International Journal of Nursing Research

Objective To explore the utility value of applying critical care scoring system and graded care in severe craniocerebral injury nursing. Methods A total of 118 cases of severe craniocerebral injury patients were selected for research and analysis in this experiment, and they were divided into two groups of control and observation by shaking the number, both of which were 59 patients, with the former adopting the graded care model and the latter implementing the critical care scoring system, and the actual application effects of the two groups were evaluated and compared. Results The study data showed that the average length of stay, direct care and hospitalization of the observation group was shorter than that of the control group (P＜0.05); at the same time, compared with the control group, the quality of care scores of the observation group were higher (P＜0.05); and the complication rate of the observation group was significantly lower than that of the control group (P＜0.05). Conclusion For patients with severe craniocerebral injury, the application of the critical care scoring system in nursing care can not only effectively improve the overall quality of nursing care, but also accelerate the recovery of patients, reduce the occurrence of complications, and provide a strong guarantee for the life and health of patients.

Critical care scoring system; Graded care; Severe craniocerebral injury; Application