全程护理干预对原发性肾病综合征糖皮质激素性骨质疏松的影响研究-当代护理-CSCIED科技核心评价数据库-手机版

全程护理干预对原发性肾病综合征糖皮质激素性骨质疏松的影响研究

Effect study of nursing intervention on glucocorticoid osteoporosis in primary nephrotic syndrome

ES评分 0 浏览量：481 下载量：0

DOI	10.12208/j.cn.20230362
刊名	当代护理 Contemporary Nursing
年，卷(期)	2023, 4(8)
作者	惠梦丹*,
作者单位	西安交通大学第一附属医院陕西西安 ;
摘要	就全程护理干预对肾病综合征的临床效果予以观察分析。方法将2022年8月到2023年2月收入本院的74例肾病综合征患者作为此次研究对象，按护理措施的不同均分为37例/组的对照组、观察组。对照组为基础护理，观察组为全程护理干预，对比治疗成果。结果从数据可见，观察组患者护理下的骨密度与对照组相比水平更好，具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。同时，观察组患者护理满意度以94.59%，高于对照组的81.08%，差异显著（P＜0.05）。最后，在对比患者生活质量核心问卷量表（QLQ-30）中，观察组的评分高于对照组，差异显著（P＜0.05）。结论针对肾病综合征患者，为其实施全程护理干预的有效性良好，可改善骨密度，并提升了护理管理的满意度，具备一定推广、应用价值。
Abstract	Objective To observe and analyze the clinical effect of whole-course nursing intervention on nephrotic syndrome. Methods 74 patients with nephrotic syndrome admitted to our hospital from August 2022 to February 2023 were selected as the subjects of this study. According to different nursing measures, they were divided into 37 cases/group control group and observation group. The control group was treated with basic nursing, and the observation group was treated with whole-course nursing intervention. Results It can be seen from the data that the bone mineral density of patients under care in the observation group was better than that in the control group, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). At the same time, the nursing satisfaction of the observation group was 94.59%, higher than that of the control group 81.08%, the difference was significant (P < 0.05). Finally, the score of the observation group was higher than that of the control group in the core questionnaire of patients quality of Life (QLQ-30), and the difference was significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion For patients with nephrotic syndrome, the effectiveness of whole-course nursing intervention is good, can improve bone density, and enhance the satisfaction of nursing management, which has certain promotion and application value.
关键词	全程护理干预；原发性肾病综合征；糖皮质激素性骨质疏松
KeyWord	Whole nursing intervention; Primary nephrotic syndrome; Glucocorticoid osteoporosis
基金项目
页码	14-16

参考文献
相关文献

[1] 张芸凤.肾病综合征患者的标准化护理干预措施
[J].中国标准化,2022(20):288-290.

[2] 陈晓丹.综合护理干预对提高肾病综合征患者用药依从性的效果
[J].中国医药指南,2022,20(03):39-42.

[3] 刘莹莹,张婷婷,郭斐.预见性护理联合气压泵按摩治疗原发性肾病综合征的效果
[J].菏泽医学专科学校学报, 2021, 33(04):57-59.

[4] 戴泳仪,林开学,方黛琪.健康意识理论指导下的护理干预在肾病综合征患者中的应用
[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2020, 26(15):72-75.

[5] 郝照繁,秦凤萍.全程护理联合三级质控对难治性肾病综合征合并急性肾功能衰竭患者肾功能的影响
[J].智慧健康,2020,6(20):74-75+78.

[6] 俞俊俊.个体化延续性护理对糖皮质激素性骨质疏松患者饮食依从性的效果研究
[J].南通大学学报(医学版),2020,40(02):179-180.

[7] 王建凤,朱勤.护理干预对糖皮质激素性骨质疏松患者骨密度的影响
[J].实用临床护理学电子杂志,2019, 4(49): 101.

[8] 陈霄.难治性肾病综合征并发急性肾功能衰竭患者全程护理及临床效果观察
[J].人人健康,2018(06):179.

[9] 倪春燕.糖皮质激素诱发的骨质疏松骨折患者护理体会
[J].海峡药学,2018,30(02):192-193.

[10] 么爽,谢红,郭静,郑建明.原发性肾病综合征并发下肢静脉血栓的危险因素分析及护理对策
[J].实用临床医药杂志,2017,21(06):55-57+64.

引用本文

惠梦丹*. 全程护理干预对原发性肾病综合征糖皮质激素性骨质疏松的影响研究 [J]. 当代护理. 2023; 4; (8). 14 - 16.

文献评论

相关学者

相关机构