Situated Precision Healthcare in the Smart Medical Home: Bringing NASA’s Research Strategy down to Earth-Advances in Geriatric Medicine and Research-CSCIED科技核心评价数据库-手机版

Situated Precision Healthcare in the Smart Medical Home: Bringing NASA’s Research Strategy down to Earth

Situated Precision Healthcare in the Smart Medical Home: Bringing NASA’s Research Strategy down to Earth

ES评分 0 浏览量：640 下载量：0

DOI	10.20900/agmr20200017
刊名	Advances in Geriatric Medicine and Research AGMR
年，卷(期)	2020, 2(3)
作者	Gary Riccio*,Rhoda Au,Richard van Emmerik,Mohammed Eslami,
作者单位	Nascent Science Technology LLC, Boston, MA 02108, USA ; Department of Neurology and Alzheimer’s Disease Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02118, USA ; School of Public Health and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA ; Netrias LLC, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA ;
Abstract	This special issue is ambitious in that it calls for strategic transformation in research on Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) and related dementias, including innovation in both research design and value delivery, through lifestyle interventions that implicitly relate to a much broader range of comorbidities and diseases of aging. One response to this challenge is to venture beyond the boundaries of research that supports the healthcare industry. Toward this end, we introduce opportunities for research translation and knowledge transfer from NASA to the healthcare industry. Our intent is to show how NASA’s approach to research can guide innovation for a smart medical home, most notably for AD and other diseases of aging. The article is organized in four major sections: (a) aggregating fragmented research communities; (b) lifestyle interventions in the medical home; (c) multiscale computational modeling and analysis; and (d) lifespan approach to precision brain health. We provide novel motivations and transformative paths to a diversity of specific lines of research, across communities, that would be difficult to discover in common methods of networking within research communities and even through sophisticated bibliographic methods. We thus reveal how knowledge transfer between the public and private sector can stimulate development of broader scientific communities and achieve a more coherent strategic approach to integration and development of a diversity of capabilities including but not limited to technology.
KeyWord	aging; digital biomarkers; systems medicine; precision health; isolation; confinement
基金项目
页码	-

参考文献
相关文献

1.Montero‐Odasso M, Verghese J, Beauchet O, Hausdorff JM. Gait and cognition: a complementary approach to understanding brain function and the risk of falling. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;60(11):2127-36.

2.Roitto H, Kautiainen H, Öhman H, Savikko N, Strandberg TE, Raivio M, et al. Relationship of neuropsychiatric symptoms with falls in Alzheimer's disease–does exercise modify the risk? J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018;66(12):2377-81.

3.Riccio G, Shelhamer M, Menon J. Synergy between developers and stakeholders for autonomous medical decision making. In: Proceedings of 2020 NASA Human Research Program Investigatorsʼ Workshop; 2020 Jan 27-30; Galveston, US.

4.Riccio G, Vicente K. Coping with change and novelty in energy facility operations: Recommendations for knowledge-based, extra-procedural problem solving. In: Electrical Power Research Institute Report 1004666. Palo Alto (CA, US): EPRI; 2001.

5.Carter R. Helping yourself help others: A book for caregivers. New York (US): Three Rivers Press; 1994.

6.Peterson B. Voices of Alzheimer’s: Courage, humor, hope and love in the face of dementia. Cambridge (MA, US): Da Capo Press; 2004.

7.Au R. Heterogeneity in Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias. Adv Geriatr Med Res. 2019;1:e190010. https://doi.org/10.20900/agmr20190010

8.Riccio G. Toward Situated Precision Health in the Smart Medical Home: Insight and Innovation from NASA’s Metascience. In Translational Research Institute for Space Medicine. Washington D.C. (US): NASA; 2020. NASA Cooperative Agreement NNX16AO69A.

9.Riccio G, Eslami M, Au R. Pasteur’s quadrant for cross-domain scientific progress in situated precision health. 2017. Unpublished work.

10.Kitson A, Powell K, Hoon E, Newbury J, Wilson A, Beilby J. Knowledge translation within a population health study: how do you do it? Implement Sci. 2013;8(1):54.

11.Kitson A, Brook A, Harvey G, Jordan Z, Marshall R, O’Shea R, et al. Using complexity and network concepts to inform healthcare knowledge translation. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018;7(3):231.

12.Au R, Ritchie M, Hardy S, Ang TFA, Lin H. Aging well: Using precision to drive down costs and increase heal. Adv Geriatr Med Res. 2019;1:e190003. https://doi.org/10.20900/agmr20190003

13.Maslow A. Toward a psychology of being. New York (US): Van Nostrand; 1968.

14.Peterson C, Seligman EP. Character, strength, and virtues. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press; 2004.

15.Dahlberg K, Todres L, Galvin K. Lifeworld-led healthcare is more than patient-led care: An existential view of well-being. Med Health Care Philos. 2009;12(3):265-71.

16.Sundström M, Blomqvist K, Edberg AK, Rämgård M. The context of care matters: Older people's existential loneliness from the perspective of healthcare professionals—A multiple case study. Int J Older People Nurs. 2019;e12234.

17.Mindock J, Reilly J, Rubin D, Urbina M, Hailey M, Cerro JA, et al. Systems Engineering for Space Exploration Medical Capabilities. Presented at: AIAA SPACE and Astronautics Forum and Exposition; 2017 Sep 12-17; Orlando, US. Reston (US): American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics; 2017. p. 5236.

18.Hanson A, Mindock J, Okon S, Hailey M, McGuire K, Bardina J, et al. A Model-Based Systems Engineering Approach to Exploration Medical System Development. In: Proceedings of 2019 IEEE Aerospace Conference; 2019 Mar 2-9; Big Sky US. New York (US): IEEE; 2019. p. 1-19.

19.Ngandu T, Lehtisalo J, Solomon A, Levälahti E, Ahtiluoto S, Antikainen R, et al. A 2 year multidomain intervention of diet, exercise, cognitive training, and vascular risk monitoring versus control to prevent cognitive decline in at-risk elderly people (FINGER): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;385(9984):2255-63.

20.Williamson JD, Pajewski NM, Auchus AP, Bryan RN, Chelune G, Cheung AK, et al. Effect of intensive vs standard blood pressure control on probable dementia: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2019;321(6):553-561.

21.Zucchella C, Sinforiani E, Tamburin S, Federico A, Mantovani E, Bernini S, et al. The multidisciplinary approach to Alzheimerʼs Disease and Dementia. A narrative review of non-pharmacological treatment. Front Neurol. 2018;9:1058.

22.Lehtisalo J, Levälahti E, Lindström J, Hänninen T, Paajanen T, Peltonen M, et al. Dietary changes and cognition over 2 years within a multidomain intervention trial—The Finnish Geriatric Intervention Study to Prevent Cognitive Impairment and Disability (FINGER). Alzheimers Dement. 2019;15(3):410-7.

23.Hayden KM, Baker LD, Bray G, Carvajal R, Demos-McDermott K, Hergenroeder AL, et al. Long-term impact of intensive lifestyle intervention on cognitive function assessed with the National Institutes of Health Toolbox: The Look AHEAD study. Alzheimers Dement. 2018;10:41-8.

24.Espeland MA, Erickson K, Neiberg RH, Jakicic JM, Wadden TA, Wing RR, .et al. Brain and white matter hyperintensity volumes after 10 years of random assignment to lifestyle intervention. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(5):764-71.

25.Brewster L, Tarrant C, Willars J, Armstrong N. Measurement of harms in community care: a qualitative study of use of the NHS safety thermometer. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018;27(8):625-32.

26.Teri L, Logsdon RG, McCurry SM, Pike KC, McGough EL. Translating an evidence-based multicomponent intervention for older adults with dementia and caregivers. Gerontologist. 2020;60(3):548-57. doi: 10.1093/geront/gny122

27.Fertalova T, Ondriova I. Non-pharmacological treatment of Alzheimer’s. In Alzheimerʼs Dementia and Korsakoffʼs Disease-Linking Memory Pathology to the Autobiographical Self. IntechOpen. 2019. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.84893

28.Atri A. Current and future treatments in Alzheimerʼs Disease. Semin Neurol. 2019;39(02):227-40.

29.National Aeronautics and Space Administration. NASA Strategic Plan 2018. Washington (DC, US): NASA; 2018.

30.Shelhamer M. A call for research to assess and promote functional resilience in astronaut crews. J Appl Physiol. 2016;120(4):471-2.

31.Shelhamer M. Enabling and enhancing human health and performance for Mars colonies: Smart spacecraft and smart habitats. In: The Human Factor in a Mission to Mars. Cham (Switzerland): Springer; 2019. p. 59-67.

32.Human Research Program. Human Research Program: Program plan. HRP-47051, Revision D. Available from: https://www.nasa.gov/pdf/503445main_HRP47051_ProgramPlan_508.pdf/. Accessed 2020 Jun 9.

33.National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The human research roadmap. Available from: https://humanresearchroadmap.nasa.gov/architecture/. Accessed 2020 Jun 9.

34.Hailey M, Bardina J, McGuire K, Urbina M, Hanson A, Cerro J, et al. Exploration Medical Capability Medical System Recommendations for Gateway. In Proceedings of 2019 NASA Human Research Program Investigatorsʼ Workshop; 2019 Jan 22-25; Galveston, USA.

35.National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Analog missions. Available from: https://www.nasa.gov/analogs. Accessed 2019 Nov 24.

36.Davenport C. Even astronauts get ornery: Coronavirus advice from those who have endured social distancing in the extreme. Available from: https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2020/04/16/astronauts-quarantine-advice-coronavirus/. Accessed 2020 Jun 9.

37.Cowing K. The Parallels between Space Missions and COVID-19 Isolation. Available from: http://spaceref.com/coronavirus/the-parallels-between-space-missions-and-covid-19-isolation.html. Accessed 2020 Jun 9.

38.Russell A. What Submarine Crews and Astronauts Can Teach Us About Isolation. The New Yorker. 2020 Apr 9.

39.Kelly S. I Spent a Year in Space, and I Have Tips on Isolation to Share. New York Times. 2020 Mar 21.

40.Brown N. Retired astronaut who spent 665 days in space gives advice on pandemic isolation: Remember “bigger purpose”. CBS News. 2020 Mar 22.

41.Tachibana K, Tachibana S, Inoue N. From outer space to Earth—The social significance of isolated and confined environment research in human space exploration. Acta Astronaut. 2017;140:273-83.

42.Simpson AT, Doarn CR, Garber SJ. Interagency cooperation in the twilight of the Great Society: Telemedicine, NASA, and the Papago Nation. J Policy Hist. 2020;32(1):25-51.

43.Schrage M, Kiron D. Leading with next-generation key performance indicators. MIT Sloan Management Review. 2018 Jun 16.

44.Harvard Business Review Analytical Services. Taking the pulse of health care transformation. Harvard Business Review. 2017 Nov 22.

45.Saxena S, Nolen W, Spencer B, Koslow L. Health care consumerism is real—and providers need to adapt. Boston Consulting Group. 2016 Aug 10.

46.Cordina J, Kumar R, Martin CP, Jones EP. Healthcare consumerism 2018: An update on the journey. Available from: https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/healthcare-systems-and-services/our-insights/healthcare-consumerism-2018. Accessed 2020 Jun 9.

47.Reddy P, Onitskansky E, Singhal S, Velamoor S. Why the evolving healthcare services and technology market matters. Available from: https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/healthcare-systems-and-services/our-insights/why-the-evolving-healthcare-services-and-technology-market-matters. Accessed 2020 Jun 9.

48.Mazzucato M, Roy V. Rethinking value in health innovation: from mystifications towards prescriptions. J Econ Policy Reform. 2019;22(2):101-19.

49.Huckman R. What will U.S. health care look like after the pandemic? Available from: https://hbr.org/2020/04/what-will-u-s-health-care-look-like-after-the-pandemic. Accessed 2020 Apr 7.

50.University of Massachusetts Amherst. Center for personalized health monitoring. Available from: https://www.umass.edu/cphm/. Accessed 2019 Dec 14.

51.University of Massachusetts Amherst. Institute for applied life sciences: Center for Human Health and Performance. Available from: https://www.umass.edu/ials/ch2p. Accessed 2019 Dec 14.

52.Park G, Lu E, Lester M, Pye J, Sullivan R, Riccio G. Technology survey and assessment for the U.S. Army’s Objective Force Warrior Program. In: the 8th Annual International Conference on Industrial Engineering, Theory, Applications, and Practice; 2003 Nov 10-12; Las Vegas, USA.

53.Riccio G. A case study in expeditionary community development. Unpublished work. 2020.

54.Riccio G. Situated collaborative problem solving. Unpublished work. 2015.

55.Zwart S, Mullenax C, Bloomberg J, Crucian B, Lee S, Ott M, et al. Spaceflight Standard Measures. Available from: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20180002943. Accessed 2020 Jun 9. JSC-E-DAA-TN55761.

56.Roma PG, Landon LB, Schneiderman JS. Overview of NASA Behavioral Health Performance Standard Measures. Presented at the annual meeting of the Aerospace Medical Association; 2019 May 5-9; Las Vegas, USA.

57.Krihak M, Middour C, Gurram M, Wolfe S, Marker N, Winther S, et al. Medical Data Architecture (MDA) Project Status. In: 2018 NASA Human Research Program Investigatorsʼ Workshop; 2018 Jan 22-25; Galveston, USA.

58.Riccio G, Shelhamer M, Menon J. Synergy between developers and stakeholders for autonomous medical decision making. In: 2020 NASA Human Research Program Investigatorsʼ Workshop; 2020 Jan 27-30; Galveston, USA.

59.Hafner M, Stepanek M, Taylor J, Troxel WM, van Stolk C. Why sleep matters—the economic costs of insufficient sleep: a cross-country comparative analysis. Rand Health Q. 2017;6(4):11. https://doi.org/10.7249/RR1791

60.Vincent C, Amalberti R. Safety strategies for care in the home. In: Safer Healthcare. Cham (Switzerland): Springer; 2016. p. 93-111.

61.Cavuoto L, Megahed F. Understanding fatigue and the implications for worker safety. In: ASSE Professional Development Conference and Exposition; 2016 Jun 26-29; Atlanta, USA.

62.Richardson KM. Managing employee stress and wellness in the new millennium. J Occup Health Psychol. 2017;22(3):423-8.

63.Null C, Adduru V, Amman O, Cardoza C, Stewart M, Avrekh I, et al. Human Performance Contributions to Safety in Commercial Aviation. Available from: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20190001429. Accessed 2020 Jun 9. NASA/TM-2019-220254 (NESC-RP-18-01304).

64.Reason J. The human contribution: unsafe acts, accidents and heroic recoveries. Boca Raton (US): CRC Press; 2017.

65.National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Lifetime Surveillance of Astronaut Health (LSAH). Available from: https://lsda.jsc.nasa.gov/LSAH/LSAH_Home. Accessed 2019 Nov 27.

66.Zierer J, Menni C, Kastenmüller G, Spector TD. Integration of ‘omics’ data in aging research: from biomarkers to systems biology. Aging Cell. 2015;14(6):933-44.

67.Paschkewitz J. Simplifying complexity in scientific discovery (SIMPLEX). Available from: http://www.darpa.mil/program/simplifying-complexity-in-scientific-discovery. Accessed 2020 Jun 9.

68.Cross R, Rebele R, Grant A. Collaborative overload. Available from: https://hbr.org/2016/01/collaborative-overload. Accessed 2020 Jun 9.

69.Cross R, Davenport TH, Gray P. Collaborate Smarter, Not Harder. MIT Sloan Manag Rev. 2019;61(1):20-8.

70.Myers J, Garcia Y, Griffin D, Arellano J, Boley L, Goodenow D, et al. The integrated medical model: Outcomes from independent review. Available from: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20170004392. Accessed 2020 Jun 9.

71.National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering. Interagency Modeling and Analysis Group (IMAG). Available from: https://www.nibib.nih.gov/research-funding/interagency-modeling-and-analysis-group-imag. Accessed 2019 Nov 27.

72.Leinweber L, McIntyre L, Goodenow D, Gilkey K, Myers J. A medical extensible dynamic probabilistic risk assessment tool (MEDPRAT) prototype. In: 2019 NASA Human Research Program Investigatorsʼ Workshop; 2019 Jan 22-25; Galveston, USA.

73.Rasmussen J, Suedung I. Proactive risk management in a dynamic society. Karlstad (Sweden): Swedish Rescue Services Agency; 2000.

74.Cohen M, Junge M. Space Station Crew Safety: Human Factors Model. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 28th Annual Meeting; 1984 Oct 22-26; Orlando, USA. Santa Monica (CA, US): Human Factors and Ergonomics Society; 1984. p. 908-12.

75.Cohen M, Haeuplik-Meusburger S. What do we give up and Leave behind? In: 45th International Conference on Environmental Systems; 2015 Jul 12-16; Washington, US. ICES-2015-56.

76.Davenport TH. Can we solve Alʼs ʻtrust problemʼ? MIT Sloan Manag Rev. 2019;60(2):18-9.

77.Wilson HJ, Daugherty PR. Collaborative intelligence: humans and AI are joining forces. Harvard Bus Rev. 2018;96(4):114-23.

78.Jung JJ. Computational collective intelligence with big data: Challenges and opportunities. Future Gener Comput Sys. 2017;66,87-8.

79.Snyder J, Schultz L, Walbert T. The role of tumor board conferences in neuro-oncology: a nationwide provider survey. J Neuro-Oncol. 2017;133(1):1-7. doi: 10.1007/s11060-017-2416-x

80.Knepper TC, Bell GC, Hicks JK, Padron E, Teer JK, Vo TV, et al. Key lessons learned from Moffitt's molecular tumor board: The Clinical Genomics Action Committee Experience. Oncologist. 2017;22(2):144-51.

81.Chiu C. Real-time metagenomic next-generation analysis for diagnosis of infectious diseases. In: Omics Workshop; 2017 Apr 11; Houston, USA.

82.Riccio G. Omics planning in the context of outcomes-based innovation and integration in NASA’s Human Health and Performance Directorate. Houston (TX, US): KBRwyle; 2016. Contractor report: NASA Contract NNJ15HK11B.

83.Flores M, Glusman G, Brogaard K, Price ND, Hood L. P4 medicine: how systems medicine will transform the healthcare sector and society. Pers Med. 2013;10(6):565-76.

84.Vogt H, Hofmann B, Getz L. The new holism: P4 systems medicine and the medicalization of health and life itself. Medicine, Health Care Philos. 2016;19(2):307-23.

85.National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Space Flight Human System Standard—Volume 1: Crew Health. Available from: https://standards.nasa.gov/standard/nasa/nasa-std-3001-vol-1. Accessed 2020 Jun 9. NASA-STD-3001.

86.National Aeronautics and Space Administration. NASA Space Flight Human System Standard—Volume 2: Human Factors, Habitability, and Environmental Health. Available from: https://standards.nasa.gov/standard/nasa/nasa-std-3001-vol-2. Accessed 2020 Jun 9. NASA-STD-3001.

87.National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Human-rating requirements for space systems. Washington (DC, US): NASA; 2017. NPR 8705.2C.

88.National Aeronautics and Space Administration. NASA Systems Engineering Processes and Requirements. (2020). NPR 7123.1C. Available from: https://nodis3.gsfc.nasa.gov/displayDir.cfm?t=NPR&c=7123&s=1B. Accessed 2020 Jun 28.

89.Kusumoto Y, Makita H, Nagai K, Yamane T. Recognition of roles of various professionals by home-visiting specialists. J Phys Ther Sci. 2018;30(6):800-3.

90.Romagnoli KM, Handler SM, Hochheiser H. Home care: more than just a visiting nurse. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22(12):972–4.

91.Hanney SR, Castle-Clarke S, Grant J, Guthrie S, Henshall C, Mestre-Ferrandiz J, et al. How long does biomedical research take? Studying the time taken between biomedical and health research and its translation into products, policy, and practice. Health Res Policy Sys. 2015;13(1):1.

92.Morris ZS, Wooding S, Grant J. The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research. J R Soc Med. 2011;104(12):510-20.

93.Ildstad ST, Evans CH Jr. Editors. Small clinical trials: issues and challenges. Washington D.C. (US): National Academies Press; 2001.

94.Kravitz R, Duan N, Eslick I, Gabler NB, Kaplan HC. Design and Implementation of N-of-1 Trials: a user’s guide. Rockville (US): Agency for healthcare research and quality, US Department of Health and Human Services; 2014.

95.Metaphor SB, Nicholas SBD. Personalized Medicine: Time for One-Person Trials. Nature. 2015;520(7549):609-11. doi: 10.1038/520609a

96.Tate RL, Perdices M, Rosenkoetter U, McDonald S, Togher L, Shadish W, et al. The Single-Case Reporting guideline In BEhavioural interventions (SCRIBE) 2016: Explanation and elaboration. Arch Sci Psychol. 2016;4:10-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/arc0000027

97.Sampson M. NHLBI marks year 70 of Iconic Framingham Heart Study. Available from: https://nihrecord.nih.gov/2018/02/23/nhlbi-marks-year-70-iconic-framingham-heart-study. Accessed 2020 Jun 9.

98.Framingham Heart Study (no date). Epidemiological background and design: The Framingham Heart Study. Available from: https://www.framinghamheartstudy.org/fhs-about/history/epidemiological-background/. Accessed 2019 Dec 19.

99.Fitts MA, Kerstman E, Butler DJ, Walton ME, Minard CG, Saile LG, et al. The Integrated Medical Model: Statistical Forecasting of Risks to Crew Health and Mission Success. (2008). Available from: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20080010658.pdf. Accessed 2020 Jun 28.

100.Business Insider. Future demand for elderly care services like assisted living in-home care are rife for digital disruption. Available from: https://www.businessinsider.in/science/news/future-demand-for-elderly-care-services-like-assisted-living-in-home-care-are-rife-for-digital-disruption/articleshow/71599033.cms. Accessed 2019 Nov 22.

101.Hodes R. NIAʼs 2020 vision: Continued advancements in aging research! Available from: https://www.nia.nih.gov/research/blog/2020/01/nias-2020-vision-continued-advancements-aging-research. Accessed 2020 Jun 9.

引用本文

Gary Riccio*,Rhoda Au,Richard van Emmerik,Mohammed Eslami. Situated Precision Healthcare in the Smart Medical Home: Bringing NASA’s Research Strategy down to Earth, Advances in Geriatric Medicine and Research. 2020; 2; (3). https://doi.org/10.20900/agmr20200017.

文献评论

相关学者

相关机构