鲁拉西酮治疗精神分裂症临床疗效评价

Evaluation of clinical efficacy of lurasidone in the treatment of schizophrenia

ES评分 0

DOI
刊名
Journal of International Psychiatry
年,卷(期) 2023, 50(4)
作者
作者单位

武汉市精神卫生中心 ;

摘要
目的:分析评价鲁拉西酮治疗精神分裂症的临床疗效及安全性。方法:将78例符合ICD—10精神分裂症诊断标准的患者随机分为鲁拉西酮组(n=38)和利培酮组(n=40),进行为期8周的研究。使用临床疗效总评量表(CGI- GI)和阳性和阴性症状量表(PANSS)分别在基线、2、4和8周末评估有效率和临床治疗效果。在基线和8周末评定主观舒适度量表(SWN)评价治疗依从性、评定席汉残疾量表(SDS)评价社会功能恢复状况。使用药物不良反应量表(TESS)评价安全性。结果:基线时两组一般资料无显著差异。8周末鲁拉西酮组和利培酮组有效率分别为92.11%和90.00%,两组比较P=0.676,无统计学意义。基线时两组间PANSS评分无统计学差异,在治疗2周、4周、8周两组间评分无统计学差异,8周末与基线时相比两组PANSS评分均有统计学差异(研究组t=18.154,p<0.001;对照组t=18.192,p<0.001)。治疗前后两组间SWN、SDS评分无统计学差异(P>0.05),治疗前后两组SWN评分均有统计学差异(研究组t=22.394,p<0.001;对照组t=24.230,p<0.001),SDS评分均有统计学差异(研究组t=12.256,p<0.001;对照组t=11.269,p<0.001)。两组均未见严重药物不良反应,不良事件组间发生率无统计学差异(X2/Z=0.092,p=0.762) 。结论:鲁拉西酮治疗精神分裂症与利培酮疗效相当,服药依从性高,不良反应少,可促进社会功能恢复。
Abstract
Objective: to analyze and evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of lurasidone in the treatment of schizophrenia. Methods: 78 patients who met the diagnostic criteria of ICD-10 schizophrenia were randomly divided into lurasidone group (n=38) and risperidone group (n=40). The study lasted for 8 weeks. The total clinical efficacy Rating Scale (CGI GI) and the positive and negative symptom scale (PANSS) were used to evaluate the effective rate and clinical treatment effect at baseline, 2, 4 and 8 weeks, respectively. Treatment compliance was assessed by subjective comfort scale (SWN) at baseline and 8 weeks, and social function recovery was assessed by schihan disability scale (SDS). The safety was evaluated with the adverse drug reaction scale (TESS). Results: there was no significant difference in general data between the two groups at baseline. At the end of the 8th week, the effective rates of lurasidone group and risperidone group were 92.11% and 90.00% respectively. There was no statistical significance between the two groups (p=0.676). There was no statistical difference in PANSS score between the two groups at baseline, and there was no statistical difference in PANSS score between the two groups at 2 weeks, 4 weeks and 8 weeks of treatment. There was statistical difference in PANSS score between the two groups at the end of 8 weeks compared with baseline (t=18.154, P < 0.001 in the study group; t=18.192, P < 0.001 in the control group). There was no significant difference in the scores between the two groups before and after treatment (P > 0.05), and there was significant difference in the SWN scores between the two groups before and after treatment (t=22.394, P < 0.001 in the study group; t=24.230, P < 0.001 in the control group). There was no significant difference in SDS score between the two groups before and after treatment (P > 0.05), but there was significant difference in SDS score between the two groups before and after treatment (t=12.256, P < 0.001 in the study group; t=11.269, P < 0.001 in the control group). No serious adverse drug reactions were found in both groups, and there was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events between groups (x2/z=0.092, p=0.762). Conclusion: The curative effect of Lurasidone in the treatment of schizophrenia is equivalent to that of risperidone, with high medication compliance and less adverse reactions, which can promote the recovery of social function..
关键词
精神分裂症;鲁拉西酮;利培酮;疗效;不良反应
KeyWord
schizophrenia; Lurasidone; Risperidone; Curative effect; Adverse reactions
基金项目
页码 680-682
  • 参考文献
  • 相关文献
  • 引用本文

王朔*,黄卓玮,徐娇. 鲁拉西酮治疗精神分裂症临床疗效评价 [J]. 国际精神病学杂志. 2023; 50; (4). 680 - 682.

  • 文献评论

相关学者

相关机构