程序化护理干预在颅脑肿瘤患者护理中的应用效果

The application effect of programmed nursing intervention in the nursing of patients with cranial tumors

ES评分 0

DOI 10.12208/j.ijnr.20240392
刊名
International Journal of Nursing Research
年,卷(期) 2024, 6(11)
作者
作者单位

河北中石油中心医院 河北廊坊 ;

摘要
探究程序化护理干预在颅脑肿瘤患者护理中的应用效果。以提高患者生活质量,降低术后压疮发生率。方法 选取2020年1月至2023年12月某医院收治的100例颅脑肿瘤手术治疗患者,遵循随机单盲分组原则将患者分为一般组和实验组,各50例。一般组在围手术期给予常规护理,实验组在围手术期给予程序化护理干预。比较两组患者的生活质量及术后压疮发生率等指标。结果 实验组患者的生活质量显著高于一般组,术后压疮发生率明显低于一般组,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 程序化护理干预在颅脑肿瘤患者护理中具有较高的应用价值,能够显著改善患者的生活质量,降低术后压疮发生率。
Abstract
Objective To explore the application effect of programmed nursing intervention in the nursing of patients with cranial tumors. To improve patients quality of life and reduce the incidence of postoperative pressure ulcers. Methods 100 patients undergoing surgical treatment for cranial tumors admitted to a hospital from January 2020 to December 2023 were selected. Following the principle of random single blind grouping, the patients were divided into a general group and an experimental group, with 50 patients in each group. The general group received routine care during the perioperative period, while the experimental group received procedural nursing interventions during the perioperative period. Compare the quality of life and incidence of postoperative pressure ulcers between two groups of patients. Results The quality of life of the experimental group patients was significantly higher than that of the general group, and the incidence of postoperative pressure ulcers was significantly lower than that of the general group, with statistical significance (P<0.05). Conclusion Programmed nursing intervention has high application value in the nursing of patients with cranial tumors, which can significantly improve their quality of life and reduce the incidence of postoperative pressure ulcers.
关键词
程序化护理干预;颅脑肿瘤;应用效果
KeyWord
Programmed nursing intervention; Brain tumor; Application effect
基金项目
页码 75-77
  • 参考文献
  • 相关文献
  • 引用本文

耿庆余*. 程序化护理干预在颅脑肿瘤患者护理中的应用效果 [J]. 国际护理学研究. 2024; 6; (11). 75 - 77.

  • 文献评论

相关学者

相关机构