Monitoring Sustainable Development: Climate and Energy Policy Indicators-Journal of Sustainability Research-CSCIED科技核心评价数据库-手机版

Monitoring Sustainable Development: Climate and Energy Policy Indicators

Monitoring Sustainable Development: Climate and Energy Policy Indicators

ES评分 0 浏览量：746 下载量：0

DOI	10.20900/jsr20200027
刊名	Journal of Sustainability Research JSR
年，卷(期)	2020, 2(3)
作者	Claudia Kettner*,Daniela Kletzan-Slamanig,Angela Köppl,Beate Littig,Irina Zielinska,
作者单位	Austrian Institute of Economic Research (WIFO), Arsenal Objekt 20, 1030 Vienna, Austria ; Institute for Advanced Studies (IHS), Josefstädter Str. 39, 1080 Vienna, Austria ;
Abstract	Both the UN SDGs and the Paris Agreement imply ambitious long-term targets that can only be met through a fundamental restructuring of economic and social systems. We propose a set of energy and climate policy indicators that allow informed policymaking and go beyond the UN indicator set. The indicators cover the whole energy system as well as the three dimensions of sustainable development. Our approach combines an energy service centered perspective with research on energy and climate indicators, and it embeds the indicator framework in the broader socio-ecologic context. We compile a set of 109 high-level energy indicators for four key sectors of energy demand (households, transport, industry and manufacturing) that can be further disaggregated to 334 indicators. For electricity and heat supply we assemble a set of 21 indicators that can be disaggregated to 54 indicators, differentiating by energy source and plant type. Interactions, i.e., synergies and conflicts, between the different target dimensions and the corresponding indicators need to be carefully considered. The main aim of the comprehensive indicator set is to help policymakers define measurable goals and strategies in the field of energy and climate policy, as well as to provide a tool for policy monitoring, evaluation and revision. The challenge in using indicator systems for policy analysis is that they have to consider a multitude of aspects in order to reflect the complexity of the issues analyzed and at the same time have to deliver concise information on various trends.
KeyWord	sustainable development; indicator systems; energy policy; climate policy
基金项目
页码	-

参考文献
相关文献

1.UNFCCC. National Inventory Reports. New York (NY, US): UNFCCC; 2019.

2.TWI2050—The World in 2050. Transformations to Achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. Laxenburg (Austria): TWI2050; 2018. Available from: http://twi2050.org. Accessed 2020 Feb 7.

3.Bierman F, Kanie N, Kim RE. Global governance by goal-setting: the novel approach of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. 2017;26-27:26–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.01.010

4.Mulholland E, Dimitrova A, Hametner M. SDG Indicators and Monitoring: Systems and Processes at the Global, European, and National Level. Vienna (Austria): ESDN Office; 2018. Report No.: Quarterly Report 48.

5.Nilsson M, Griggs D, Visbeck M. Policy: Map the interactions between Sustainable Development Goals. Nature. 2016;534:320-2. doi: 10.1038/534320a

6.McCollum DL, Echeverri LG, Busch S, Pachauri S, Parkinson S, Rogelj J, et al. Connecting the sustainable development goals by their energy inter-linkages. Environ Res Lett. 2018;13:033006. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/aaafe3

7.Blanc DL. Towards Integration at Last? The Sustainable Development Goals as a Network of Targets. Sustain Dev. 2015;23:176-87. doi: 10.1002/sd.1582

8.Nilsson M, Griggs D, Visbeck M, Ringler A. A draft framework for understanding SDG interactions. Paris (France): International Council for Science; 2016.

9.Spangenberg JH. Hot Air or Comprehensive Progress? A Critical Assessment of the SDGs. Sustain Dev. 2017;25:311-21. doi: 10.1002/sd.1657

10.Türkeli S. Complexity and the Sustainable Development Goals: A Computational Intelligence Approach to Support Policy Mix Designs. J Sustain Res. 2020;2:e200006. https://doi.org/10.20900/jsr20200006

11.Cullen JM, Allwood JM. The efficient use of energy: Tracing the global flow of energy from fuel to service. Energy Policy. 2010;38:75-81.

12.Gouveia JP. Projections of energy services demand for residential buildings: Insights from a bottom-up methodology. Energy. 2012;47:430-42. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2012.09.042

13.Haas R, Nakicenovic N, Ajanovic A, Faber T, Kranzl L, Müller A, et al. Towards sustainability of energy systems: A primer on how to apply the concept of energy services to identify necessary trends and policies. Energy Policy. 2008;36:4012-21.

14.Köppl A, Kettner C, Kletzan-Slamanig D, Schleicher S, Damm A, Steininger K, et al. Energy Transition in Austria: Designing Mitigation Wedges. Energy Environ. 2014;25:281-304. doi: 10.1260/0958-305X.25.2.281

15.Ma L, Allwood JM, Cullen JM, Li Z. The use of energy in China: Tracing the flow of energy from primary source to demand drivers. Energy. 2012;40: 174-88. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2012.02.013

16.Sovacool BK. Conceptualizing urban household energy use: Climbing the “Energy Services Ladder.” Energy Policy. 2011;39:1659-68. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.12.041

17.Sovacool BK. Security of energy services and uses within urban households. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 2011;3:218-24. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2011.06.004

18.Breuer A, Janetschek H, Malerba D. Translating Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Interdependencies into Policy Advice. Sustainability. 2019;11:2092. doi: 10.3390/su11072092

19.TWI. The world in 2050—Annual Report 2017. Laxenburg (Austria): IIASA; 2017.

20.European Commission. Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on the review of the Sustainable Development Strategy—A platform for action. Brussels (Belgium): European Commission; 2005. Report No.: /* COM/2005/0658 final */.

21.UN Social and Economic Council. Report of the Inter-Agency and Expert Group on Sustainable Development Goal Indicators. New York (NY, US): UN; 2016. Report No.: E/CN.3/2016/2/Rev.1.

22.UN. Critical milestones towards coherent, efficient and inclusive follow up and review at the global level Report of the Secretary-General. New York (NY, US): UN; 2016. Report No.: A /70/684.

23.UNCSD. Indicators of Sustainable Development: Guidelines and Methodologies. Rio de Janeiro (Brazil): UNCSD; 2001.

24.General Assembly of the UN. Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York (NY, US): General Assembly of the UN; 2015. Report No.: Seventieth session Agenda items 15 and 116. Available from: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld. Accessed 2020 Feb 7.

25.Bertelsmann Stiftung and Sustainable Development Solutions Network (SDSN). SDG Index & Dashboards A Global Report. Gütersloh (Germany): SDSN; 2016.

26.Statistics Austria. STATISTICS BRIEF AGENDA 2030—SDG-INDIKATOREN. Vienna (Austria): Statistics Austria; 2018.

27.Schepelmann P, Goossens Y, Makipaa A. Towards Sustainable Development Alternatives to GDP for measuring progress. Wuppertal (Germany): Wuppertal Institute; 2008.

28.IEA, IAEA. Indicators for Sustainable Energy Development. Paris (France): IAEA; 2001.

29.IAEA, IEA. Energy Indicators for Sustainable Development: Guidelines and Methodologies. Paris (France): IAEA; 2005.

30.Streimikiene D. Indicators for sustainable energy development in Lithuania. Nat Resour Forum. 2005;29:322-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-8947.2005.00144.x

31.Pérez D, López I, Berdellans I. Evaluation of energy policy in Cuba using ISED. Nat Resour Forum. 2005;29:298-307. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-8947.2005.00142.x

32.Medina‐Ross JA, Mata‐Sandoval JC, López‐Pérez R. Indicators for sustainable energy development in Mexico. Nat Resour Forum. 2005;29:308-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-8947.2005.00143.x

33.Davidsdottir B, Basoli DA, Fredericks S, Enterline CL. Measuring sustainable energy development with a three-dimensional index. In: Frontiers in Ecological Economic Theory and Application. Cheltenham (UK): Edward Elgar Publishing; 2007. p. 303-30.

34.Ibarrarán Viniegra ME, Davidsdottir B, Gracida Zurita R. Índice de sustentabilidad energética: estimaciones para México. Principios estudios de economía política. 2009;85-100. Spanish.

35.Martchamadol J, Kumar S. Thailand’s energy security indicators. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2012;16:6103-22.

36.Martchamadol J, Kumar S. An aggregated energy security performance indicator. Appl Energy. 2013;103:653-70. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.10.027

37.Martchamadol J, Kumar S. The Aggregated Energy Security Performance Indicator (AESPI) at national and provincial level. Appl Energy. 2014;127:219-38. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.04.045

38.Portugal-Pereira J, Esteban M. Implications of paradigm shift in Japan’s electricity security of supply: A multi-dimensional indicator assessment. Appl Energy. 2014;123:424-34. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.01.024

39.Sovacool BK, Mukherjee I. Conceptualizing and measuring energy security: A synthesized approach. Energy. 2011;36:5343-55. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2011.06.043

40.National Climate Assessment and Development Advisory Committee. National Climate Indicators System Report. Montana (US): Numerical Terradynamic Simulation Group Publications; 2014. p. 1-157. Available from: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/ntsg_pubs/376. Accessed 2020 Feb 7.

41.Germanwatch. The Climate Change Performance Index 2015. Available from: https://germanwatch.org/en/9472. Accessed 2018 Oct 23.

42.Bernauer T, Böhmelt T. National climate policies in international comparison: The Climate Change Cooperation Index. Environ Sci Policy. 2013;25:196-206. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.09.007

43.Odyssee. Odyssee database. 2019. Available from: https://www.indicators.odyssee-mure.eu/energy-efficiency-database.html. Accessed 2020 Feb 7.

44.European Energy Agency. CO2 emissions from passenger cars. Copenhagen (Denmark): European Energy Agency; 2019.

45.IEA. Energy Balances. Paris (France): IEA; 2019.

46.IEA. Energy Price Taxes. Paris (France): IEA; 2019.

47.IEA. Energy R&D Expenditures. Paris (France): IEA; 2019.

48.Eurostat. Household budget survey. Brussels (Belgium): Eurostat; 2019.

49.Eurostat. European Statistics on accidents at work (ESAW). Brussels (Belgium): Eurostat; 2019.

50.Eurostat. Labour Force Survey. Brussels (Belgium): Eurostat; 2019.

51.Eurostat. Structure of Earning Survey. Brussels (Belgium): Eurostat; 2019.

52.EU. EU Silc—Community Statistics on Income and Living Conditions. Brussels (Belgium): EU; 2019;

53.OECD. EPO database. 2019. Available from: https://stats.oecd.org/. Accessed 2020 Feb 7.

54.EEX. European Spot market primary auction prices EUAs. Leipzig (Germany): EEX; 2019.

55.Littig B. Lebensführung revisited. Zur Aktualisierung eines Konzepts im Kontext der sozial-ökologischen Transformationsforschung. Berlin (Germany): Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung; 2016. German.

56.Pimminger I, Wroblewski A. Von geschlechtsdifferenzierten Daten zu Gender- und Gleichstellungsindikatoren. In: Wroblewski A, Kelle U, Reith F, editors. Gleichstellung messbar machen: Grundlagen und Anwendungen von Gender- und Gleichstellungsindikatoren. Wiesbaden (Germany): Springer Fachmedien; 2017. p. 61-79. German. doi: 10.1007/978-3-658-13237-8_4

57.Pimminger I. Theoretische Grundlagen zur Operationalisierung von Gleichstellung. In: Wroblewski A, Kelle U, Reith F, editors. Gleichstellung messbar machen: Grundlagen und Anwendungen von Gender- und Gleichstellungsindikatoren. Wiesbaden (Germany): Springer Fachmedien; 2017. p. 39-60. German. doi: 10.1007/978-3-658-13237-8_3

58.Röhr U. Genderaspekte des Klimawandels—Ursachen, Auswirkungen, Gestaltungsmacht. Klimawandel, Klimaschutz und Gender. Bonn (Germany): Friedrich-Engelbert-Stiftung; 2008.

59.Räty R, Carlsson-Kanyama A. Energy consumption by gender in some European countries. Energy Policy. 2010;38:646-9. Available from: https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v38y2010i1p646-649.html. Accessed 2020 Feb 7.

60.Kettner C, Kletzan-Slamanig D, Köppl A, Littig B, Zielinska I. A Cross-Country Comparison of Sustainable Energy Development in Selected EU Members. J Sustain Res. 2019;1:e190017. https://doi.org/10.20900/jsr20190017

61.Guijarro F, Poyatos JA. Designing a Sustainable Development Goal Index through a Goal Programming Model: The Case of EU-28 Countries. Sustainability. 2018;10:3167. doi: 10.3390/su10093167

62.Guijarro F. A Multicriteria Model for the Assessment of Countries’ Environmental Performance. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16:2868. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16162868

63.Biggeri M, Clark DA, Ferrannini A, Mauro V. Tracking the SDGs in an ‘integrated’ manner: A proposal for a new index to capture synergies and trade-offs between and within goals. World Dev. 2019;122:628-47. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.05.022

引用本文

Claudia Kettner*,Daniela Kletzan-Slamanig,Angela Köppl,Beate Littig,Irina Zielinska. Monitoring Sustainable Development: Climate and Energy Policy Indicators, Journal of Sustainability Research. 2020; 2; (3). https://doi.org/10.20900/jsr20200027.

文献评论

相关学者

相关机构