中药熏蒸联合雷火灸治疗干眼症的护理效果

Nursing effect of traditional Chinese medicine fumigation combined with lightning fire moxibustion on dry eye

ES评分 0

DOI 10.12208/j.ijnr.20230232
刊名
International Journal of Nursing Research
年,卷(期) 2023, 5(5)
作者
作者单位

云南省中医医院 云南昆明 ;

摘要
分析干眼症治疗中应用中药熏蒸联合雷火灸的护理效果。方法 本次研究的干眼症患者为44例,患者均选自于2020年12月-2021年12月,应用不同护理方法分为22例对照组(中药熏蒸与人工泪液)和22例研究组(中药熏蒸联合雷火灸和人工类液),比较组间治疗效果和治疗前后的BUT、Schirmer test Ⅰ。结果 研究组和对照组的治疗效果分别为90.90%、63.63%;治疗前,组间在BUT、Schirmer test Ⅰ方面对比未展现出一定差异性,为P>0.05;治疗后,研究组的BUT、Schirmer test Ⅰ较对照组改善,组间数据对比差异为P<0.05。结论 在对干眼症治疗中,经中药熏蒸联合雷火灸应用效果良好,能使患者的各个症状改善,临床应用广泛。
Abstract
Objective: To analyze the nursing effect of traditional Chinese medicine fumigation combined with lightning fire moxibustion in the treatment of dry eye. Methods: The 44 patients with dry eye in this study were selected from December 2020 to December 2021. They were divided into 22 control groups (traditional Chinese medicine fumigation and artificial tears) and 22 study groups (traditional Chinese medicine fumigation combined with lightning fire moxibustion and artificial liquid) by different nursing methods. The treatment effects and BUT and Schirmer test I before and after treatment were compared between the two groups. Results: The therapeutic effects of the study group and the control group were 90.90% and 63.63% respectively; Before treatment, there was no certain difference in BUT and Schirmer test I between the groups (P>0.05); After treatment, the BUT and Schirmer test I in the study group were improved compared with those in the control group, and the difference between the two groups was P<0.05. Conclusion: In the treatment of dry eye, fumigation with traditional Chinese medicine combined with lightning fire moxibustion has a good effect, can improve the symptoms of patients, and is widely used in clinical practice.
关键词
中药熏蒸;雷火灸;干眼症;护理效果
KeyWord
Chinese medicine fumigation; Thunder fire moxibustion; xerophthalmia; Nursing effect
基金项目
页码 103-105
  • 参考文献
  • 相关文献
  • 引用本文

常克霞*,闻俊. 中药熏蒸联合雷火灸治疗干眼症的护理效果 [J]. 国际护理学研究. 2023; 5; (5). 103 - 105.

  • 文献评论

相关学者

相关机构