思维导图引导双元护理措施在脑垂体瘤护理中的作用

The role of mind mapping to guide dual care measures in pituitary tumour care

ES评分 0

DOI 10.12208/j.cn.20230318
刊名
Contemporary Nursing
年,卷(期) 2023, 4(7)
作者
作者单位

中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九二〇医院神经外科 云南昆明 ;

摘要
研究分析在脑垂体瘤护理工作中应用思维导图引导双元护理措施的具体效果。方法 将纳入72例脑垂体瘤患者参与实验,已经对其临床基本资料进行了简单分析,确认可入组参与实验。以对照实验形式开展本次研究,需对72例患者随机分组,具体分组方法为“摸球法”,将患者分配为对照组与观察组,每组内36例患者,在前者组中实施常规护理,后者组中则应用思维导图引导双元护理措施,分析比较具体护理效果。结果 统计了两组患者的并发症发生率,结果显示观察组中出现2例,对照组中出现6例,并发症发生率分别为5.56%、16.67%,观察组显著低于对照组,(P<0.05)。其次,评估了两组患者护理后的生活质量评分,观察组明显优于对照组,(P<0.05)。结论 对脑垂体瘤患者治疗期间应用思维导图引导双元护理措施可降低并发症风险,同时可帮助提高生活质量。
Abstract
Objective To study and analyze the specific effects of applying mind mapping-guided binary nursing measures in pituitary tumor nursing. Methods Seventy-two patients with pituitary tumors will be included in the experiment, and their basic clinical data have been briefly analyzed to confirm that they can be enrolled in the group to participate in the experiment. The study was conducted as a controlled trial, with 72 patients randomly grouped by the "touch ball method", and the patients were divided into a control group and an observation group, with 36 patients in each group. Results The incidence of complications in the two groups was counted and the results showed that there were 2 cases in the observation group and 6 cases in the control group, with complication rates of 5.56% and 16.67% respectively, with the observation group being significantly lower than the control group (p < 0.05). Secondly, the post-care quality of life scores of the two groups were assessed, and the observation group was significantly better than the control group, (P < 0.05). Conclusion The application of mind map-guided binary care measures during the treatment of pituitary tumour patients can reduce the risk of complications and may also help to improve quality of life.
关键词
脑垂体瘤;思维导图;双元护理;并发症;生活质量
KeyWord
Pituitary tumour; Mind mapping; Dual care; Complications; Quality of life
基金项目
页码 19-21
  • 参考文献
  • 相关文献
  • 引用本文

赵丽*,李秋柔. 思维导图引导双元护理措施在脑垂体瘤护理中的作用 [J]. 当代护理. 2023; 4; (7). 19 - 21.

  • 文献评论

相关学者

相关机构