探究循证护理在脊柱疾病护理中的应用效果
Explore the application effect of evidence-based nursing in spinal disease nursing
ES评分 0
| DOI |
10.12208/j.jacn.20240349 |
| 刊名 |
Journal of Advances in Clinical Nursing
|
| 年，卷(期) |
2024, 3(8) |
| 作者 |
|
| 作者单位 |
河池市宜州区中医医院 广西河池 ;
|
| 摘要 |
分析脊柱疾病护理用循证护理所起到的作用。方法 随机均分2022年6月-2024年5月本院接诊脊柱疾病病人（n=94）。试验组采取循证护理，对照组行常规护理。对比VAS评分等指标。结果 关于脊柱疾病认知度：试验组高达（92.03±3.16）分，对照组只有（69.47±6.51）分，分析后发现：试验组数据更高（P＜0.05）。VAS评分：干预后：试验组低至（3.05±0.84）分，对照组高达（4.93±0.97）分，分析后发现：试验组数据更低（P＜0.05）。满意度和护理效果：试验组95.74%、97.87%，对照组80.85%、82.98%，分析后发现：试验组数据更高（P＜0.05）。并发症：试验组4.26%，对照组17.02%，分析后发现：试验组数据更低（P＜0.05）。结论 脊柱疾病护理用循证护理，效果显著，病人的满意度也更高，并发症更少，疼痛感减轻更加显著。
|
| Abstract |
Objective To analyze the role of evidence-based nursing for spinal diseases. Methods From June 2022 to May 2024 (n=94). The experimental group adopts evidence-based care, and the control group does routine care. Comparast: VAS score. Results Regarding the awareness of spinal disease: up to (92.03 ± 3.16) in the test group and only (69.47±6.51) in the control group. After analysis, the data in the test group were higher (P <0.05). VAS score: After intervention: as low as (3.05±0.84) in the test group and as high as (4.93±0.97) in the control group. After analysis, the data in the test group were lower (P <0.05). Satisfaction and nursing effect: 95.74% and 97.87% in the test group, 80.85% and 82.98% in the control group. After analysis, the data in the test group were higher (P <0.05). Complications: 4.26% test group, 17.02% control group, after analysis: lower data in the test group (P<0.05). Conclusion Evidence-based care, higher patient satisfaction, fewer complications and more significant pain reduction.
|
| 关键词 |
循证护理；VAS评分；脊柱疾病；并发症
|
| KeyWord |
Evidence-based nursing; VAS score; Spinal disease; Complications
|
| 基金项目 |
|
| 页码 |
166-169 |
刘媚媚*.
探究循证护理在脊柱疾病护理中的应用效果 [J].
临床护理进展.
2024; 3; (8).
166 - 169.