants: Mechanistic understanding for biorefinery applications. Chemosphere. 2024;350:141123. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.141123.
98.Baghel P, Sakhiya AK, Kaushal P. Influence of temperature on slow pyrolysis of Prosopis Juliflora: An experimental and thermodynamic approach. Renew Energy. 2022;185:538-51. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2021.12.053.
99.Hassan A, Pariatamby A, Ossai IC, Hamid FS. Bioaugmentation assisted mycoremediation of heavy metal and/metalloid landfill contaminated soil using consortia of filamentous fungi. Biochem Eng J. 2020;157:107550. doi: 10.1016/j.bej.2020.107550.
100.He P, Guo J, Zhang S. Investigating the potential of microbially induced carbonate precipitation combined with modified biochar for remediation of lead-contaminated loess. Sustainability. 2024;16(17):7550. doi: 10.3390/su16177550.
101.Ghorbani Y, Franzidis JP, Petersen J. Heap leaching technology – current state, innovations and future directions: A review. Miner Process Extr Metall Rev. 2015. doi: 10.1080/08827508.2015.1115990.
102.Kwon JH, Ji MK, Kumar R, Islam MM, Khan MA, Park YK, et al. Recent advancement in enhanced soil flushing for remediation of petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated soil: A state-of-the-art review. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol. 2023;22(3):679-714. doi: 10.1007/s11157-023-09657-0.
103.Baldissarelli DP, Vargas GDLP, Korf EP, Galon L, Kaufmann C, Santos JB. Remediation of soils contaminated by pesticides using physicochemical processes: A brief review. Planta Daninha. 2019;37:e019184975. doi: 10.1590/s0100-83582019370100054.
104.Klik B, Gusiatin ZM, Kulikowska D. Quality of heavy metal-contaminated soil before and after column flushing with washing agents derived from municipal sewage sludge. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):15773. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-95441-5.
105.Guo X, Chen C, Wu QT, Wei Z. Field experiments to assess the remediation efficiency of metal-contaminated soil by flushing with ferric chloride followed by applying amendments. Sci Total Environ. 2023;868:161592. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161592.
106.Zhao C, Dong Y, Feng Y, Li Y, Dong Y. Thermal desorption for remediation of contaminated soil: A review. Chemosphere. 2019;221:841-55. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.01.079.
107.Liu H, Ma S, Zhang X, Yu Y. Application of thermal desorption methods for airborne polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon measurement: A critical review. Environ Pollut. 2019;254:113018. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113018.
108.Zhu L, Shen D, Luo KH. A critical review on VOCs adsorption by different porous materials: Species, mechanisms and modification methods. J Hazard Mater. 2020;389:122102. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122102.
109.Sörengård M, Lindh A-S, Ahrens L. Thermal desorption as a high removal remediation technique for soils contaminated with per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs). PLoS ONE. 2020;15(6):e0234476. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234476.
110.Risco C, López-Vizcaíno R, Sáez C, Yustres A, Cañizares P, Navarro V, et al. Remediation of soils polluted with 2,4-D by electrokinetic soil flushing with facing rows of electrodes: A case study in a pilot plant. Chem Eng J. 2016;285:128-36. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2015.10.011.
111.Biabani R, Ferrari P, Vaccari M. Best management practices for minimizing undesired effects of thermal remediation and soil washing on soil properties. A review. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2023;30(47):103480-95. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-29656-6.
112.Lee SH, Kim SO, Lee SW, Kim MS, Park H. Application of soil washing and thermal desorption for sustainable remediation and reuse of remediated soil. Sustainability. 2021;13(22):12523. doi: 10.3390/su132212523.
113.Wang B, Wu A, Li X, Ji L, Sun C, Shen Z, et al. Progress in fundamental research on thermal desorption remediation of organic compound-contaminated soil. Waste Dispos Sustain Energy. 2021;3(2):83-95. doi: 10.1007/s42768-021-00071-2.
114.Hameed R, Abbas A, Khan I, Balooch S, Iqbal B, Nazir MM, et al. Biochar-assisted remediation of contaminated soils under changing climate. In: Biochar-Assisted Remediation of Contaminated Soils under Changing Climate. Amsterdam (Netherlands): Elsevier; 2024. p. 377-420. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-443-21562-9.00015-3.
115.Chen ZS, Liu T, Dong JF, Chen G, Li Z, Zhou JL, et al. Sustainable application for agriculture using biochar-based slow-release fertilizers: A review. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2022;11(1):1-12. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c05691.
116.Kumar P, Singhania RR, Sumathi Y, Kurrey NK, Chen CW, Patel AK, et al. Investigating innovative techniques for biochar modification to enhance the removal of heavy metals from aqueous environments: A comprehensive review. Clean Technol Environ Policy. 2024:1-23. doi: 10.1007/s10098-024-02962-4.
117.Sakhiya AK, Anand A, Kaushal P. Production, activation, and applications of biochar in recent times. Biochar. 2020;2(3):253-85. doi: 10.1007/s42773-020-00047-1.
118.Atkinson CJ. How good is the evidence that soil‐applied biochar improves water‐holding capacity? Soil Use Manag. 2018;34(2):177-86. doi: 10.1111/sum.12413.
119.Gorovtsov AV, Minkina TM, Mandzhieva SS, Perelomov LV, Soja G, Zamulina IV, et al. The mechanisms of biochar interactions with microorganisms in soil. Environ Geochem Health. 2020;42(8):2495-518. doi: 10.1007/s10653-019-00412-5.
120.Fu Q, Zhao H, Li H, Li T, Hou R, Liu D, et al. Effects of biochar application during different periods on soil structures and water retention in seasonally frozen soil areas. Sci Total Environ. 2019;694:133732. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133732.
121.Beesley L, Moreno-Jiménez E, Gomez-Eyles JL, Harris E, Robinson B, Sizmur T. A review of biochars’ potential role in the remediation, revegetation and restoration of contaminated soils. Environ Pollut. 2011;159(12):3269-82. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2011.07.023.
122.Zama EF, Reid BJ, Arp HPH, Sun GX, Yuan HY, Zhu YG. Advances in research on the use of biochar in soil for remediation: A review. J Soils Sediments. 2018;18(7):2433-50. doi: 10.1007/s11368-018-2000-9.
123.Murtaza G, Ahmed Z, Eldin SM, Ali I, Usman M, Iqbal R, et al. Biochar as a green sorbent for remediation of polluted soils and associated toxicity risks: A critical review. Separations. 2023;10(3):197. doi: 10.3390/separations10030197.
124.Ge Q, Dong C, Wang G, Zhang J, Hou R. Production, characterization and environmental remediation application of emerging phosphorus-rich biochar/hydrochar: A comprehensive review. RSC Adv. 2024;14(45):33649-65. doi: 10.1039/D4RA03333G.
125.Chandra S, Medha I, Tiwari AK. The role of modified biochar for the remediation of coal mining-impacted contaminated soil: A review. Sustainability. 2023;15(5):3973. doi: 10.3390/su15053973.
126.El-Shafey SE, Obada MK, El-Shamy AM, Mohamed WS. Silica/klucel nanocomposite as promising durable adsorbent for lead removal from industrial effluents. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):26095. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-74680-2.
127.Nicomel NR, Otero-Gonzalez L, Williamson A, Ok YS, Van Der Voort P, Hennebel T, et al. Selective copper recovery from ammoniacal waste streams using a systematic biosorption process. Chemosphere. 2022;286:131935. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131935.
128.Hassan I, Mohamedelhassan E, Yanful EK, Yuan Z-C. A review article: Electrokinetic bioremediation current know

引用本文

Kiran Keshyagol,U. Satisha Prabhu,Pavan Hiremath*,B. M. Gurumurthy,Y. M. Shivaprakash,G. Divya Deepak,Suhas Kowshik. Advances in Sustainable Soil Health Restoration through Chemical Biological Physical Integrated and Nano Remediation Techniques [J]. Journal of Sustainability Research. 2025; 7; (3). - .

文献评论

相关学者

相关机构