Designing Responsible Innovation Ecosystems for the Mobilisation of Resources from Business and Finance to Accelerate the Implementation of Sustainability. A View from Industry-Journal of Sustainability Research-CSCIED科技核心评价数据库-手机版

Designing Responsible Innovation Ecosystems for the Mobilisation of Resources from Business and Finance to Accelerate the Implementation of Sustainability. A View from Industry

Designing Responsible Innovation Ecosystems for the Mobilisation of Resources from Business and Finance to Accelerate the Implementation of Sustainability. A View from Industry

ES评分 0 浏览量：632 下载量：0

全文阅读下载引用收藏

DOI	10.20900/jsr20200033
刊名	Journal of Sustainability Research JSR
年，卷(期)	2020, 2(4)
作者	Marc Dreyer*,Joachim von Heimburg,Anne Goldberg,Monica Schofield,
作者单位	Futopedia-Consulting, Champsot 28, CH-1822 Sonzier, Switzerland ; jvhinnovation LLC, Hellring 5, CH-4125, Riehen, Switzerland ; Independent R&I expert, avenue des sports 3, 7900 Leuze-en-Hainaut, Belgium ; Tutech Innovation, Harburger Schloßstr. 6-12, 21079 Hamburg, Germany ;
Abstract	The idea of Responsible Innovation, which deals with delivering economic profit and sustainable value to all stakeholders, is gaining wider acceptance as innovation is seen as a holistic process of delivering impacts valued by all stakeholders, i.e., society, users/consumers, and shareholders. Implementing the idea of Responsible Innovation requires an anticipation of the expectations of, and impact on, all stakeholders, the trends in regulation, and an ability to integrate continuously the latest scientific findings. Due to the financially risky nature of the innovation process, industry as the main provider of innovation must play an active and leading role that must be balanced with its fiduciary duties. Implementing Responsible Innovations is therefore a collaborative process between industry, government, academia and society, each playing a critical role in upholding the “4 gears” of an innovation ecosystem that we present here for discussion. The learnings from the failure to fight climate change and from game theory can be used to design such an ecosystem that embeds the necessary incentives to attract innovators and investors motivated to act responsibly. In this perspective paper, we present the views from innovation practitioners from industry on the different elements and typical present shortcomings of such an innovation ecosystem and we make proposals that should be addressed in order to generate innovations that truly deliver benefits to all stakeholders and train the innovation managers that will enable them.
KeyWord	responsible innovation; sustainable finance; innovation ecosystem; fiduciary duty; impact assessment; sustainability
基金项目
页码	-

参考文献
相关文献

1.EIRMA Working Group on Responsible Innovation. Available from: https://www.eirma.org/EIRMA/Collaboration_Centre/EIRMA_Task_Force/EIRMA/Collaboration_Center/EIRMA_Task_Force/EIRMA_Task_force_on_Responsible_Innovation.aspx?hkey=328e8693-ce41-449c-8a33-010a22138668. Accessed 2020 Jul 13.

2.Lubberink B, Blok V, van Ophem J, Omta O. Lessons for Responsible Innovation in the Business Context: A Systematic Literature Review of Responsible, Social and Sustainable Innovation Practices. Sustainability. 2017;9:721.

3.Blok V, Lemmens P. The Emerging Concept of Responsible Innovation. Three Reasons Why It Is Questionable and Calls for a Radical Transformation of the Concept of Innovation. In: Koops BJ, Oosterlaken I, Romijn H, Swierstra T, van den Hoven J, editors. Responsible Innovation 2. Cham (Switzerland): Springer; 2015.

4.Gerber A, Forsberg E-M, Shelley-Egan C, Arias R, Daimer S, Dalton G, et al. Joint declaration on mainstreaming RRI across Horizon Europe. J Respons Innovat. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2020.1764837

5.Chefneux L. Why innovate? What are the challenges for Europe? Brussels (Belgium): Royal Academy of Belgium; 2017

6.Dreyer M, Chefneux L, Goldberg A, Von Heimburg J, Patrignani N, Schofield M, et al. Responsible Innovation: A Complementary View from Industry with Proposals for Bridging Different Perspectives. Sustainability. 2017;9(10):1719.

7.What’s Wrong with Science—and How to Fix It. Scientific American. 2018 Oct 1. Available from: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/whats-wrong-with-science-and-how-to-fix-it/. Accessed 2020 Jul 13.

8.Scientific American. The Science behind the Debates. New York (NY, US): Scientific American; 2019. Available from: https://www.scientificamerican.com/store/books/the-science-behind-the-debates/. Accessed 2020 Jul 13.

9.Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Available from: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld. Accessed 2020 Jul 13.

10.Schultz M, Tyrrell TD, Ebenhard T. The 2030 Agenda and Ecosystems—A discussion paper on the links between the Aichi Biodiversity Targets and the Sustainable Development Goals. Stockholm (Sweden): SwedBio at Stockholm Resilience Centre; 2016. Available from: http://swed.bio/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/The-2030-Agenda-and-Ecosystems_spread.pdf. Accessed 2020 Jul 13.

11.Swan RB. A Critical Analysis of the Sustainable Development Goals. In: Leal Filho W, editor. Handbook of Sustainability Science and Research. Cham (Switzerland): Springer; 2018.

12.Awad E, Dsouza S, Kim R, Schulz J, Henrich J, Shariff A, et al. The Moral Machine Experiment. Nature. 2018;563:59-64.

13.Priorities of Progress - Understanding citizens’ voices. London (UK): The Economist Intelligence Unit (2018). Available from: https://prioritiesofprogress.economist.com/whitepaper. Accessed 2020 Jul 13.

14.Gekeler M. A Practical Guide to Design Thinking. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. 2019. Available from: http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/indien/15404-20190508.pdf. Accessed 2020 Jul 13.

15.Osterwalder A, Pigneux Y, Business Model Generation. Hoboken (NJ, US): Johh Wileys & Sons, 2010. Available from: https://www.strategyzer.com/books/business-model-generation. Accessed 2020 Jul 13.

16.Laplume AO, Sonpar K, Litz RA. Stakeholder Theory: Reviewing a Theory That Moves Us. J Manag. 2008;34(6):1152-89. doi: 10.1177/0149206308324322

17.PMBOK® Guide 6th Edition Knowledge Areas for Project Management - Process Groups and Processes - The Complete Guide. Orange (CA, US): OSP International LLC; 2017.

18.Plattner H, Meinel C, Leifer L. Design Thinking. Cham (Switzerland): Springer; 2011.

19.A Quadruple Helix guide for innovations. Värmland County (Sweden): Värmland County Administrative Board; 2018. Available from: https://northsearegion.eu/media/5326/quadruple-helix-guide-version-20180612.pdf. Accessed 2020 Jul 13.

20.Sustainable Product Design: Sustainable Design Principles. Available from: http://guides.library.illinois.edu/c.php?g=347670&p=2344606. Accessed 2020 Jul 13 .

21.D4S-Design for Sustainability a step-by-step approach. Delft (Netherland): UNEP-TU Delft. 2009. Available from: http://www.d4s-sbs.org/d4s_sbs_manual_site.pdf. Accessed 2020 Jul 13.

22.Mahmood P, Kondis A, Stehli S. Frugal innovation: Creating and capturing value in emerging markets. IMD. 2014. Available from: https://www.imd.org/research-knowledge/articles/frugal-innovation-creating-and-capturing-value-in-emerging-markets/. Accessed 2020 Jul 13.

23.Engber D. Does the Trolley Problem Have a Problem? Slate. 2018 Jun 18. Available from: https://slate.com/technology/2018/06/psychologys-trolley-problem-might-have-a-problem.html. Accessed 2020 Jul 13.

24.IAIA. International Association for Impact Assessment—definitions. Available from: https://www.iaia.org/index.php. Accessed 2020 Jul 13.

25.IAIA. International Association for Impact Assessment—best practices. Available from: https://www.iaia.org/best-practice.php. Accessed 2020 Jul 13.

26.Ecosense - Assessing Environmental and Social Impacts. Available from: https://econsense.de/app/uploads/2018/06/econsense_Assessing-Environmental-and-Social-Impacts_2015.pdf. Accessed 2020 Jul 13.

27.Measuring Socio-Economic Impact: A guide for business. WBCSD. 2013 Feb 27. Available from: https://www.wbcsd.org/Programs/Redefining-Value/External-Disclosure/Reporting-matters/Resources/Measuring-Socio-Economic-Impact-A-guide-for-business. Accessed 2020 Jul 13.

28.Guidelines for Environmental and Social Impact Assessment. WBCSD. 2016 Aug 09. Available from: https://www.wbcsd.org/Sector-Projects/Cement-Sustainability-Initiative/Resources/Guidelines-for-Environmental-and-Social-Impact-Assessment-ESIA. Accessed 2020 Jul 13.

29.Measuring Impact—Framework Methodology. World Bank &co. Available from: https://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/74e39894-d73e-4ffb-a790-fdf545ad85b5/Measuring%2BImpact%2BFramework%2BMethodology.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CACHEID=ROOTWORKSPACE-74e39894-d73e-4ffb-a790-fdf545ad85b5-jqetwyA. Accessed 2020 Jul 13.

30.IRIS. How to use the IRIS metrics in the preparation of a sustainability report based on the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines. Available from: https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/Linking-GRI-and-IRIS.pdf. Accessed 2020 Jul 13.

31.IAIA. The leading global network on impact assessment. Available from: https://www.iaia.org/. Accessed 2020 Jul 13.

32.The Impact Management Project. Available from: https://impactmanagementproject.com/. Accessed 2020 Jul 13.

33.33. IMPAAKT—a crowdsourced sustainability platform. Available from: https://www.impaakt.com/. Accessed 2020 Jul 13.

34.Center of Theory of Change—Setting Standards for Theory of Change. Available from: https://www.theoryofchange.org/what-is-theory-of-change/. Accessed 2020 Jul 13.

35.Toward Common Metrics and Consistent Reporting of Sustainable Value Creation. WEF. 2020. Available from: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_IBC_ESG_Metrics_Discussion_Paper.pdf. Accessed 2020 Jul 13.

36.What’s Wrong with Science—and How to Fix It. Scientific American. 2018 Oct 1. Available from: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/whats-wrong-with-science-and-how-to-fix-it/. Accessed 2020 Jul 13.

37.Monya B. Is there a reproducibility Crisis. Nature. 2016;533:452-4.

38.Harker D. Creating Scientific Controversies. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press; 2015.

39.Zwilling M. 10 Ways For Start-ups To Survive The Valley Of Death. Forbes. 2013 Feb 18. Available from: https://www.forbes.com/sites/martinzwilling/2013/02/18/10-ways-for-startups-to-survive-the-valley-of-death/. Accessed 2020 Jul 13.

40.Barton D, Manyika J, Williamson SK. Finally, Evidence That Managing for the Long Term Pays Off. HBR. 2017 Feb 07. Available from: https://hbr.org/2017/02/finally-proof-that-managing-for-the-long-term-pays-off. Accessed 2020 Jul 13.

41.Ocean Tomo—Intangible Asset Market Value Study. Available from: https://www.oceantomo.com/intangible-asset-market-value-study/. Accessed 2020 Jul 13.

42.Big business is beginning to accept broader social responsibilities. The Economist. 2019 Aug 22. Available from: https://www.economist.com/briefing/2019/08/22/big-business-is-beginning-to-accept-broader-social-responsibilities. Accessed 2020 Jul 13.

43.Fiduciary Duty in the 21st Century. UNEP. Available from: https://www.unpri.org/download?ac=1378. Accessed 2020 Jul 13.

44.Birshan M. Meakin T. Strovink K. Short-term pain for long-term gain: The new CEO’s dilemma. McKinsey Quarterly. 2019 Apr 22. Available from: https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/short-term-pain-for-long-term-gain-the-new-ceos-dilemma. Accessed 2020 Jul 25.

45.Whittaker M. 5 Reasons To Give Stakeholder Capitalism A Chance. FORBES. 2019 Sep 12. Available from: https://www.forbes.com/sites/martinwhittaker/2019/09/12/five-reasons-to-give-stakeholder-capitalism-a-chance/. Accessed 2020 Jul 13.

46.Business Roundtable Redefines the Purpose of a Corporation to Promote ‘An Economy That Serves All Americans’. Business Roundtable. 2019 Aug 19. Available from: https://www.businessroundtable.org/business-roundtable-redefines-the-purpose-of-a-corporation-to-promote-an-economy-that-serves-all-americans. Accessed 2020 Jul 13.

47.The Circular Design Guide. Ellen MacArthur Foundation 2017. 2018. Available from: https://www.circulardesignguide.com/. Accessed 2020 Jul 13.

48.Rinne A. 4 big trends for the sharing economy in 2019. WEF. 2019 Jan 04. Available from: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/01/sharing-economy/. Accessed 2020 Jul 19.

49.Niklas J. Sustainable Investment, what investors want. Le Temps. 2019 Mar 10. Available from: http://www.letemps.ch/economie/investissement-durable-clients-veulent. Accessed 2020 Jul 13.

50.What is ISO26000? A guidance on Social Responsibility. ASQ. Available from: https://asq.org/quality-resources/iso-26000. Accessed 2020 Jul 13.

51.Wong C. Brackley A. Petroy C. Rate the Raters - Expert Views on ESG Ratings. SustaiAbility. 2019 Feb. Available from: https://sustainability.com/our-work/reports/rate-raters-2019/. Accessed 2020 Jul 13.

52.Allen K. Lies, dammed lies, and ESG rating methodologies. Financial time. 2018 Dec 06. Available from: https://ftalphaville.ft.com/2018/12/06/1544076001000/Lies--damned-lies-and-ESG-rating-methodologies/. Accessed 2020 Jul 13.

53.Bernow S. Godsall J. Klempner B. Merten C. More than values: The value-based sustainability reporting that investors want. McKinsey. 2019 Jul. Available from: https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/Business%20Functions/Sustainability/Our%20Insights/More%20than%20values%20The%20value%20based%20sustainability%20reporting%20that%20investors%20want/More%20than%20values-VF.ashx. Accessed 2020 Jul 13.

54.Climate change has made ESG a force in investing. But the figures behind ESG rating systems are dismal. The Economist. 2019 Dec 07. Available from: https://www.economist.com/finance-and-economics/2019/12/07/climate-change-has-made-esg-a-force-in-investing. Accessed 2019 Jul 13.

55.ESG Disclosure Handbook. WBCSD. April 2019. Available from: https://docs.wbcsd.org/2019/04/ESG_Disclosure_Handbook.pdf. Accessed 2020 Jul 13.

56.GRI Standards for Sustainability Reporting. Available from: https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/gri-standards-download-center/. Accessed 2020 Jul 2013.

57.THE INTERNATIONAL FRAMEWORK. IIRC. 2013 Dec. Available from: http://integratedreporting.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/13-12-08-THE-INTERNATIONAL-IR-FRAMEWORK-2-1.pdf. Accessed 2020 Jul 13.

58.The great inaction - Why is climate change so hard to tackle? The Economist. 2018 Dec 01. Available from: https://www.economist.com/leaders/2018/12/01/why-is-climate-change-so-hard-to-tackle. Accessed 2020 Jul 13.

59.Nordhaus W. The Climate Club - How to Fix a Failing Global Effort. Foreign Affairs. 2020 May/June. Available from: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2020-04-10/climate-club. Accessed 2020 Jul 13.

60.Investopedia—What is the Prisoner's Dilemma? Available from: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/prisoners-dilemma.asp. Accessed 2020 Jul 13.

61.Kuhn S. Prisoner's Dilemma. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2019 Apr 2. Available from: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/prisoner-dilemma/. Accessed 2020 Jul 13.

62.Lundvall B‐Å. National Innovation Systems—Analytical Concept and Development Tool. Industry Innovat. 2007;14(1):95-119. doi: 10.1080/13662710601130863

63.Michael E. Porter. The Competitive Advantage of Nations. Harvard Business Review, March–April 1990 Issue. Available from: https://hbr.org/1990/03/the-competitive-advantage-of-nations. Accessed 2020 Jul 13.

64.Schrempf B, Kaplan D, Schroeder D. National, Regional, and Sectoral Systems of Innovation—An overview. Report for FP7 Project “Progress”, progressproject.eu. 2013. Available from: http://www.progressproject.eu/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Progress_D2.2_final.pdf. Accessed 2020 Jul 13.

65.Ranga M, Etzkowitz H. Triple Helix Systems: An Analytical Framework for Innovation Policy and Practice in the Knowledge Society. Industry High Educ. 2013;27:237-62. doi: 10.5367/ihe.2013.0165

引用本文

Marc Dreyer*,Joachim von Heimburg,Anne Goldberg,Monica Schofield. Designing Responsible Innovation Ecosystems for the Mobilisation of Resources from Business and Finance to Accelerate the Implementation of Sustainability. A View from Industry, Journal of Sustainability Research. 2020; 2; (4). https://doi.org/10.20900/jsr20200033.

文献评论

相关学者

相关机构