The Role of Social Reward and Corticostriatal Connectivity in Substance Use-Journal of Psychiatry and Brain Science-CSCIED科技核心评价数据库-手机版

The Role of Social Reward and Corticostriatal Connectivity in Substance Use

The Role of Social Reward and Corticostriatal Connectivity in Substance Use

ES评分 0 浏览量：687 下载量：0

DOI	10.20900/jpbs.20200024
刊名	Journal of Psychiatry and Brain Science JPBS
年，卷(期)	2020, 5(5)
作者	Daniel Sazhin,Angelique M. Frazier,Caleb R. Haynes,Camille R. Johnston,Iris Ka-Yi Chat,Jeffrey B. Dennison,Corinne P. Bart,Michael E. McCloskey,Jason M. Chein,Dominic S. Fareri,Lauren B. Alloy,Johanna M. Jarcho,David V. Smith*,
作者单位	Department of Psychology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA ; Gordon F. Derner School of Psychology, Adelphi University, Garden City, NY 11530, USA ;
Abstract	This report describes an ongoing R03 grant that explores the links between trait reward sensitivity, substance use, and neural responses to social and nonsocial reward. Although previous research has shown that trait reward sensitivity and neural responses to reward are linked to substance use, whether this relationship is impacted by how people process social stimuli remains unclear. We are investigating these questions via a neuroimaging study with college-aged participants, using individual difference measures that examine the relation between substance use, social context, and trait reward sensitivity with tasks that measure reward anticipation, strategic behavior, social reward consumption, and the influence of social context on reward processing. We predict that substance use will be tied to distinct patterns of striatal dysfunction. Specifically, reward hyposensitive individuals will exhibit blunted striatal responses to social and non-social reward and enhanced connectivity with the orbitofrontal cortex; in contrast, reward hypersensitive individuals will exhibit enhanced striatal responses to social and non-social reward and blunted connectivity with the orbitofrontal cortex. We also will examine the relation between self-reported reward sensitivity, substance use, and striatal responses to social reward and social context. We predict that individuals reporting the highest levels of substance use will show exaggerated striatal responses to social reward and social context, independent of self-reported reward sensitivity. Examining corticostriatal responses to reward processing will help characterize the relation between reward sensitivity, social context and substance use while providing a foundation for understanding risk factors and isolating neurocognitive mechanisms that may be targeted to increase the efficacy of interventions.
KeyWord	corticostriatal connectivity; neuroimaging; social reward; addiction; reward sensitivity; striatum; prospective risk
基金项目
页码	-

参考文献
相关文献

1.Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Key Substance Use and Mental Health Indicators in the United States: Results from the 2018 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Rockville (MD, US): Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2019. HHS Publication No. PEP19-5068. NSDUH Series H-54.

2.Diehl MM, Lempert KM, Parr AC, Ballard I, Steele VR, Smith DV. Toward an integrative perspective on the neural mechanisms underlying persistent maladaptive behaviors. Eur J Neurosci. 2018;48(3):1870-83.

3.Yücel M, Lubman DI. Neurocognitive and neuroimaging evidence of behavioural dysregulation in human drug addiction: implications for diagnosis, treatment and prevention. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2007;26(1):33-9.

4.Davis L, Uezato A, Newell JM, Frazier E. Major depression and comorbid substance use disorders. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2008;21(1):14-18.

5.Baskin-Sommers AR, Foti D. Abnormal reward functioning across substance use disorders and major depressive disorder: Considering reward as a transdiagnostic mechanism. Int J Psychophysiol. 2015;98(2):227-39.

6.Nusslock R, Alloy LB. Reward processing and mood-related symptoms: An RDoC and translational neuroscience perspective. J Affect Disord. 2017;216:3-16.

7.Whitton AE, Treadway MT, Pizzagalli DA. Reward processing dysfunction in major depression, bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2015;28(1):7-12.

8.Dalley JW, Robbins TW. Fractionating impulsivity: neuropsychiatric implications. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017;18(3):158-71.

9.Buckner RL, Andrews-Hanna JR, Schacter DL. The brain’s default network: anatomy, function, and relevance to disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1124:1-38.

10.Lerman C, Gu H, Loughead J, Ruparel K, Yang Y, Stein EA. Large-Scale Brain Network Coupling Predicts Acute Nicotine Abstinence Effects on Craving and Cognitive Function. JAMA Psychiatry. 2014;71(5):523.

11.Liang X, He Y, Salmeron BJ, Gu H, Stein EA, Yang Y. Interactions between the salience and default-mode networks are disrupted in cocaine addiction. J Neurosci Off J Soc Neurosci. 2015;35(21):8081-90.

12.Ma N, Liu Y, Fu X-M, Li N, Wang C-X, Zhang H, et al. Abnormal brain default-mode network functional connectivity in drug addicts. PLoS One. 2011;6(1):e16560.

13.Sutherland MT, McHugh MJ, Pariyadath V, Stein EA. Resting state functional connectivity in addiction: Lessons learned and a road ahead. NeuroImage. 2012;62(4):2281-95.

14.Chein J, Albert D, O’Brien L, Uckert K, Steinberg L. Peers increase adolescent risk taking by enhancing activity in the brain’s reward circuitry. Dev Sci. 2011;14(2):F1-10.

15.Fareri DS, Delgado MR. Social Rewards and Social Networks in the Human Brain. Neurosci Rev J Bringing Neurobiol Neurol Psychiatry. 2014;20(4):387-402.

16.Beer JS, John OP, Scabini D, Knight RT. Orbitofrontal cortex and social behavior: integrating self-monitoring and emotion-cognition interactions. J Cogn Neurosci. 2006;18(6):871-9.

17.Izuma K, Saito D, Sadato N. Processing of the Incentive for Social Approval in the Ventral Striatum during Charitable Donation. J Cogn Neurosci. 2009;22:621-31.

18.Walsh E, Carl H, Eisenlohr-Moul T, Minkel J, Crowther A, Moore T, et al. Attenuation of Frontostriatal Connectivity During Reward Processing Predicts Response to Psychotherapy in Major Depressive Disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2017;42(4):831-43.

19.Hung C-C, Zhang S, Chen C-M, Duann J-R, Lin C-P, Lee TS-H, et al. Striatal functional connectivity in chronic ketamine users: a pilot study. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2020;46(1):31-43.

20.Heilig M, Epstein DH, Nader MA, Shaham Y. Time to connect: bringing social context into addiction neuroscience. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2016;17(9):592-9.

21.Goldstein RZ, Volkow ND. Dysfunction of the prefrontal cortex in addiction: neuroimaging findings and clinical implications. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011;12(11):652-69.

22.Koob GF, Le Moal M. Drug addiction, dysregulation of reward, and allostasis. Neuropsychopharmacol Off Publ Am Coll Neuropsychopharmacol. 2001;24(2):97-129.

23.Koob GF. Addiction is a Reward Deficit and Stress Surfeit Disorder. Front Psychiatry. 2013;4:72.

24.Volkow ND, Wang G-J, Fowler JS, Tomasi D, Telang F, Baler R. Addiction: decreased reward sensitivity and increased expectation sensitivity conspire to overwhelm the brain’s control circuit. BioEssays News Rev Mol Cell Dev Biol. 2010 Sep;32(9):748-55.

25.Blum K, Braverman ER, Holder JM, Lubar JF, Monastra VJ, Miller D, et al. Reward deficiency syndrome: a biogenetic model for the diagnosis and treatment of impulsive, addictive, and compulsive behaviors. J Psychoactive Drugs. 2000;32(Suppl):i-iv, 1-112.

26.Koob GF, Volkow ND. Neurocircuitry of Addiction. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010;35(1):217-38.

27.Ersche KD, Roiser JP, Abbott S, Craig KJ, Müller U, Suckling J, et al. Response perseveration in stimulant dependence is associated with striatal dysfunction and can be ameliorated by a D(2/3) receptor agonist. Biol Psychiatry. 2011;70(8):754-62.

28.Meyer PJ, King CP, Ferrario CR. Motivational Processes Underlying Substance Abuse Disorder. Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2016;27:473-506.

29.Luijten M, Schellekens AF, Kühn S, Machielse MWJ, Sescousse G. Disruption of Reward Processing in Addiction : An Image-Based Meta-analysis of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies. JAMA Psychiatry. 2017;74(4):387-98.

30.Büchel C, Peters J, Banaschewski T, Bokde ALW, Bromberg U, Conrod PJ, et al. Blunted ventral striatal responses to anticipated rewards foreshadow problematic drug use in novelty-seeking adolescents. Nat Commun. 2017;8:14140.

31.Joyner KJ, Bowyer CB, Yancey JR, Venables NC, Foell J, Worthy DA, et al. Blunted Reward Sensitivity and Trait Disinhibition Interact to Predict Substance Use Problems. Clin Psychol Sci J Assoc Psychol Sci. 2019;7(5):1109-24.

32.Quello SB, Brady KT, Sonne SC. Mood Disorders and Substance Use Disorder: A Complex Comorbidity. Sci Pract Perspect. 2005;3(1):13-21.

33.Furman DJ, Hamilton JP, Gotlib IH. Frontostriatal functional connectivity in major depressive disorder. Biol Mood Anxiety Disord. 2011;1:11.

34.Hao ZY, Zhong Y, Ma ZJ, Xu HZ, Kong JY, Wu Z, et al. Abnormal resting-state functional connectivity of hippocampal subfields in patients with major depressive disorder. BMC Psychiatry. 2020;20(1):71.

35.Ng TH, Alloy LB, Smith DV. Meta-analysis of reward processing in major depressive disorder reveals distinct abnormalities within the reward circuit. Transl Psychiatry. 2019;9(1):1-10.

36.Kumar P, Goer F, Murray L, Dillon DG, Beltzer ML, Cohen AL, et al. Impaired reward prediction error encoding and striatal-midbrain connectivity in depression. Neuropsychopharmacol Off Publ Am Coll Neuropsychopharmacol. 2018;43(7):1581-8.

37.Liu W, Roiser JP, Wang L, Zhu Y, Huang J, Neumann DL, et al. Anhedonia is associated with blunted reward sensitivity in first-degree relatives of patients with major depression. J Affect Disord. 2016;190:640-8.

38.Gray JA. The psychophysiological basis of introversion-extraversion. Behav Res Ther. 1970;8(3):249-66.

39.Carver C, White T. Behavioral Inhibition, Behavioral Activation, and Affective Responses to Impending Reward and Punishment: The BIS/BAS Scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994;67:319-33.

40.Torrubia R, Avila C, Moltó J, Caseras X. The Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire (SPSRQ) as a measure of Gray’s Anxiety and Impulsivity dimensions. Personal Individ Differ. 2001;31:837-62.

41.Alloy LB, Abramson LY, Walshaw PD, Gerstein RK, Keyser JD, Whitehouse WG, et al. Behavioral approach system (BAS)-relevant cognitive styles and bipolar spectrum disorders: Concurrent and prospective associations. J Abnorm Psychol. 2009;118(3):459-71.

42.Martin LE, Potts GF. Reward sensitivity in impulsivity. Neuroreport. 2004;15(9):1519-22.

43.Costumero V, Barrós-Loscertales A, Bustamante JC, Ventura-Campos N, Fuentes P, Rosell-Negre P, et al. Reward Sensitivity Is Associated with Brain Activity during Erotic Stimulus Processing. PLoS One. 2013;8(6):e66940.

44.Costumero V, Barrós-Loscertales A, Fuentes P, Rosell-Negre P, Bustamante JC, Ávila C. BAS-drive trait modulates dorsomedial striatum activity during reward response-outcome associations. Brain Imaging Behav. 2016;10(3):869-79.

45.Yamamoto DJ, Banich MT, Regner MF, Sakai JT, Tanabe J. Behavioral approach and orbitofrontal cortical activity during decision-making in substance dependence. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017;180:234-40.

46.Franken IHA, Muris P. BIS/BAS personality characteristics and college students’ substance use. Personal Individ Differ. 2006;40(7):1497-503.

47.Balconi M, Finocchiaro R. Decisional impairments in cocaine addiction, reward bias, and cortical oscillation “unbalance.” Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2015;11:777-86.

48.Lawn W, Freeman TP, Hindocha C, Mokrysz C, Das RK, Morgan CJA, et al. The effects of nicotine dependence and acute abstinence on the processing of drug and non-drug rewards. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2015;232(14):2503-17.

49.Genovese JEC, Wallace D. Reward sensitivity and substance abuse in middle school and high school students. J Genet Psychol Res Theory Hum Dev. 2007;168(4):465-9.

50.Marlatt GA, Donovan DM. Relapse prevention: Maintenance strategies in the treatment of addictive behaviors. 2nd ed. New York (NY, US): The Guilford Press; 2005. p. xiv, 416.

51.Oh H, Lee J, Gosnell SN, Patriquin M, Kosten T, Salas R. Orbitofrontal, dorsal striatum, and habenula functional connectivity in psychiatric patients with substance use problems. Addict Behav. 2020;108:106457.

52.Tricomi E, Rangel A, Camerer CF, O’Doherty JP. Neural evidence for inequality-averse social preferences. Nature. 2010;463(7284):1089-91.

53.Bault N, Joffily M, Rustichini A, Coricelli G. Medial prefrontal cortex and striatum mediate the influence of social comparison on the decision process. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2011;108(38):16044-9.

54.Fliessbach K, Weber B, Trautner P, Dohmen T, Sunde U, Elger C, et al. Social Comparison Affects Reward-Related Brain Activity in the Human Ventral Striatum. Science. 2007 Dec 1;318:1305-8.

55.Báez-Mendoza R, Schultz W. The role of the striatum in social behavior. Front Neurosci. 2013;7:233.

56.Tamir DI, Mitchell JP. Disclosing information about the self is intrinsically rewarding. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2012;109(21):8038-43.

57.Fareri DS, Chang LJ, Delgado MR. Computational Substrates of Social Value in Interpersonal Collaboration. J Neurosci. 2015;35(21):8170-80.

58.Simon D, Becker MPI, Mothes-Lasch M, Miltner WHR, Straube T. Effects of social context on feedback-related activity in the human ventral striatum. NeuroImage. 2014;99:1-6.

59.Behrens TEJ, Hunt LT, Rushworth MFS. The computation of social behavior. Science. 2009;324(5931):1160-4.

60.Saxe R. Uniquely human social cognition. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2006;16(2):235-9.

61.Mars RB, Neubert F-X, Noonan MP, Sallet J, Toni I, Rushworth MFS. On the relationship between the “default mode network” and the “social brain”. Front Hum Neurosci. 2012;6:189.

62.Fareri D, Niznikiewicz M, Lee V, Delgado M. Social Network Modulation of Reward-Related Signals. J Neurosci Off J Soc Neurosci. 2012;32:9045-52.

63.Smith AR, Steinberg L, Strang N, Chein J. Age differences in the impact of peers on adolescents’ and adults’ neural response to reward. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2015;11:75-82.

64.O’Brien L, Albert D, Chein J, Steinberg L. Adolescents Prefer More Immediate Rewards When in the Presence of their Peers. J Res Adolesc. 2011;21(4):747-53.

65.Distefano A, Jackson F, Levinson AR, Infantolino ZP, Jarcho JM, Nelson BD. A comparison of the electrocortical response to monetary and social reward. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2018;13(3):247-55.

66.Wake SJ, Izuma K. A common neural code for social and monetary rewards in the human striatum. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2017;12(10):1558-64.

67.Smith DV, Clithero JA, Boltuck SE, Huettel SA. Functional connectivity with ventromedial prefrontal cortex reflects subjective value for social rewards. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014;9(12):2017-25.

68.van den Bos W, Vahl P, Güroğlu B, van Nunspeet F, Colins O, Markus M, et al. Neural correlates of social decision-making in severely antisocial adolescents. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014;9(12):2059-66.

69.Volkow ND, Baler RD, Goldstein RZ. Addiction: Pulling at the Neural Threads of Social Behaviors. Neuron. 2011;69(4):599-602.

70.Côté S, Decelles K, Mccarthy J, van Kleef G, Hideg I. The Jekyll and Hyde of Emotional Intelligence Emotion-Regulation Knowledge Facilitates Both Prosocial and Interpersonally Deviant Behavior. Psychol Sci. 2011;22:1073-80.

71.Nozaki Y, Koyasu M. The Relationship between Trait Emotional Intelligence and Interaction with Ostracized Others’ Retaliation. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e77579.

72.Scheres A, Sanfey A. Individual differences in decision making: Drive and Reward Responsiveness affect strategic bargaining in economic games. Behav Brain Funct. 2006;2:35.

73.De Neys W, Novitskiy N, Geeraerts L, Ramautar J, Wagemans J. Cognitive Control and Individual Differences in Economic Ultimatum Decision-Making. PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e27107.

74.Spitzer M, Fischbacher U, Herrnberger B, Grön G, Fehr E. The neural signature of social norm compliance. Neuron. 2007;56(1):185-96.

75.Delgado MR, Nystrom LE, Fissell C, Noll DC, Fiez JA. Tracking the hemodynamic responses to reward and punishment in the striatum. J Neurophysiol. 2000;84(6):3072-7.

76.Knutson B, Westdorp A, Kaiser E, Hommer D. FMRI visualization of brain activity during a monetary incentive delay task. NeuroImage. 2000;12(1):20-7.

77.Quarmley ME, Nelson BD, Clarkson T, White LK, Jarcho JM. I Knew You Weren’t Going to Like Me! Neural Response to Accurately Predicting Rejection Is Associated With Anxiety and Depression. Front Behav Neurosci. 2019;13:219.

78.Smith DV, Gseir M, Speer ME, Delgado MR. Toward a cumulative science of functional integration: A meta-analysis of psychophysiological interactions. Hum Brain Mapp. 2016;37(8):2904-17.

79.Smith DV, Rigney AE, Delgado MR. Distinct Reward Properties are Encoded via Corticostriatal Interactions. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):1-12.

80.McCloskey MS, Berman ME. Alcohol intoxication and self-aggressive behavior. J Abnorm Psychol. 2003;112(2):306-11.

81.McNutt MK, Bradford M, Drazen JM, Hanson B, Howard B, Jamieson KH, et al. Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2018;115(11):2557-60.

82.Strange K. Authorship: why not just toss a coin? Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2008;295(3):C567-75.

83.Gorgolewski KJ, Varoquaux G, Rivera G, Schwarz Y, Ghosh SS, Maumet C, et al. NeuroVault.org: a web-based repository for collecting and sharing unthresholded statistical maps of the human brain. Front Neuroinformatics. 2015;9:8.

84.Alloy LB, Abramson LY, Walshaw PD, Cogswell A, Smith JM, Neeren AM, et al. Behavioral Approach System (BAS) Sensitivity and Bipolar Spectrum Disorders: A Retrospective and Concurrent Behavioral High-Risk Design. Motiv Emot. 2006;30(2):143-55.

85.Alloy LB, Bender RE, Whitehouse WG, Wagner CA, Liu RT, Grant DA, et al. High Behavioral Approach System (BAS) sensitivity, reward responsiveness, and goal-striving predict first onset of bipolar spectrum disorders: A prospective behavioral high-risk design. J Abnorm Psychol. 2012;121(2):339-51.

86.Liu RT, Burke TA, Abramson LY, Alloy LB. The Behavioral Approach System (BAS) Model of Vulnerability to Bipolar Disorder: Evidence of a Continuum in BAS Sensitivity across Adolescence. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2018;46(6):1333-49.

87.Spitzer RL, Endicott J, Robins E. Research diagnostic criteria: rationale and reliability. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1978;35(6):773-82.

88.First MB. Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM (SCID). In: The Encyclopedia of Clinical Psychology. Atlanta (US): American Cancer Society; 2015; p. 1-6.

89.Beck AT, Steer RA, Ball R, Ranieri W. Comparison of Beck Depression Inventories -IA and -II in psychiatric outpatients. J Pers Assess. 1996;67(3):588-97.

90.Youngstrom EA, Murray G, Johnson SL, Findling RL. The 7 Up 7 Down Inventory: A 14-item measure of manic and depressive tendencies carved from the General Behavior Inventory. Psychol Assess. 2013;25(4):1377-83.

91.Altman EG, Hedeker D, Peterson JL, Davis JM. The Altman Self-Rating Mania Scale. Biol Psychiatry. 1997;42(10):948-55.

92.Ehrman RN, Robbins SJ. Reliability and validity of 6-month timeline reports of cocaine and heroin use in a methadone population. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1994;62(4):843-50.

93.Sobell MB, Sobell LC, Klajner F, Pavan D, Basian E. The reliability of a timeline method for assessing normal drinker college students’ recent drinking history: utility for alcohol research. Addict Behav. 1986;11(2):149-61.

94.Berman AH, Bergman H, Palmstierna T, Schlyter F. Evaluation of the Drug Use Disorders Identification Test (DUDIT) in criminal justice and detoxification settings and in a Swedish population sample. Eur Addict Res. 2005;11(1):22-31.

95.Moberg D, Hahn L. The adolescent drug involvement scale. J Child Adolesc Subst Abuse. 1991;2:75-88.

96.Moberg DP. The Adolescent Alcohol and Drug Involvement Scale: An instrument for measuring adolescent use and misuse of alcohol. J Stud Alcohol. 2000;(40):291-300.

97.Baron-Cohen S, Wheelwright S, Skinner R, Martin J, Clubley E. The autism-spectrum quotient (AQ): evidence from Asperger syndrome/high-functioning autism, males and females, scientists and mathematicians. J Autism Dev Disord. 2001;31(1):5-17.

98.Davis MH. Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1983;44(1):113-26.

99.Petrides KV. Psychometric properties of the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire (TEIQue). In: Assessing emotional intelligence: Theory, research, and applications. New York (NY, US): Springer Science + Business Media; 2009. p. 85-101.

100.Cooper ML. Motivations for alcohol use among adolescents: Development and validation of a four-factor model. Psychol Assess. 1994;6(2):117-28.

101.Simons J, Correia CJ, Carey KB. A comparison of motives for marijuana and alcohol use among experienced users. Addict Behav. 2000;25(1):153-60.

102.Simons JS, Gaher RM. The Distress Tolerance Scale: Development and Validation of a Self-Report Measure. Motiv Emot. 2005;29(2):83-102.

103.Esteban O, Markiewicz CJ, Blair RW, Moodie CA, Isik AI, Erramuzpe A, et al. fMRIPrep: a robust preprocessing pipeline for functional MRI. Nat Methods. 2019;16(1):111-6.

104.Gorgolewski K, Burns CD, Madison C, Clark D, Halchenko YO, Waskom ML, et al. Nipype: a flexible, lightweight and extensible neuroimaging data processing framework in python. Front Neuroinformatics. 2011;5:13.

105.Gorgolewski KJ, Esteban O, Ellis DG, Notter MP, Ziegler E, Johnson H, et al. Nipype: a flexible, lightweight and extensible neuroimaging data processing framework in Python. 0.13.1. Available from: https://zenodo.org/record/581704. Accessed 2020 Oct 28.

106.Tustison NJ, Avants BB, Cook PA, Zheng Y, Egan A, Yushkevich PA, et al. N4ITK: improved N3 bias correction. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2010;29(6):1310-20.

107.Avants BB, Epstein CL, Grossman M, Gee JC. Symmetric diffeomorphic image registration with cross-correlation: Evaluating automated labeling of elderly and neurodegenerative brain. Med Image Anal. 2008;12(1):26-41.

108.Zhang Y, Brady M, Smith S. Segmentation of brain MR images through a hidden Markov random field model and the expectation-maximization algorithm. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2001;20(1):45-57.

109.Fonov V, Evans A, McKinstry R, Almli C, Collins D. Unbiased nonlinear average age-appropriate brain templates from birth to adulthood. NeuroImage. 2009;47:S102.

110.Evans AC, Janke AL, Collins DL, Baillet S. Brain templates and atlases. NeuroImage. 2012;62(2):911-22.

111.Glasser MF, Sotiropoulos SN, Wilson JA, Coalson TS, Fischl B, Andersson JL, et al. The minimal preprocessing pipelines for the Human Connectome Project. NeuroImage. 2013;80:105-24.

112.Jenkinson M, Bannister P, Brady M, Smith S. Improved Optimization for the Robust and Accurate Linear Registration and Motion Correction of Brain Images. NeuroImage. 2002;17(2):825-41.

113.Greve DN, Fischl B. Accurate and robust brain image alignment using boundary-based registration. NeuroImage. 2009;48(1):63-72.

114.Cox RW, Hyde JS. Software tools for analysis and visualization of fMRI data. NMR Biomed. 1997;10(4-5):171-8.

115.Pruim RHR, Mennes M, Buitelaar JK, Beckmann CF. Evaluation of ICA-AROMA and alternative strategies for motion artifact removal in resting state fMRI. NeuroImage. 2015;112:278-87.

116.Power JD, Schlaggar BL, Petersen SE. Recent progress and outstanding issues in motion correction in resting state fMRI. NeuroImage. 2015;0:536-51.

117.Lanczos C. Evaluation of Noisy Data. J Soc Ind Appl Math Ser B Numer Anal. 1964;1(1):76-85.

118.Abraham A, Pedregosa F, Eickenberg M, Gervais P, Mueller A, Kossaifi J, et al. Machine learning for neuroimaging with scikit-learn. Front Neuroinformatics. 2014;8:14.

119.Smith S, Jenkinson M, Woolrich M, Beckmann C, Behrens T, Johansen-Berg H, et al. Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. NeuroImage. 2004;23(Suppl 1):S208-19.

120.Woolrich MW, Ripley BD, Brady M, Smith SM. Temporal autocorrelation in univariate linear modeling of FMRI data. NeuroImage. 2001;14(6):1370-86.

121.Friston KJ, Buechel C, Fink GR, Morris J, Rolls E, Dolan RJ. Psychophysiological and modulatory interactions in neuroimaging. NeuroImage. 1997;6(3):218-29.

122.Friston KJ. Functional and effective connectivity: a review. Brain Connect. 2011;1(1):13-36.

123.Smith DV, Delgado MR. Meta-analysis of psychophysiological interactions: Revisiting cluster-level thresholding and sample sizes. Hum Brain Mapp. 2017;38(1):588-91.

124.Tziortzi AC, Searle GE, Tzimopoulou S, Salinas C, Beaver JD, Jenkinson M, et al. Imaging dopamine receptors in humans with
[11C]-(+)-PHNO: Dissection of D3 signal and anatomy. NeuroImage. 2011;54(1):264-77.

125.O’Reilly JX, Woolrich MW, Behrens TEJ, Smith SM, Johansen-Berg H. Tools of the trade: psychophysiological interactions and functional connectivity. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2012;7(5):604-9.

126.Fareri DS, Smith DV, Delgado MR. The influence of relationship closeness on default-mode network connectivity during social interactions. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2020;15(3):261-71.

127.Utevsky AV, Smith DV, Young JS, Huettel SA. Large-Scale Network Coupling with the Fusiform Cortex Facilitates Future Social Motivation. eNeuro. 2017;4(5):ENEURO.0084-17.2017.

128.Nickerson LD, Smith SM, Öngür D, Beckmann CF. Using Dual Regression to Investigate Network Shape and Amplitude in Functional Connectivity Analyses. Front Neurosci. 2017;11:115.

129.Filippini N, MacIntosh BJ, Hough MG, Goodwin GM, Frisoni GB, Smith SM, et al. Distinct patterns of brain activity in young carriers of the APOE-ε4 allele. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(17):7209-14.

130.Woolrich MW, Behrens TEJ, Beckmann CF, Jenkinson M, Smith SM. Multilevel linear modelling for FMRI group analysis using Bayesian inference. NeuroImage. 2004;21(4):1732-47.

131.Smith DV, Utevsky AV, Bland AR, Clement N, Clithero JA, Harsch AEW, et al. Characterizing Individual Differences in Functional Connectivity Using Dual-Regression and Seed-Based Approaches. NeuroImage. 2014;95:1-12.

132.Tepfer L, Alloy L, Smith D. Family History of Depression is Associated with Alterations in Task-Dependent Connectivity between the Cerebellum and Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex. bioRxiv 851477
[Preprint]. 2019 Nov 21. https://doi.org/10.1101/851477

133.Eklund A, Nichols TE, Knutsson H. Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 12;113(28):7900-5.

134.Woo C-W, Krishnan A, Wager TD. Cluster-extent based thresholding in fMRI analyses: pitfalls and recommendations. NeuroImage. 2014;91:412-9.

135.Smith SM, Nichols TE. Threshold-free cluster enhancement: addressing problems of smoothing, threshold dependence and localisation in cluster inference. NeuroImage. 2009;44(1):83-98.

136.Knutson B, Fong GW, Adams CM, Varner JL, Hommer D. Dissociation of reward anticipation and outcome with event-related fMRI. NeuroReport. 2001;12(17):3683-7.

137.Clithero JA, Reeck C, Carter RM, Smith DV, Huettel SA. Nucleus Accumbens Mediates Relative Motivation for Rewards in the Absence of Choice. Front Hum Neurosci. 2011;5:87.

138.Proudfit GH. The reward positivity: From basic research on reward to a biomarker for depression. Psychophysiology. 2015;52(4):449-59.

139.Cabeza R, Ciaramelli E, Moscovitch M. Cognitive contributions of the ventral parietal cortex: an integrative theoretical account. Trends Cogn Sci. 2012;16(6):338-52.

140.Carter RM, Huettel SA. A nexus model of the temporal-parietal junction. Trends Cogn Sci. 2013;17(7):328-36.

141.Kahnt T, Tobler PN. Salience Signals in the Right Temporoparietal Junction Facilitate Value-Based Decisions. J Neurosci. 2013;33(3):863-9.

142.Tusche A, Böckler A, Kanske P, Trautwein F-M, Singer T. Decoding the Charitable Brain: Empathy, Perspective Taking, and Attention Shifts Differentially Predict Altruistic Giving. J Neurosci Off J Soc Neurosci. 2016 27;36(17):4719-32.

143.Behrens TEJ, Hunt LT, Woolrich MW, Rushworth MFS. Associative learning of social value. Nature. 2008;456(7219):245-9.

144.Güth W, Schmittberger R, Schwarze B. An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. J Econ Behav Organ. 1982;3(4):367-88.

145.Kahneman D, Knetsch JL, Thaler RH. Fairness and the Assumptions of Economics. J Bus. 1986;59(S4):S285.

146.Valls-Serrano C, Verdejo-García A, Caracuel A. Planning deficits in polysubstance dependent users: Differential associations with severity of drug use and intelligence. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016;162:72-8.

147.Perkins KA, Karelitz JL, Boldry MC. Nicotine Acutely Enhances Reinforcement from Non-Drug Rewards in Humans. Front Psychiatry. 2017;8:65.

148.Xu X, Clark US, David SP, Mulligan RC, Knopik VS, McGeary J, et al. Effects of Nicotine Deprivation and Replacement on BOLD-fMRI Response to Smoking Cues as a Function of DRD4 VNTR Genotype. Nicotine Tob Res. 2014;16(7):939-47.

149.Genevsky A, Knutson B. Neural Affective Mechanisms Predict Market-Level Microlending. Psychol Sci. 2015;26(9):1411-22.

150.Knutson B, Genevsky A. Neuroforecasting Aggregate Choice. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2018;27(2):110-115. doi: 10.1177/0963721417737877

151.MacNiven KH, Jensen ELS, Borg N, Padula CB, Humphreys K, Knutson B. Association of Neural Responses to Drug Cues With Subsequent Relapse to Stimulant Use. JAMA Netw Open. 2018;1(8): e186466.

152.Kearney-Ramos TE, Dowdle LT, Lench DH, Mithoefer OJ, Devries WH, George MS, et al. Transdiagnostic Effects of Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Cue Reactivity. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2018;3(7):599-609.

153.Rose JE, McClernon FJ, Froeliger B, Behm FM, Preud’homme X, Krystal AD. Repetitive transcraniamagnetic stimulation of the superior frontal gyrus modulates craving for cigarettes. Biol Psychiatry. 2011;70(8):794-9.

引用本文

Daniel Sazhin,Angelique M. Frazier,Caleb R. Haynes,Camille R. Johnston,Iris Ka-Yi Chat,Jeffrey B. Dennison,Corinne P. Bart,Michael E. McCloskey,Jason M. Chein,Dominic S. Fareri,Lauren B. Alloy,Johanna M. Jarcho,David V. Smith*. The Role of Social Reward and Corticostriatal Connectivity in Substance Use, Journal of Psychiatry and Brain Science. 2020; 5; (5). https://doi.org/10.20900/jpbs.20200024.

文献评论

相关学者

相关机构