The Effect of Employee Proactive Personality and Felt Responsibility on Individual Corporate Social Responsibility Behaviors: The CSR Context Matters-Journal of Sustainability Research-CSCIED科技核心评价数据库-手机版

The Effect of Employee Proactive Personality and Felt Responsibility on Individual Corporate Social Responsibility Behaviors: The CSR Context Matters

The Effect of Employee Proactive Personality and Felt Responsibility on Individual Corporate Social Responsibility Behaviors: The CSR Context Matters

ES评分 0 浏览量：987 下载量：0

全文阅读下载引用收藏

DOI	10.20900/jsr20210002
刊名	Journal of Sustainability Research JSR
年，卷(期)	2021, 3(1)
作者	Drew B. Mallory,Deborah E. Rupp*,Niti Pandey,Louis Tay,
作者单位	Sasin School of Management, Sasa Pathasala, 254 Wang Mai, Pathum Wan District, Bangkok 10330, Thailand ; Department of Psychology, George Mason University, 4400 University Drive, 3F5, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA ; Department of Management and Marketing, Eastern Connecticut State University, 83 Windham St, Willimantic, CT 06226, USA ; Department of Psychology, Purdue University, 703 Third Street, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA ;
Abstract	This research explores the antecedents and consequences of felt responsibility for constructive change within the context of corporate social responsibility (CSR). A moderated mediation model is proposed wherein proactive personality predicts felt responsibility, which in turn influences three types of individual-level socially responsible behaviors both within and beyond organizational boundaries (i.e., socially responsible behaviors in the workplace, (refraining from) counterproductive work behaviors, and socially responsible behaviors outside the workplace). Perceptions of CSR were predicted to place a situational boundary condition on the effects of felt responsibility. Predictions tested on an employee sample showed that proactive personality drives socially responsible behaviors via felt responsibility, but that when individuals perceive a high level of CSR, the predictive power of felt responsibility is diminished (illustrating the potential power of socially responsible workplace environments). The findings suggest that internal CSR communication strategies may play an important role in encouraging prosocial behaviors of even those employees less predisposed to be socially responsible.
KeyWord	corporate social responsibility; CSR; micro-CSR; prosocial personality; felt responsibility; counterproductive work behaviors; citizenship behavior
基金项目
页码	-

参考文献
相关文献

1.Aguilera RV, Rupp DE, Williams CA, Ganapathi J. Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Acad Manag Rev. 2007;32(3):836-63.

2.Davis K. The case for and against business assumption of social responsibilities. Acad Manag J. 1973;16(2):312-22.

3.Glavas A. Corporate social responsibility and organizational psychology: An integrative review. Front Psychol. 2016;7(144):1-13.

4.Jones DA, Rupp DE. Social responsibility IN and OF organizations: The psychology of corporate social responsibility among organizational members. In: Ones DS, Anderson N, Viswesvaran C, Sinangil HK, editors. The handbook of industrial, work and organizational psychology. London (UK): Sage; 2018. p. 333-50.

5.McWilliams A, Rupp DE, Seigel DS, Stahl G, Waldman DA. New developments in the study of corporate social responsibility. In: McWilliams A, Rupp DE, Seigel DS, Stahl G, Waldman DA, editors. The oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility: psychological and organizational perspectives. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press; 2019.

6.Willness C, Strah N, Rupp DE, Jones DA. Corporate social responsibility at the individual level of analysis: Research findings that inform responsible management “in the wild”. In: Laasch O, Jamali OD, Freeman E, Suddaby R, editors. Research handbook of responsible management. Cheltenham (UK): Edward Elgar; 2020.

7.Rupp DE, Mallory DB. Corporate social responsibility: Psychological, person-centric, and progressing. Annu Rev Organ Psychol Organ Behav. 2015;2(1):211-36.

8.Crilly D, Schneider SC, Zollo M. Psychological antecedents to socially responsible behavior. Eur Manag Rev. 2008;5(3):175-90.

9.Ones DS, Dilchert S. Employee green behaviors. In: Jackson SE, Ones DS, Dilchert S, editors. Managing human resources for environmental sustainability. Hoboken (NJ, US): John Wiley & Sons; 2012. p. 85-116.

10.Gond J-P, El Akremi A, Swaen V, Babu N. The psychological microfoundations of corporate social responsibility: A person-centric systematic review. J Organ Behav. 2017;246(2):225-46.

11.Blok V, Wesselink R, Studynka O, Kemp R. Encouraging sustainability in the workplace: A survey on the proenvironmental behavior of university employees. J Clean Prod. 2015;106:55-67.

12.Lamm E, Tosti-Kharas J, King C. Empowering employee sustainability: Perceived organisational support toward the environment. J Bus Ethics. 2015;128:207-20.

13.Bateman TS, Crant JM. The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates. J Organ Behav. 1993;14(2):103-18.

14.Fuller JB, Marler LE, Hester K. Promoting felt responsibility for constructive change and proactive behavior: Exploring aspects of an elaborated model of work design. J Organ Behav. 2006;27(8):1089-120.

15.Morrison EW, Phelps CC. Taking charge at work: Extrarole efforts to initiate workplace change. Acad Manag J. 1999;42(4):403-19.

16.Bandura A. A social cognitive theory of personality. In: Pervin L, John O, editors. Handbook of personality. 2nd ed. New York (NY, US): Guilford Publications; 1999. p. 154-96.

17.Li N, Liang J, Crant JM. The role of proactive personality in job satisfaction and organizational citizenship behavior: A relational perspective. J Appl Psychol. 2010;95(2):395-404.

18.Tett RP, Burnett DD. A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. J Appl Psychol. 2003;88(3):500-17.

19.Fuller JB, Marler LE. Change driven by nature: A meta-analytic review of the proactive personality literature. J Vocat Behav. 2009;75(3):329-45.

20.Parker SK, Williams HM, Turner N. Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. J Appl Psychol. 2006;91(3):636-52.

21.Weiss HM, Rupp DE. Envisioning a person-centric work psychology. Ind Organ Psychol. 2011;4(1):138-43.

22.Rank J, Pace VL, Frese M. Three avenues for future research on creativity, innovation, and initiative. Appl Psychol. 2004;53:518-28.

23.Bolino MC, Grant AM. The bright side of being prosocial at work, and the dark side, too: A review and agenda for research on other-oriented motives, behavior, and impact in organizations. Acad Manag Ann. 2016;10(1):599-670.

24.Smith CA, Organ DW, Near JP. Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. J Appl Psychol. 1983;68(4):653-63.

25.Seibert SE, Kraimer ML, Crant JM. What do proactive people do? A longitudinal model linking proactive personality and career success. Pers Psychol. 2001;54(4):845-74.

26.Fay D, Sonnentag S. A look back to move ahead: New directions for research on proactive performance and other discretionary work behaviours. Appl Psychol. 2010;59(1):1-20.

27.Campbell DJ. The proactive employee: Managing workplace initiative. Acad Manag Perspect. 2000;14:52-66.

28.Parker SK, Collins CG. Taking stock: Integrating and differentiating multiple proactive behaviors. J Manage. 2010;36(3):633-62.

29.Altman BW, Vidaver-Cohen D. A framework for understanding corporate citizenship: Introduction to the special edition of Business and Society Review ‘Corporate Citizenship for the New Millennium’. Bus Society Rev. 2000;105:1-7.

30.Sethi SP. Standards for corporate conduct in the international arena: Challenges and opportunities for multinational corporations. Bus Society Rev. 2002;107:20-40.

31.Tornau K, Frese M. Construct clean-up in proactivity research: A meta-analysis on the nomological net of work-related proactivity concepts and their incremental validities. Appl Psychol. 2013;62(1):44-96.

32.Berkowitz L. Responsibility, reciprocity, and social distance in help-giving: An experimental investigation of english social class differences. J Exp Soc Psychol. 1968;4(1):46-63.

33.Berkowitz L, Friedman P. Some social class differences in helping behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1967;5(2):217-25.

34.Darley JM, Latané B. Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1968;8(4, Pt.1):377-83.

35.Tilker HA. Socially responsible behavior as a function of observer responsibility and victim feedback. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1970;14(2):95-100.

36.Schwartz SH. Normative explanations of helping behavior: A critique, proposal, and empirical test. J Exp Soc Psychol. 1973;9(4):349-64.

37.Mayer FS, Duval S, Holtz R, Bowman C. Self-focus, helping request salience, felt responsibility, and helping behavior. Personal Soc Psychol Bull. 1985;11(2):133-44.

38.Goranson RE, Berkowitz L. Reciprocity and responsibility reactions to prior help. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1966;3:227-32.

39.Hackman JR, Oldham GR. Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Org Behav Human Perf. 1976;16(2):250-79.

40.Frese M, Kring W, Soose A, Zempel J. Personal initiative at work: Differences between East and West Germany. Acad Manag J. 1996;39(1):37-63.

41.Cantor N. From thought to behavior: “Having” and “doing” in the study of personality and cognition. Am Psychol. 1990;45(6):735-50.

42.Dilchert S, Ones DS. Measuring and improving environmental sustainability. In: Jackson SE, Ones DS, Dilchert S, editors. Managing human resources for environmental sustainability. Hoboken (NJ, US): John Wiley & Sons; 2012. p. 187-221.

43.Carroll AB. Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Bus Soc. 1999;38(3):268-95.

44.Valor C. Corporate social responsibility and corporate citizenship: Towards corporate accountability. Bus Society Rev. 2005;110(2):191-212.

45.Organ DW. Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, (MA, US): Lexington Books/D. C. Heath and Com; 1988.

46.Podsakoff NP, Whiting SW, Podsakoff PM, Blume BD. Individual- and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol. 2009;94(1):122-41.

47.Pearce JL, Gregersen HB. Task interdependence and extrarole behavior: A test of the mediating effects of felt responsibility. J Appl Psychol. 1991;76(6):838-44.

48.Choi JN. Change-oriented organizational citizenship behavior: Effects of work environment characteristics and intervening psychological processes. J Organ Behav. 2007;28(4):467-84.

49.Boiral O. Greening the corporation through organizational citizenship behaviors. J Bus Ethics. 2008;87:221-36.

50.Kaiser FG. A general measure of ecological behavior. J Appl Soc Psychol. 1998;28(5):395-422.

51.Sackett PR. The structure of counterproductive work behaviors: Dimensionality and relationships with facets of job performance. Int J Sel Assess. 2002;10(1&2):5-11.

52.Graham JW. Principled organizational dissent: A theoretical essay. Res Org Behav. 1986;8:1-52.

53.Frese M, Fay D, Hilburger T, Leng K, Tag A. The concept of personal initiative: Operationalization, reliability and validity in two German samples. J Occup Organ Psychol. 1997;70(2):139-61.

54.Warren DE. Constructive and destructive deviance in organizations. Acad Manag Rev. 2003;28(4):622-32.

55.Morrison EW. Doing the job well: An Investigation of pro-social rule breaking. J Manag. 2006;32(1):5-28.

56.Sackett PR, Berry CM, Wiemann SA, Laczo RM. Citizenship and counterproductive behavior: Clarifying relations between the two domains. Human Perf. 2006;19(4):441-64.

57.Hoon H, Tan TML. Organizational citizenship behavior and social loafing: The role of personality motives, and contextual factors. J Psychol: Interdiscip Appl. 2008; 142(1):89-108.

58.Tett RP, Guterman HA. Situation trait relevance, trait expression, and cross-situational consistency: Testing a principle of trait activation. J Res Pers. 2000;34(4):397-423.

59.Mischel W. Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality. Psychol Rev. 1973;80(4):252–83.

60.Meyer RD, Dalal RS, José IJ, Hermida R, Chen TR, Vega RP, et al. Measuring job-related situational strength and assessing its interactive effects with personality on voluntary work behavior. J Manage. 2014;40(4):1010-41.

61.Nye M, Hargreaves T. Exploring the social dynamics of proenvironmental behavior change. J Ind Ecol. 2010;14:137-49.

62.Mischel W, Shoda Y. A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychol Rev. 1995;102(2):246-68.

63.Dubois CLZ, Astakhova MN, DuBois DA. Motivating behavior change to support organizational environmental sustainability goals. In: Huffman AH, Klein SR, editors. Green organizations: Driving change with I-O psychology. New York (NY, US): Routledge; 2013. p. 186-207.

64.Hayes AF. PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling
[white paper]. 2012. Available from: http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf. Accessed 2019 Dec 1.

65.Preacher KJ, Rucker DD, Hayes AF. Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivar Behav Res. 2007;42(1):185-27.

66.Jones DA, Willness CR, Madey S. Why are job seekers attracted by corporate social performance? Experimental and field tests of three signal-based mechanisms. Acad Manag J. 2014;57(2):383-404.

67.Skarlicki DP, Folger R. Retaliation in the workplace: The roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. J Appl Psychol. 1997;82(3):434–43.

68.Bandalos DL, Finney SJ. Item parceling issues in structural equation modeling. In: Marcoulides G, Schumacker R, Sterba SK, MacCallum RC, editors. New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling. Mahwah (NJ, US): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc; 2001. p. 1-354.

69.Sterba SK, MacCallum RC. Variability in parameter estimates and model fit across repeated allocations of items to parcels. Multivar Behav Res. 2010;45(2):322-58.

70.Kline R. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 2nd ed. New York (NY, US): Guilford Publications; 2005.

71.Nunnaly JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric theory. 3rd ed. New York (NY, US): McGraw-Hill; 1994. Vol. 3.

72.Belsley D, Kuh E, Welsch R. Detecting and assessing collinearity. In: Regression diagnostics: Identifying influential data and sources of collinearity. Hoboken (NJ, US): John Wiley & Sons; 1980. p. 85-91.

73.Aiken LS, West SG. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park (CA, US): Sage; 1991.

74.Edwards JR, Lambert LS. Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychol Methods. 2007;12(1):1-22.

75.Guo J, Rupp DE, Weiss HM, Trougakos JP. Justice in organizations: A person-centric perspective. In: Gilliland SW, Steiner DD, Skarlicki DP, editors. Emerging perspectives on organizational justice and ethics. Greenwich (CT, US): Information Age; 2011. p. 3-32.

76.Bhattacharya CB, Sen S, Korschun D. Using corporate social responsibility to win the war for talent. MIT Sloan Manag Rev. 2008;49:37-44.

77.Mallory DB, Rupp DE. “Good” leadership: Using corporate social responsibility to enhance leader-member exchange. In: Bauer TN, Erdogan B, editors. The oxford handbook of leader member exchange: 1–20. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press; 2014.

78.McShane L, Cunningham PH. To thine own self be true? Employees’ judgments of the authenticity of their organization’s corporate social responsibility program. J Bus Ethics. 2012;108(1):81-100.

79.Rupp DE, Shao R, Thornton MA, Skarlicki DP. Applicants’ and employees’ reactions to corporate social responsibility: The moderating effects of first-party justice perceptions and moral identity. Pers Psychol. 2013;66(4):895-933.

80.Murphy KR. Honesty in the workplace. Pacific Grove, (CA, US): Brooks/Cole; 1993.

81.LeBlanc MM, Kelloway EK. Predictors and outcomes of workplace violence and aggression. J Appl Psychol. 2002;87(3):444-53.

82.O’Leary-Kelly AM, Griffin RW, Glew DJ. Organization-motivated aggression: A research framework. Acad Manag Rev. 1996;21(1):225-53.

83.Schmitt N. Method bias: The importance of theory and measurement. J Organ Behav. 1994;15(5):393-8.

84.Pratt MG. Identities in organizations: Building theory through conversations. Whetten DA, Godfrey PC, editors. Thousand Oaks (CA, US): SAGE Publications, Inc.; 1998.

85.Van Dyne L, Vandewalle D, Kostova T, Latham ME, Cummings LL. Collectivism, propensity to trust and self-esteem as predictors of organizational citizenship in a non-work setting. J Organ Behav. 2000;21(1):3-23.

86.Williams S, Shiaw W. Mood and organizational citizenship behavior: The effects of positive affect on employee organizational citizenship behavior intentions. J Psychol. 1999;133(6):656-68.

87.Spector PE. Method variance in organizational research: Truth or urban legend? Organ Res Methods. 2006;9(2):221-32.

88.Chung J, Monroe GS. Exploring social desirability bias. J Bus Ethics. 2003;44(4):291-302.

89.Spector PE, Fox S, Penney LM, Bruursema K, Goh A, Kessler S. The dimensionality of counterproductivity: Are all counterproductive behaviors created equal? J Vocat Behav. 2006;68(3):446-60.

引用本文

Drew B. Mallory,Deborah E. Rupp*,Niti Pandey,Louis Tay. The Effect of Employee Proactive Personality and Felt Responsibility on Individual Corporate Social Responsibility Behaviors: The CSR Context Matters, Journal of Sustainability Research. 2021; 3; (1). https://doi.org/10.20900/jsr20210002.

文献评论

相关学者

相关机构