舒适护理干预联合陪护管理在感染科发热患者中的应用效果研究-国际护理学研究-CSCIED科技核心评价数据库-手机版

舒适护理干预联合陪护管理在感染科发热患者中的应用效果研究

Study on the Application Effect of Comfort Nursing Intervention Combined with Accompanying Management in Fever Patients in Infectious Diseases Department

ES评分 0 浏览量：622 下载量：0

全文阅读下载引用收藏

DOI	10.12208/j.ijnr.20230237
刊名	国际护理学研究 International Journal of Nursing Research
年，卷(期)	2023, 5(5)
作者	王文君*,
作者单位	河北省沧州市南皮县人民医院河北沧州 ;
摘要	探讨予以感染科发热患者舒适护理+陪护管理的效果。方法选取2021年6月-2022年7月进入本院接受治疗的感染科发热患者（150例）作为研究对象，按照随机数字表法将其分成对照组（常规护理）与观察组（舒适护理+陪护管理），每组75例，分析两组的护理舒适度、健康行为、退热时间等。结果护理后，观察组的生理、心理、社会文化、环境评分及总分分别为（16.68±2.57）分、（34.29±4.48）分、（31.78±3.57）分、（24.05±2.15）分、（106.87±12.62）分，均高于对照组的（12.62±2.08）分、（26.48±3.56）分、（29.45±3.34）分、（19.69±1.26）分、（87.94±10.83）分；观察组护理后的健康责任感、营养、运动锻炼、人际关系、自我实现、压力管理评分分别为（30.02±1.78）分、（28.58±2.01）分、（29.68±1.62）分、（31.01±1.62）分、（28.57±2.12）分、（30.01±2.52）分，均较对照组的（25.64±1.69）分、（23.64±1.59）分、（25.65±1.39）分、（26.65±1.48）分、（24.49±1.63）分、（25.23±2.09）分；观察组的SAS、SDS评分分别为（32.26±2.21）分、（38.52±1.55）分，低于对照组的（32.12±2.15）分、（38.58±1.69）分，退热时间为（3.23±0.69）d，短于对照组的（5.85±1.02）d；均差异显著（P＜0.05）。结论在感染科发热患者中，对其进行舒适护理干预并采取陪护管理，能够在一定程度上提高其护理舒适度，改善其健康行为，减轻负面心理，缩短退热时间。
Abstract	Objective: To explore the effect of comfortable nursing + chaperone management on patients with fever in infection department. Methods: 150 patients with fever in the Department of infection who received treatment in our hospital from June 2021 to July 2022 were selected as research objects. According to the method of random number table, they were divided into control group (routine nursing) and observation group (comfort nursing + nursing management), with 75 cases in each group. The comfort level of nursing, health behavior and time of fever reduction of the two groups were analyzed. Results: After nursing, the physiological, psychological, social and cultural, environmental scores and total scores of the observation group were (16.68±2.57) points, (34.29±4.48) points, (31.78±3.57) points, (24.05±2.15) points, (106.87±12.62) points, respectively. They were higher than the control group (12.62±2.08) points, (26.48±3.56) points, (29.45±3.34) points, (19.69±1.26) points and (87.94±10.83) points. The antipyretic time was (3.23±0.69) d, which was shorter than that in the control group (5.85±1.02) d. All the differences were significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion: In patients with fever in infection department, comfort nursing intervention and attendant management can improve their comfort level of nursing, improve their health behavior, reduce negative psychology and shorten the time of fever.
关键词	感染科；发热；舒适护理；陪护管理
KeyWord	Infectious department; Fever; Comfort care; Caregiving management
基金项目
页码	119-122

参考文献
相关文献

[1] 许雀.优质护理等方法在感染科老年肝病睡眠障碍患者中的应用效果
[J].世界睡眠医学杂志,2023,10(01): 186-188.

[2] 贺英华,刘姮,郑爱华.基础护理联合细节护理对感染科患者的影响
[J].中外医学研究,2022,20(14):89-92.

[3] 姚娟娟,张旭灵,胡丽娟,张连花,何时文.舒适护理模式对发热门诊患者临床护理指标及护理满意度的影响研究
[J].中国社区医师,2022,38(03):136-138.

[4] 韩华,王杰萍,魏彬.预见性护理对感染科满意度、医院感染率及护理满意度的影响
[J].中国医药导报,2021,18(10): 193-196.

[5] 侯婷婷.感染科护理陪护中的预见性护理管理模式应用效果
[J].当代临床医刊,2020,33(06):537+533.

[6] 皇惠丽.舒适护理联合陪护管理在感染科患者中的应用效果探讨
[J].当代护士(下旬刊),2020,27(09):135-137.

[7] 艾瑛.舒适护理在急性上呼吸道感染患者中的应用效果分析
[J].全科口腔医学电子杂志,2019,6(25):62+68.

[8] 滕旭菲.感染科护理工作中强化陪护管理的应用价值
[J].中医药管理杂志,2019,27(15):71-72.

[9] 幸文娟.感染科陪护中应用预见性护理管理的可行性研究
[J].全科口腔医学电子杂志,2019,6(16):133+136.

[10] 李峥.观察舒适护理干预对发热门诊患者护理满意度的影响
[J].家庭医药.就医选药,2018(08):344-345.

引用本文

王文君*. 舒适护理干预联合陪护管理在感染科发热患者中的应用效果研究 [J]. 国际护理学研究. 2023; 5; (5). 119 - 122.

文献评论

相关学者

相关机构