Implementation of Genomic Selection in the CIMMYT Global Wheat Program, Findings from the Past 10 Years-Crop Breeding, Genetics and Genomics-CSCIED科技核心评价数据库-手机版

Implementation of Genomic Selection in the CIMMYT Global Wheat Program, Findings from the Past 10 Years

Implementation of Genomic Selection in the CIMMYT Global Wheat Program, Findings from the Past 10 Years

ES评分 0 浏览量：1030 下载量：0

DOI	10.20900/cbgg20210005
刊名	Crop Breeding, Genetics and Genomics CBGG
年，卷(期)	2021, 3(2)
作者	Susanne Dreisigacker*,Jose Crossa,Paulino Pérez-Rodríguez,Osval A. Montesinos-L֯ópez,Umesh Rosyara,Philomin Juliana,Suchismita Mondal,Leonardo Crespo-Herrera,Velu Govindan,Ravi P. Singh,H.-J. Braun,
作者单位	International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center CIMMYT, Edo. de México 56237, México ; Colegio de Postgraduados, Motecillos, Edo. de México 56230, México ; Faculty of Telematic, Universidad de Colima, Colima 28040, México ;
Abstract	Wheat is a fundamental crop for improving global food security and the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) has been a central pillar for providing high yielding, nutritious, disease- and climate-resilient wheat varieties to target countries, which is the basis for establishing more resilient agri-food systems especially in the developing world. Increasing wheat yield potential through plant breeding will play a crucial role in fulfilling the projected future global demand of wheat. New emerging technologies and breeding strategies must be looked at to accelerate the rate of genetic gains in wheat. Genomic selection (GS) in one of these strategies that has already demonstrated higher rates of genetic gains in animal breeding and is becoming an essential component of many plant breeding programs including wheat. Throughout the last decades the CIMMYT Global Wheat Program has made significant contributions to promote the implementation of GS in wheat. Several new genome-wide prediction models (e.g., models accounting for genotype × environment interaction or, more recently, deep learning methods) were developed and tested on CIMMYT wheat datasets. GS is routinely implemented in the CIMMYT spring bread wheat program since 2013. Here we summarize the learnings from 10 years of experience with GS in the CIMMYT Global Wheat Program and give a brief outlook on future work.
KeyWord	CIMMYT Global Wheat Program; genomic selection; prediction models; wheat
基金项目
页码	-

参考文献
相关文献

1.Braun H-J, Atlin G, Payne T. Multi-location testing as a tool to identify plant response to global climate change. In: Reynolds MP, editor. Climate change and crop production. Wallingford (UK): CABI, Publishers; 2010. p. 115-38.

2.Foley JA, Ramankutty N, Brauman KA, Cassidy ES, Gerber JS, Johnston M, et al. Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature. 2011;478(7369):337-42.

3.Godfray HCJ, Crute IR, Haddad L, Muir JF, Nisbett N, Lawrence D, et al. The future of the global food system. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 2010;365(1554):2769-77.

4.Lantican MA, Braun H-J, Payne TS, Singh RP, Sonder K, Baum M, et al. Impacts of International Wheat Research 1994-2014. Mexico (Mexico): CIMMYT; 2016.

5.Mondal S, Dutta S, Crespo-Herrera L, Huerta-Espino J, Braun HJ, Singh RP. Fifty years of semi-dwarf spring wheat breeding at CIMMYT: Grain yield progress in optimum, drought and heat stress environments. F Crop Res. 2020;250(February):107757.

6.Fischer R, Wall PC. Wheat breeding in Mexico and yield increases. J Aust Inst Agric Sci. 1976;42:139-48.

7.Waddington SR, Ransom JK, Osmanzai M, Saunders DA. Improvement in the Yield Potential of Bread Wheat Adapted to Northwest Mexico 1. Crop Sci. 1986;26(4):698-703.

8.Sayre KD, Rajaram S, Fischer RA. Yield potential progress in short bread wheats in northwest Mexico. Crop Sci. 1997;37(1):36-42.

9.Lopes MS, Reynolds MP, Jalal-Kamali MR, Moussa M, Feltaous Y, Tahir ISA, et al. The yield correlations of selectable physiological traits in a population of advanced spring wheat lines grown in warm and drought environments. F Crop Res. 2012;128:129-36.

10.Aisawi KAB, Reynolds MP, Singh RP, Foulkes MJ. The physiological basis of the genetic progress in yield potential of CIMMYT spring wheat cultivars from 1966 to 2009. Crop Sci. 2015;55(4):1749-64.

11.Crespo-Herrera LA, Crossa J, Huerta-Espino J, Vargas M, Mondal S, Velu G, et al. Genetic gains for grain yield in cimmyt’s semi-arid wheat yield trials grown in suboptimal environments. Crop Sci. 2018;58(5):1890-8.

12.Crespo-Herrera LA, Crossa J, Huerta-Espino J, Autrique E, Mondal S, Velu G, et al. Genetic yield gains in CIMMYT’S international elite spring wheat yield trials by modeling the genotype × environment interaction. Crop Sci. 2017;57(2):789-801.

13.Honsdorf N, Mulvaney MJ, Singh RP, Ammar K, Burgueño J, Govaerts B, et al. Genotype by tillage interaction and performance progress for bread and durum wheat genotypes on irrigated raised beds. F Crop Res. 2018;216:42-52.

14.Gerard GS, Crespo-Herrera LA, Crossa J, Mondal S, Velu G, Juliana P, et al. Grain yield genetic gains and changes in physiological related traits for CIMMYT’s High Rainfall Wheat Screening Nursery tested across international environments. F Crop Res. 2020;249(February):107742.

15.Berkman PJ, Lai K, Lorenc MT, Edwards D. Next-generation sequencing applications for wheat crop improvement. Am J Bot. 2012;99(2):365-71.

16.Gardiner L-J, Joynson R, Hall A. Next-Generation Sequencing Enabled Genetics in Hexaploid Wheat. In: Miedaner T, Korzun V, editors. Applications of Genetic and Genomic Research in Cereals. Cambridge (United Kingdom): Woodhead Publishing; 2019. p. 49-63.

17.Paux E, Roger D, Badaeva E, Gay G, Bernard M, Sourdille P, et al. Characterizing the composition and evolution of homoeologous genomes in hexaploid wheat through BAC-end sequencing on chromosome 3B. Plant J. 2006;48(3):463-74.

18.Wanjugi H, Coleman-Derr D, Huo N, Kianian SF, Luo MC, Wu J, et al. Rapid development of PCR-based genome-specific repetitive DNA junction markers in wheat. Genome. 2009;52(6):576-87.

19.Ling H-Q, Ma B, Shi X, Liu H, Dong L, Sun H, et al. Genome sequence of the progenitor of wheat A subgenome Triticum urartu. Nature. 2018;557:424-8.

20.Luo MC, Gu YQ, Puiu D, Wang H, Twardziok SO, Deal KR, et al. Genome sequence of the progenitor of the wheat D genome Aegilops tauschii. Nature. 2017;551(7681):498-502.

21.Appels R, Eversole K, Feuillet C, Keller B, Rogers J, Stein N, et al. Shifting the limits in wheat research and breeding using a fully annotated reference genome. Science. 2018;361:6403.

22.Maccaferri M, Harris NS, Twardziok SO, Pasam RK, Gundlach H, Spannagl M, et al. Durum wheat genome highlights past domestication signatures and future improvement targets. Nat Genet. 2019;51(5):885-95.

23.Jia M, Guan J, Zhai Z, Geng S, Zhang X, Mao L, et al. Wheat functional genomics in the era of next generation sequencing: An update. Crop J. 2018;6(1):7-14.

24.Dreisigacker S, Sehgal D, Singh RP, Sansaloni C, Braun H-J. Application of genetic and genomic tools in wheat for developing countries. In: Miedaner T., Korzun V, editors. Application of Genetic and Genomic Research in Cereals. Cambridge (United Kingdom): Woodhead Publishing; 2019. p. 251-71.

25.Lan C, Basnet BR. Overview of Bi-Parental QTL Mapping and Cloning Genes in the Context of Wheat Rust. In: Dreisigacker S, Sehgal D, Reyes Jaimez AE, Luna Garrido B, Zavala, Muñoz S, Núñez Ríos C, editors. CIMMYT Wheat Molecular Genetics: Laboratory protocols and applications to wheat breeding. Mexico (Mexico): CIMMYT; 2016. p. 39-46.

26.Crossa J, Burguen J, Dreisigacker S, Vargas M, Herrera-Foessel SA, Lillemo M, et al. Association Analysis of Historical Bread Wheat Germplasm Using Additive Genetic Covariance of Relatives and Population Structure. Genetics. 2007;177:1-25.

27.Lopes MS, Dreisigacker S, Peña RJ, Sukumaran S, Reynolds MP. Genetic characterization of the wheat association mapping initiative (WAMI) panel for dissection of complex traits in spring wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 2015;128(3):453-64.

28.Sukumaran S, Dreisigacker S, Lopes M, Chavez P, Reynolds MP. Genome-wide association study for grain yield and related traits in an elite spring wheat population grown in temperate irrigated environments. Theor Appl Genet. 2014;128(2):353-63.

29.Singh PK, Crossa J, Duveiller E, Singh RP, Djurle A. Association mapping for resistance to tan spot induced by Pyrenophora tritici-repentis race 1 in CIMMYTs historical bread wheat set. Euphytica. 2016;207(3):515-25.

30.Sehgal D, Autrique E, Singh R, Ellis M, Singh S, Dreisigacker S. Identification of genomic regions for grain yield and yield stability and their epistatic interactions. Sci Rep. 2017;7:1-12.

31.Sehgal D, Mondal S, Guzman C, Garcia Barrios G, Franco C, Singh R, et al. Validation of Candidate Gene-Based Markers and Identification of Novel Loci for Thousand-Grain Weight in Spring Bread Wheat. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10(September):1-12.

32.Battenfield SD, Guzmán C, Chris Gaynor R, Singh RP, Peña RJ, Dreisigacker S, et al. Genomic selection for processing and end-use quality traits in the CIMMYT spring bread wheat breeding program. Plant Genome. 2016;9(2):plantgenome2016-01.

33.Juliana P, Singh RP, Singh PK, Poland JA, Bergstrom GC, Huerta-Espino J, et al. Genome-wide association mapping for resistance to leaf rust, stripe rust and tan spot in wheat reveals potential candidate genes. Theor Appl Genet. 2018;(0123456789):1-18.

34.Gupta V, He X, Kumar N, Fuentes-Davila G, Sharma RK, Dreisigacker S, et al. Genome wide association study of karnal bunt resistance in a wheat germplasm collection from Afghanistan. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(13):3124.

35.Muqaddasi QH, Reif JC, Li Z, Basnet BR, Dreisigacker S, Röder MS. Genome-wide association mapping and genome-wide prediction of anther extrusion in CIMMYT spring wheat. Euphytica. 2017;213(3):73.

36.Velu G, Singh RP, Crespo-Herrera L, Juliana P, Dreisigacker S, Valluru R, et al. Genetic dissection of grain zinc concentration in spring wheat for mainstreaming biofortification in CIMMYT wheat breeding. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):1-10.

37.Meuwissen THE, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME. Prediction of total genetic value using genome wide dense marker map. Genetics. 2001;157:1819-29.

38.Bernardo R. Prediction of maize single-cross performance using RFLPs and information from related hybrids. Crop Sci. 1994;34(1):20-5.

39.Heffner EL, Lorenz AJ, Jannink JL, Sorrells ME. Plant breeding with Genomic selection: Gain per unit time and cost. Crop Sci. 2010;50(5):1681-90.

40.Lorenz AJ, Chao S, Asoro FG, Heffner EL, Hayashi T, Iwata H, et al. Genomic Selection in Plant Breeding. Knowledge and Prospects. Adv Agron. 2011;110:77-123.

41.Pérez P, De Los Campos G. Genome-wide regression and prediction with the BGLR statistical package. Genetics. 2014;198(2):483-95.

42.Crossa J, Pérez P, Hickey J, Burgueño J, Ornella L, Cerón-Rojas J, et al. Genomic prediction in CIMMYT maize and wheat breeding programs. Heredity. 2014;112(1):48-60.

43.Purdy LH, Loegering WQ, Konzak CF, Peterson C., Allan RE. A Proposed Standard Method for Illustrating Pedigrees of Small Grain Varieties. Crop Sci. 1968;8:405-6.

44.Payne TS, Skovmand B, Lopez CG, Brandon E, McNab A. The international wheat information system (IWIS). Mexico (Mexico): CIMMYT; 2002.

45.De Los Campos G, Naya H, Gianola D, Crossa J, Legarra A, Manfredi E, et al. Predicting quantitative traits with regression models for dense molecular markers and pedigree. Genetics. 2009;182(1):375-85.

46.Crossa J, De Los Campos G, Pérez P, Gianola D, Burgueño J, Araus JL, et al. Prediction of genetic values of quantitative traits in plant breeding using pedigree and molecular markers. Genetics. 2010;186(2):713-24.

47.Endelman JB. Ridge Regression and Other Kernels for Genomic Selection with R Package rrBLUP. Plant Genome. 2011;4(3):250-5.

48.Crossa J, Pérez-Rodríguez P, Cuevas J, Montesinos-López O, Jarquín D, de los Campos G, et al. Genomic Selection in Plant Breeding: Methods, Models, and Perspectives. Trends Plant Sci. 2017;22(11):961-75.

49.Gota M, Gianola D. Kernel-based whole-genome prediction of complex traits: A review. Front Genet. 2014;5:1-13.

50.Gianola D, Weigel KA, Krämer N, Stella A, Schön CC. Enhancing genome-enabled prediction by bagging genomic BLUP. PLoS One. 2014;9(4):e91693.

51.González-Camacho JM, de los Campos G, Pérez P, Gianola D, Cairns JE, Mahuku G, et al. Genome-enabled prediction of genetic values using radial basis function neural networks. Theor Appl Genet. 2012;125(4):759-71.

52.González-Camacho JM, Crossa J, Pérez-Rodríguez P, Ornella L, Gianola D. Genome-enabled prediction using probabilistic neural network classifiers. BMC Genomics. 2016;17(1):1-16.

53.Ornella L, Pérez P, Tapia E, González-Camacho JM, Burgueño J, Zhang X, et al. Genomic-enabled prediction with classification algorithms. Heredity. 2014;112(6):616-26.

54.Pérez-Rodríguez P, Gianola D, González-Camacho JM, Crossa J, Manès Y, Dreisigacker S. Comparison between linear and non-parametric regression models for genome-enabled prediction in wheat. G3 (Bethesda). 2012;2(12):1595-605.

55.Gianola D, Van Kaam JBCHM. Reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces regression methods for genomic assisted prediction of quantitative traits. Genetics. 2008;178(4):2289-303.

56.Gianola D, Fernando RL, Stella A. Genomic-Assisted Prediction of Genetic Value with Semiparametric Procedures. Genetics. 2006;173(3):1761-76.

57.Gianola D, Okut H, Weigel KA, Rosa GJM. Predicting complex quantitative traits with Bayesian neural networks: A case study with Jersey cows and wheat. BMC Genet. 2011;12:4-7.

58.De Los Campos G, Gianola D, Rosa GJM, Weigel KA, Crossa J. Semi-parametric genomic-enabled prediction of genetic values using reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces methods. Genet Res (Camb). 2010;92(4):295-308.

59.Pérez-Elizalde S, Cuevas J, Pérez-Rodríguez P, Crossa J. Selection of the Bandwidth Parameter in a Bayesian Kernel Regression Model for Genomic-Enabled Prediction. J Agric Biol Environ Stat. 2015;20(4):512-32.

60.Cuevas J, Crossa J, Soberanis V, Pérez-Elizalde S, Pérez-Rodríguez P, de los Campos G, et al. Genomic Prediction of Genotype × Environment Interaction Kernel Regression Models. Plant Genome. 2016;9(3):plantgenome2016.03.0024.

61.Cuevas J, Crossa J, Montesinos-López OA, Burgueño J, Pérez-Rodríguez P, de los Campos G. Bayesian genomic prediction with genotype × environment interaction kernel models. G3 (Bethesda). 2017;7(1):41-53.

62.Cuevas J, Granato I, Fritsche-Neto R, Montesinos-Lopez OA, Burgueño J, Sousa MB, et al. Genomic-enabled prediction Kernel models with random intercepts for multi-environment trials. G3 (Bethesda). 2018;8(4):1347-65.

63.Bandeira e Sousa M, Cuevas J, Couto EG de O, Pérez-Rodríguez P, Jarquín D, Fritsche-Neto R, et al. Genomic-enabled prediction in maize using kernel models with genotype × environment interaction. G3 (Bethesda). 2017;7(6):1995-2014.

64.Jarquín D, Crossa J, Lacaze X, Du Cheyron P, Daucourt J, Lorgeou J, et al. A reaction norm model for genomic selection using high-dimensional genomic and environmental data. Theor Appl Genet. 2014;127(3):595-607.

65.Cuevas J, Montesinos-López O, Juliana P, Guzmán C, Pérez-Rodríguez P, González-Bucio J, et al. Deep Kernel for genomic and near infrared predictions in multi-environment breeding trials. G3 (Bethesda). 2019;9(9):2913-24.

66.Cho Y, Saul LK. Kernel methods for deep learning. In: Bengio Y, Schuurmans D, Lafferty J, Williams C, Culotta A, editors. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 22 (NIPS 2009). Vancouver (Canada): JLMR publisher; 2009. p. 342-50.

67.Crossa J, Martini JWR, Gianola D, Pérez-Rodríguez P, Jarquin D, Juliana P, et al. Deep Kernel and Deep Learning for Genome-Based Prediction of Single Traits in Multienvironment Breeding Trials. Front Genet. 2019;10(December):1-13.

68.Burgueño J, de los Campos G, Weigel K, Crossa J. Genomic prediction of breeding values when modeling genotype × environment interaction using pedigree and dense molecular markers. Crop Sci. 2012;52(2):707-19.

69.Heslot N, Akdemir D, Sorrells ME, Jannink JL. Integrating environmental covariates and crop modeling into the genomic selection framework to predict genotype by environment interactions. Theor Appl Genet. 2014;127(2):463-80.

70.Vanraden PM. Genomic measures of relationship and inbreeding. Interbull Bull. 2007;25(37):33.

71.VanRaden PM. Efficient Methods to Compute Genomic Predictions. J Dairy Sci. 2008;91(11):4414-23.

72.Pérez-Rodríguez P, Crossa J, Bondalapati K, De Meyer G, Pita F, De Los Campos G. A pedigree-based reaction norm model for prediction of cotton yield in multienvironment trials. Crop Sci. 2015;55(3):1143-51.

73.Crossa J, De Los Campos G, Maccaferri M, Tuberosa R, Burgueño J, Pérez-Rodríguez P. Extending the marker × Environment interaction model for genomic-enabled prediction and genome-wide association analysis in durum wheat. Crop Sci. 2016;56(5):2193-209.

74.Velu G, Crossa J, Singh RP, Hao Y, Dreisigacker S, Perez-Rodriguez P, et al. Genomic prediction for grain zinc and iron concentrations in spring wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 2016;129(8).

75.Lopez-Cruz M, Crossa J, Bonnett D, Dreisigacker S, Poland J, Jannink J-L, et al. Increased Prediction Accuracy in Wheat Breeding Trials Using a Marker × Environment Interaction Genomic Selection Model. G3 (Bethesda). 2015;5(4):569-82.

76.Misztal I, Aguilar I, Johnson DL, Legarra A, Tsuruta S, Lawlor TJ. A unified approach to utilize phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information for genetic evaluation of Holstein final score. Interbull Bull. 2009;40:240-4.

77.Legarra A, Aguilar I, Misztal I. A relationship matrix including full pedigree and genomic information. J Dairy Sci. 2009;92(9):4656-63.

78.Aguilar I, Misztal I, Legarra A, Tsuruta S. Efficient computation of the genomic relationship matrix and other matrices used in single-step evaluation. J Anim Breed Genet. 2011;128(6):422-8.

79.Christensen OF. Correction: Compatibility of pedigree-based and marker-based relationship matrices for single-step genetic evaluation. Genet Sel Evol. 2012;44:37.

80.Pérez-Rodríguez P, Crossa J, Rutkoski J, Poland J, Singh R, Legarra A, et al. Single-Step Genomic and Pedigree Genotype × Environment Interaction Models for Predicting Wheat Lines in International Environments. Plant Genome. 2017;10(2):plantgenome2016.09.0089.

81.Rutkoski J, Poland J, Mondal S, Autrique E, González Párez L, Crossa J, et al. Canopy Temperature and Vegetation Indices from High-Throughput Phenotyping Improve Accuracy of Pedigree and Genomic Selection for Grain Yield in Wheat. G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
[Internet]. 2016;6(September):1-36.

82.Montesinos-López A, Montesinos-López OA, Cuevas J, Mata-López WA, Burgueño J, Mondal S, et al. Genomic Bayesian functional regression models with interactions for predicting wheat grain yield using hyper-spectral image data. Plant Methods. 2017;13(1):1-29.

83.Montesinos-López OA, Montesinos-López A, Crossa J, los Campos G, Alvarado G, Suchismita M, et al. Predicting grain yield using canopy hyperspectral reflectance in wheat breeding data. Plant Methods. 2017;13(1):1-23.

84.Krause MR, González-Pérez L, Crossa J, Pérez-Rodríguez P, Montesinos-López O, Singh RP, et al. Hyperspectral reflectance-derived relationship matrices for genomic prediction of grain yield in wheat. G3 (Bethesda). 2019;9(4):1231-47.

85.Zondervan KT, Cardon LR. The complex interplay among factors that influence allelic association. Nat Rev Genet. 2004;5(2):89-100.

86.Cuyabano BCD, Su G, Rosa GJM, Lund MS, Gianola D. Bootstrap study of genome-enabled prediction reliabilities using haplotype blocks across Nordic Red cattle breeds. J Dairy Sci. 2015;98(10):7351-63.

87.Cuyabano BCD, Su G, Lund MS. Selection of haplotype variables from a high-density marker map for genomic prediction. Genet Sel Evol. 2015;47(1):1-11.

88.Jiang Y, Schmidt RH, Reif JC. Haplotype-based genome-wide prediction models exploit local epistatic interactions among markers. G3 (Bethesda). 2018;8(5):1687-99.

89.Cuyabano BCD, Su G, Lund MS. Genomic prediction of genetic merit using LD-based haplotypes in the Nordic Holstein population. BMC Genomics. 2014;15(1):1-11.

90.Clark AG. The role of haplotypes in candidate gene studies. Genet Epidemiol. 2004;27(4):321-33.

91.Zhang Z, Wang W, Valdar W. Bayesian modeling of haplotype effects in multiparent populations. Genetics. 2014;198(1):139-56.

92.Spindel JE, Begum H, Akdemir D, Collard B, Redoña E, Jannink JL, et al. Genome-wide prediction models that incorporate de novo GWAS are a powerful new tool for tropical rice improvement. Heredity. 2016;116(4):395-408.

93.Bian Y, Holland JB. Enhancing genomic prediction with genome-wide association studies in multiparental maize populations. Heredity. 2017;118(6):585-93.

94.Jiang Y, Reif JC. Modeling epistasis in genomic selection. Genetics. 2015;201(2):759-68.

95.Sehgal D, Rosyara U, Mondal S, Singh R, Poland J, Dreisigacker S. Incorporating Genome-Wide Association Mapping Results Into Genomic Prediction Models for Grain Yield and Yield Stability in CIMMYT Spring Bread Wheat. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11(March):1-12.

96.Samuel AL. Some studies in machine learning using the game of checkers. IBM J Res Dev. 1959;3(3):207-19.

97.Lewis ND. Deep learning made easy with R. A gentle introduction for data science. Scotts Valley (CA, USA): CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform; 2016.

98.Cybenko G. Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function. MathControl Signals Syst. 1989;2:303-14.

99.Hornik K. Approximation Capabilities of Multilayer Neural Network. Neural Networks. 1991;4(1991):251-7.

100.Chollet F, Allaire JJ. Deep learning with R. New Delhi (India): Manning Publications, Manning Early Access Program (MEA); 2017.

101.Montesinos-López OA, Montesinos-López A, Crossa J, Gianola D, Hernández-Suárez CM, Martín-Vallejo J. Multi-trait, multi-environment deep learning modeling for genomic-enabled prediction of plant traits. G3 (Bethesda). 2018;8(12):3829-40.

102.Montesinos-López OA, Martín-Vallejo J, Crossa J, Gianola D, Hernández-Suárez CM, Montesinos-López A, et al. A benchmarking between deep learning, support vector machine and Bayesian threshold best linear unbiased prediction for predicting ordinal traits in plant breeding. G3 (Bethesda). 2019;9(2):601-18.

103.Montesinos-López A, Montesinos-López OA, Gianola D, Crossa J, Hernández-Suárez CM. Multi-environment genomic prediction of plant traits using deep learners with dense architecture. G3 (Bethesda). 2018;8(12):3813-28.

104.Montesinos-López OA, Montesinos-López A, Hernández MV, Ortiz-Monasterio I, Pérez-Rodríguez P, Burgueño J, et al. Multivariate bayesian analysis of on-farm trials with multiple-trait and multiple-environment data. Agron J. 2019;111(6):2658-69.

105.Bassi FM, Bentley AR, Charmet G, Ortiz R, Crossa J. Breeding schemes for the implementation of genomic selection in wheat (Triticum spp.). Plant Sci. 2016;242:23-36.

106.Gaynor RC, Gorjanc G, Bentley AR, Ober ES, Howell P, Jackson R, et al. A two-part strategy for using genomic selection to develop inbred lines. Crop Sci. 2017;57(5):2372-86.

107.Pérez-Rodríguez P, Burgueño J, Montesinos-López O., Singh RP, Juliana P, Mondal S, et al. Prediction with Big Data in the Genomic and High-throughput Phenotyping Era: A Case Study with Wheat Data. In: Kang MS, editor. Quantitative Genetics, Genomics and Plant Breeding. 2nd ed. Wallingford (United Kingdom): CAB International; 2020.

108.Juliana P, Singh RP, Poland J, Mondal S, Crossa J, Montesinos‐López OA, et al. Prospects and Challenges of Applied Genomic Selection—A New Paradigm in Breeding for Grain Yield in Bread Wheat. Plant Genome. 2018;11(3):1-17.

109.Juliana P, Montesinos-López OA, Crossa J, Mondal S, González Pérez L, Poland J, et al. Integrating genomic-enabled prediction and high-throughput phenotyping in breeding for climate-resilient bread wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 2019;132(1):177-94.

110.Juliana P, Poland J, Huerta-Espino J, Shrestha S, Crossa J, Crespo-Herrera L, et al. Improving grain yield, stress resilience and quality of bread wheat using large-scale genomics. Nat Genet. 2019;51(10):1530-9.

111.Verges VL, van Sanford DA. Genomic selection at preliminary yield trial stage: Training population design to predict untested lines. Agronomy. 2020;10(1):1-16.

112.Basnet BR, Crossa J, Dreisigacker S, Pérez‐Rodríguez P, Manes Y, Singh RP, et al. Hybrid Wheat Prediction Using Genomic, Pedigree, and Environmental Covariables Interaction Models. Plant Genome. 2019;12(1):1-13.

113.Gorjanc G, Jenko J, Hearne SJ, Hickey JM. Initiating maize pre-breeding programs using genomic selection to harness polygenic variation from landrace populations. BMC Genomics. 2016;17(1):1-15.

114.Crossa J, Jarquín D, Franco J, Pérez-Rodríguez P, Burgueño J, Saint-Pierre C, et al. Genomic prediction of gene bank wheat landraces. G3 (Bethesda). 2016;6(7):1819-34.

115.Hickey JM, Chiurugwi T, Mackay I, Powell W. Genomic prediction unifies animal and plant breeding programs to form platforms for biological discovery. Nat Genet. 2017;49(9):1297-303.

116.Watson A, Hickey LT, Christopher J, Rutkoski J, Poland J, Hayes BJ. Multivariate genomic selection and potential of rapid indirect selection with speed breeding in spring wheat. Crop Sci. 2019;59(5):1945-59.

117.Mondal S, Rutkoski JE, Velu G, Singh PK, Crespo-Herrera LA, Guzman CG, et al. Harnessing diversity in wheat to enhance grain yield, climate resilience, disease and insect pest resistance and nutrition through conventional and modern breeding approaches. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7(July):991.

118.Lado B, Battenfield S, Guzmán C, Quincke M, Singh RP, Dreisigacker S, et al. Strategies for Selecting Crosses Using Genomic Prediction in Two Wheat Breeding Programs. Plant Genome. 2017;10(2):plantgenome2016.12.0128.

119.Yao J, Zhao D, Chen X, Zhang Y, Wang J. Use of genomic selection and breeding simulation in cross prediction for improvement of yield and quality in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Crop J. 2018;6(4):353-65.

120.Akdemir D, Sánchez JI. Efficient breeding by genomic mating. Front Genet. 2016;7:1-12.

121.Gorjanc G, Gaynor RC, Hickey JM. Optimal cross selection for long-term genetic gain in two-part programs with rapid recurrent genomic selection. Theor Appl Genet. 2018;131(9):1953-66.

122.Hickey JM, Dreisigacker S, Crossa J, Hearne S, Babu R, Prasanna BM, et al. Evaluation of genomic selection training population designs and genotyping strategies in plant breeding programs using simulation. Crop Sci. 2014;54(4):1476-88.

123.Bernardo R. Parental selection, number of breeding populations, and size of each population in inbred development. Theor Appl Genet. 2003;107(7):1252-6.

124.Witcombe JR, Gyawali S, Subedi M, Virk DS, Joshi KD. Plant breeding can be made more efficient by having fewer, better crosses. BMC Plant Biol. 2013;13(1):1-12.

125.Byerlee D, Dubin HJ. Crop improvement in the CGIAR as a global success story of open access and international collaboration. Int J Commons. 2009;4(1):452.

126.Reynolds MP, Braun HJ, Cavalieri AJ, Chapotin S, Davies WJ, Ellul P, et al. Improving global integration of crop research. Science. 2017;357(6349):359-60.

引用本文

Susanne Dreisigacker*,Jose Crossa,Paulino Pérez-Rodríguez,Osval A. Montesinos-L֯ópez,Umesh Rosyara,Philomin Juliana,Suchismita Mondal,Leonardo Crespo-Herrera,Velu Govindan,Ravi P. Singh,H.-J. Braun. Implementation of Genomic Selection in the CIMMYT Global Wheat Program, Findings from the Past 10 Years, Crop Breeding, Genetics and Genomics. 2021; 3; (2). https://doi.org/10.20900/cbgg20210005.

文献评论

相关学者

相关机构