Multi-Locus Association Mapping Uncovers the Genetic Basis of Yield and Agronomic Traits in Chile Pepper (<i>Capsicum</i> spp.)-Crop Breeding, Genetics and Genomics-CSCIED科技核心评价数据库-手机版

Multi-Locus Association Mapping Uncovers the Genetic Basis of Yield and Agronomic Traits in Chile Pepper (Capsicum spp.)

Multi-Locus Association Mapping Uncovers the Genetic Basis of Yield and Agronomic Traits in Chile Pepper (Capsicum spp.)

ES评分 0 浏览量：1030 下载量：0

全文阅读下载引用收藏

DOI	10.20900/cbgg20220002
刊名	Crop Breeding, Genetics and Genomics CBGG
年，卷(期)	2022, 4(2)
作者	Dennis N. Lozada*,Derek W. Barchenger,Danise Coon,Madhav Bhatta,Paul W. Bosland,
作者单位	Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA ; World Vegetable Center, Shanhua, Tainan 74151, Taiwan ; Chile Pepper Institute, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA ; Bayer Crop Science, Chesterfield, MO 63017, USA ;
Abstract	Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) are one of the foundations for modern molecular breeding for plant genetic improvement. Single-locus GWAS methodologies impose constraints in association mapping due to the complex nature of quantitative traits and the often-stringent thresholds used. Multi-locus models, therefore, serve as alternative approaches in identifying significant marker-trait associations. This study used six multi-locus models to determine quantitative trait loci (QTL) associated with yield and agronomic traits in a diverse population of chile pepper evaluated in New Mexico, USA. Using the GWAS models, eight genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS)-derived single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers across six chromosomes were identified to be associated with multiple traits. Plant height shared similar genetic control with plant width, whereas total yield per plant had common QTL with yield components. Epigenetic mechanisms such as methylation and chromatin remodeling and organization were predicted for first pod date and flowering time. The diverse functions of candidate genes identified reflect the complex genomic architecture of the evaluated traits. Allele specific assays for the identified QTL will be developed and validated for marker-assisted selection and genome-wide selection towards the genetic improvement of chile pepper.
KeyWord	genome-wide association study; genotyping-by-sequencing; marker-assisted selection; quantitative trait loci; single nucleotide polymorphisms
基金项目
页码	-

参考文献
相关文献

1.Lozada DN, Bosland P, Barchenger DW, Haghshenas-Jaryani M, Sanogo S, Walker S. Chile Pepper (Capsicum) Breeding and Improvement in the “Multi-Omics” Era. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:879182.

2.Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAOSTAT statistics database. Available from: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL. Accessed 2022 May 16.

3.Culler K. New Mexico Chiles: History, Legend and Lore. Charleston (US): Arcadia Publishing; 2015.

4.Walker SJ, Funk P, Joukhadar I, Place T, Havlik C, Tonnessen B. ‘NuMex Odyssey’, a New Mexico-type Green Chile Pepper for Mechanical Harvest. HortScience. 2021;56(12):1605-7.

5.Barchenger DW, Lamour KH, Bosland PW. Challenges and strategies for breeding resistance in Capsicum annuum to the multifarious pathogen, Phytophthora capsici. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:628.

6.Sammis TW, Shukla MK, Mexal JG, Bosland PW, Daugherty LA. Improving the chile industry of New Mexico through industry, agriculture experiment station, and Cooperative Extension Service collaboration: A case study. J Ext. 2009;47(1):1RIB4.

7.USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service. 2021 New Mexico Chile Production. Available from: https://www.nass.usda.gov/Statistics_by_State/New_Mexico/Publications/Special_Interest_Reports/NM-2021-Chile-Production.pdf. Accessed 2022 May 16.

8.Kim S, Park M, Yeom SI, Kim YM, Lee JM, Lee HA, et al. Genome sequence of the hot pepper provides insights into the evolution of pungency in Capsicum species. Nat Genet. 2014;46(3):270-8.

9.Qin C, Yu C, Shen Y, Fang X, Chen L, Min J, et al. Whole-genome sequencing of cultivated and wild peppers provides insights into Capsicum domestication and specialization. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2014;111(14):5135-40.

10.Hulse-Kemp AM, Maheshwari S, Stoffel K, Hill TA, Jaffe D, Williams SR, et al. Reference quality assembly of the 3.5-Gb genome of Capsicum annuum from a single linked-read library. Hort Res. 2018;5(1):1-13.

11.Zhu C, Gore M, Buckler ES, Yu J. Status and prospects of association mapping in plants. Plant Genome. 2008;1(1):5-20.

12.Lander ES, Schork NJ. Genetic dissection of complex traits. Science. 1994;265(5181):2037-48.

13.Patterson N, Price AL, Reich D. Population structure and eigenanalysis. PLoS Genet. 2006;2(12):e190.

14.Price AL, Patterson NJ, Plenge RM, Weinblatt ME, Shadick NA, Reich D. Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet. 2006;38(8):904-9.

15.Yu J, Pressoir G, Briggs WH, Bi IV, Yamasaki M, Doebley JF, et al. A unified mixed-model method for association mapping that accounts for multiple levels of relatedness. Nat Genet. 2006;38(2):203-8.

16.Kang HM, Zaitlen NA, Wade CM, Kirby A, Heckerman D, Daly MJ, et al. Efficient control of population structure in model organism association mapping. Genetics. 2008;178(3):1709-23.

17.Zhang Z, Ersoz E, Lai C, Todhunter RJ, Tiwari HK, Gore MA, et al. Mixed linear model approach adapted for genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet. 2010;42(4):355-60.

18.Kang HM, Sul JH, Service SK, Zaitlen NA, Kong S, Freimer NB, et al. Variance component model to account for sample structure in genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet. 2010;42(4):348-54.

19.Zhou X, Stephens M. Genome-wide efficient mixed-model analysis for association studies. Nat Genet. 2012;44(7):821-4.

20.Wang SB, Feng JY, Ren WL, Huang B, Zhou L, Wen YJ, et al. Improving power and accuracy of genome-wide association studies via a multi-locus mixed linear model methodology. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):1-10.

21.Colonna V, D’Agostino N, Garrison E, Albrechtsen A, Meisner J, Facchiano A, et al. Genomic diversity and novel genome-wide association with fruit morphology in Capsicum, from 746k polymorphic sites. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):1-14.

22.Nimmakayala P, Abburi VL, Saminathan T, Alaparthi SB, Almeida A, Davenport B, et al. Genome-wide diversity and association mapping for capsaicinoids and fruit weight in Capsicum annuum L. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):38081.

23.Lee HY, Ro NY, Patil A, Lee JH, Kwon JK, Kang BC. Uncovering Candidate Genes Controlling Major Fruit-Related Traits in Pepper via Genotype-by-Sequencing Based QTL Mapping and Genome-Wide Association Study. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11:1100.

24.Siddique MI, Lee HY, Ro NY, Han K, Venkatesh J, Solomon AM, et al. Identifying candidate genes for Phytophthora capsici resistance in pepper (Capsicum annuum) via genotyping-by-sequencing-based QTL mapping and genome-wide association study. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):9962.

25.Zhang YM, Jia Z, Dunwell JM. The applications of new multi-locus GWAS methodologies in the genetic dissection of complex traits. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10:100.

26.Su J, Ma Q, Li M, Hao F, Wang C. Multi-locus genome-wide association studies of fiber-quality related traits in Chinese early-maturity upland cotton. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:1169.

27.Li C, Fu Y, Sun R, Wang Y, Wang Q. Single-locus and multi-locus genome-wide association studies in the genetic dissection of fiber quality traits in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:1083.

28.Tibbs-Cortes L, Zhang Z, Yu J. Status and prospects of genome‐wide association studies in plants. Plant Genome. 2021;14(1):e20077.

29.Segura V, Vilhjálmsson BJ, Platt A, Korte A, Seren Ü, Long Q, et al. An efficient multi-locus mixed-model approach for genome-wide association studies in structured populations. Nat Genet. 2012;44(7):825-30.

30.Goddard ME, Wray NR, Verbyla K, Visscher PM. Estimating effects and making predictions from genome-wide marker data. Stat Sci. 2009;24(4):517-29.

31.Peng Y, Liu H, Chen J, Shi T, Zhang C, Sun D, et al. Genome-wide association studies of free amino acid levels by six multi-locus models in bread wheat. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:1196.

32.Malik P, Kumar J, Singh S, Sharma S, Meher PK, Sharma MK, et al. Single-trait, multi-locus and multi-trait GWAS using four different models for yield traits in bread wheat. Mol Breed. 2021;41(8):1-21.

33.Zhang Y, Liu P, Zhang X, Zheng Q, Chen M, Ge F, et al. Multi-locus genome-wide association study reveals the genetic architecture of stalk lodging resistance-related traits in maize. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:611.

34.Misra G, Badoni S, Domingo CJ, Cuevas RPO, Llorente C, Mbanjo EGN, et al. Deciphering the genetic architecture of cooked rice texture. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:1405.

35.Zhong H, Liu S, Sun T, Kong W, Deng X, Peng Z, et al. Multi-locus genome-wide association studies for five yield-related traits in rice. BMC Plant Biol. 2021;21(1):1-12.

36.Lü H, Yang Y, Li H, Liu Q, Zhang J, Yin J, et al. Genome-wide association studies of photosynthetic traits related to phosphorus efficiency in soybean. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:1226.

37.Fang Y, Liu S, Dong Q, Zhang K, Tian Z, Li X, et al. Linkage analysis and multi-locus genome-wide association studies identify QTNs controlling soybean plant height. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11:9.

38.Liu R, Gong J, Xiao X, Zhang Z, Li J, Liu A, et al. GWAS analysis and QTL identification of fiber quality traits and yield components in upland cotton using enriched high-density SNP markers. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:1067.

39.Nakayama R. Notice of the Naming and Release of ‘NuMex Big Jim,’a Semi-Mild Pungent Chile Variety for New Mexico. Las Cruces (US): New Mexico State University Agricultural Experiment Station; 1975.

40.Bosland PW, Coon D. ‘NuMex Heritage Big Jim’ New Mexican Chile Pepper. HortScience. 2013;48(5):657-8.

41.Bosland PW, Coon D. ‘NuMex Sandia Select’ New Mexican Chile Pepper. HortScience. 2014;49(5):667-8.

42.Bosland PW, Iglesias J, Gonzalez MM. ‘NuMex Joe E. Parker’ Chile. HortScience. 1993;28(4):347-8.

43.Bosland PW. ‘NuMex Heritage 6-4’ New Mexican Chile Pepper. HortScience. 2012;47(5):675-6.

44.Bosland PW. ‘NuMex Vaquero’ Jalapeno. HortScience. 2010;45(10):1552-3.

45.Bosland PW, Strausbaugh CA. ‘NuMex Las Cruces’ Cayenne Pepper. HortScience. 2010;45(11):1751-2.

46.Walker SJ. ‘NuMex R. Vince Hernandez’ Paprika-type Chile. HortScience. 2015;50(12):1820-1.

47.Coon D, Bosland PW. The chile cultivars of New Mexico State University released from 1913 to 2016. Available from: https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/20183214356. Accessed 2022 May 17.

48.Bosland PW, Coon D, Reeves G. ‘Trinidad Moruga Scorpion’ pepper is the world’s hottest measured chile pepper at more than two million Scoville heat units. Horttechnology. 2012;22(4):534-8.

49.Bosland PW, Coon D. ‘NuMex NoBasco’: A No-heat Tabasco-type Chile Pepper. HortScience. 2020;55(5):741-2.

50.National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. National Climatic Data Center Climate Data Online Search. Available from: https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cdo-web/search. Accessed 2022 May 10.

51.Rodríguez F, Alvarado G, Pacheco Á, Burgueño J. “ACBD-R. Augmented Complete Block Design with R for Windows. Version 4.0”. Available from: https://data.cimmyt.org/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=hdl:11529/10855. Accessed 2022 May 16.

52.Aravind J, Mukesh Sankar S, Wankhede DP, Kaur V. augmentedRCBD: Analysis of Augmented Randomised Complete Block Designs (R package version 0.1.3). Available from: https://mran.microsoft.com/snapshot/2020-09-11/web/packages/augmentedRCBD/readme/README.html. Accessed 2022 May 17.

53.R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (Internet). Available from: https://www.r-project.org/. Accessed 2022 May 17.

54.Jahufer MZZ, Luo D. DeltaGen: A comprehensive decision support tool for plant breeders. Crop Sci. 2018;58(3):1118-31.

55.JMP® 13.2.1. Cary (US): SAS Institute Inc.; 1989-2021.

56.Sharma H, Shukla MK, Bosland PW, Steiner R. Soil moisture sensor calibration, actual evapotranspiration, and crop coefficients for drip irrigated greenhouse chile peppers. Agric Water Manag. 2017;179:81-91.

57.Lozada DN, Bhatta M, Coon D, Bosland PW. Single nucleotide polymorphisms reveal genetic diversity in New Mexican chile peppers (Capsicum Spp.). BMC Genom. 2021;22:356.

58.Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(15):2114-20.

59.Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(14):1754-60.

60.Garrison E, Marth G. Haplotype-based variant detection from short-read sequencing. Available from: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1207.3907.pdf. Accessed 2022 May 16.

61.Bradbury PJ, Zhang Z, Kroon DE, Casstevens TM, Ramdoss Y, Buckler ES. TASSEL: software for association mapping of complex traits in diverse samples. Bioinformatics. 2007;23(19):2633-5.

62.Money D, Gardner K, Migicovsky Z, Schwaninger H, Zhong GY, Myles S. LinkImpute: Fast and Accurate Genotype Imputation for Nonmodel Organisms. G3. 2015;5(11):2383-90.

63.Tajima F. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics. 1989;123(3):585-95.

64.Meirmans PG. Genodive version 3.0: Easy‐to‐use software for the analysis of genetic data of diploids and polyploids. Mol Ecol Resour. 2020;20(4):1126-31.

65.Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro JM. Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics. 1992;131(2):479-91.

66.Kamvar ZN, Tabima JF, Grünwald NJ. Poppr: an R package for genetic analysis of populations with clonal, partially clonal, and/or sexual reproduction. PeerJ. 2014;2:e281.

67.Graebner RC, Hayes PM, Hagerty CH, Cuesta-Marcos A. A comparison of polymorphism information content and mean of transformed kinships as criteria for selecting informative subsets of barley (Hordeum vulgare L. sl) from the USDA Barley Core Collection. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2016;63(3):477-82.

68.Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics. 2000;155(2):945-59.

69.Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol. 2005;14(8):2611-20.

70.Earl DA, VonHoldt BM. STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv Genet Resour. 2012;4(2):359-61.

71.Criscuolo NG, Angelini C. StructuRly: A novel shiny app to produce comprehensive, detailed and interactive plots for population genetic analysis. PLoS One. 2020;15(2):e0229330.

72.Weir BS, Cockerham C. Genetic data analysis II: Methods for discrete population genetic data. Sunderland (US): Sinauer Associates Inc.; 1996.

73.Hill WG, Weir BS. Variances and covariances of squared linkage disequilibria in finite populations. Theor Popul Biol. 1988;33(1):54-78.

74.Remington DL, Thornsberry JM, Matsuoka Y, Wilson LM, Whitt SR, Doebley J, et al. Structure of linkage disequilibrium and phenotypic associations in the maize genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2001;98(20):11479-84.

75.Zhang YW, Tamba CL, Wen YJ, Li P, Ren WL, Ni YL, et al. mrMLM v4. 0: An R platform for multi-locus genome-wide association studies. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2020;18(4):481-87.

76.Tamba CL, Zhang YM. A fast mrMLM algorithm for multi-locus genome-wide association studies. biorxiv 341784
[Preprint]. 2018 Jun 7. doi: 10.1101/341784

77.Wen YJ, Zhang H, Ni YL, Huang B, Zhang J, Feng JY, et al. Methodological implementation of mixed linear models in multi-locus genome-wide association studies. Brief Bioinform. 2018;19(4):700-12.

78.Zhang J, Feng JY, Ni YL, Wen YJ, Niu Y, Tamba CL, et al. pLARmEB: integration of least angle regression with empirical Bayes for multilocus genome-wide association studies. Heredity. 2017;118(6):517-24.

79.Ren WL, Wen YJ, Dunwell JM, Zhang YM. pKWmEB: integration of Kruskal–Wallis test with empirical Bayes under polygenic background control for multi-locus genome-wide association study. Heredity. 2018;120(3):208-18.

80.Tamba CL, Ni YL, Zhang YM. Iterative sure independence screening EM-Bayesian LASSO algorithm for multi-locus genome-wide association studies. PLoS Comput Biol. 2017;13(1):e1005357.

81.Bolser D, Staines DM, Pritchard E, Kersey P. Ensembl plants: integrating tools for visualizing, mining, and analyzing plant genomics data. In: Edwards D, editors. Plant bioinformatics. New York (US): Humana Press; 2016. p. 115-40.

82.Thornsberry JM, Goodman MM, Doebley J, Kresovich S, Nielsen D, Buckler ES. Dwarf8 polymorphisms associate with variation in flowering time. Nat Genet. 2001;28(3):286-9.

83.Brachi B, Morris GP, Borevitz JO. Genome-wide association studies in plants: the missing heritability is in the field. Genome Biol. 2011;12(10):1-8.

84.Parry C, Wang YW, Lin S, Barchenger DW. Reproductive compatibility in Capsicum is not necessarily reflected in genetic or phenotypic similarity between species complexes. PLoS One. 2021;16(3):e0243689.

85.Taranto F, D’Agostino N, Greco B, Cardi T, Tripodi P. Genome-wide SNP discovery and population structure analysis in pepper (Capsicum annuum) using genotyping by sequencing. BMC Genom. 2016;17(1):943.

86.Gaut BS, Long AD. The lowdown on linkage disequilibrium. Plant Cell. 2003;15(7):1502-6.

87.Pereira-Dias L, Vilanova S, Fita A, Prohens J, Rodríguez-Burruezo A. Genetic diversity, population structure, and relationships in a collection of pepper (Capsicum spp.) landraces from the Spanish centre of diversity revealed by genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS). Hort Res. 2019;6(1):54.

88.Han K, Lee H, Ro N, Hur O, Lee J, Kwon J, et al. QTL mapping and GWAS reveal candidate genes controlling capsaicinoid content in Capsicum. Plant Biotechnol J. 2018;16(9):1546-58.

89.Tripodi P, Rabanus-Wallace MT, Barchi L, Kale S, Esposito S, Acquadro A, et al. Global range expansion history of pepper (Capsicum spp.) revealed by over 10,000 genebank accessions. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2021;118(34):e2104315118.

90.Wu L, Wang P, Wang Y, Cheng Q, Lu Q, Liu J, et al. Genome-Wide Correlation of 36 Agronomic Traits in the 287 Pepper (Capsicum) Accessions Obtained from the SLAF-seq-Based GWAS. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(22):5675.

91.Dwivedi N, Kumar R, Paliwal R, Kumar U, Kumar S, Singh M, et al. QTL mapping for important horticultural traits in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). J Plant Biochem Biotechnol. 2015;24(2):154-60.

92.Stommel JR, Griesbach RJ. Inheritance of fruit, foliar, and plant habit attributes in Capsicum. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 2008;133(3):396-407.

93.Han K, Jeong HJ, Yang HB, Kang SM, Kwon JK, Kim S, et al. An ultra-high-density bin map facilitates high-throughput QTL mapping of horticultural traits in pepper (Capsicum annuum). DNA Res. 2016;23(2):81-91.

94.Barchenger DW, Clark RA, Gniffke PA, Ledesma DR, Lin S, Hanson P, et al. Stability of yield and yield components of pepper (Capsicum annuum), and evaluation of publicly available predictive meteorological data in East and Southeast Asia. HortScience. 2018;53(12):1776-83.

95.Lu FH, Kwon SW, Yoon MY, Kim KT, Cho MC, Yoon MK, et al. SNP marker integration and QTL analysis of 12 agronomic and morphological traits in F 8 RILs of pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Mol Cells. 2012;34(1):25-34.

96.Rawoof A, Ahmad I, Ramchiary N. Epigenome landscape in Capsicum genome. In: Ramchiary N, Kole C, editors. The Capsicum Genome. Cham (Switzerland): Springer; 2019. p. 187-99.

97.Du JS, Hang LF, Hao Q, Yang HT, Ali S, Badawy RSE, et al. The dissection of R genes and locus Pc5. 1 in Phytophthora capsici infection provides a novel view of disease resistance in peppers. BMC Genom. 2021;22(1):1-16.

98.Lozada DN, Whelpley M, Acuña-Galindo A. Genetic Architecture of Chile Pepper (Capsicum spp.) QTLome Revealed Using Meta-QTL Analysis. Horticulturae. 2021;7(8):227.

99.Kumar A, Kumar S, Anju T, Ramchiary N. Genetic, Epigenetic, and Hormonal Regulation of Fruit Development and Ripening in Capsicum L. Species. Annu Plant Rev. 2018;4(2):295-356.

100.Yang S, Yang T, Tang Y, Aisimutuola P, Zhang G, Wang B, et al. Transcriptomic profile analysis of non-coding RNAs involved in Capsicum chinense Jacq. fruit ripening. Sci Hortic. 2020;264:109158.

引用本文

Dennis N. Lozada*,Derek W. Barchenger,Danise Coon,Madhav Bhatta,Paul W. Bosland. Multi-Locus Association Mapping Uncovers the Genetic Basis of Yield and Agronomic Traits in Chile Pepper (Capsicum spp.), Crop Breeding, Genetics and Genomics. 2022; 4; (2). https://doi.org/10.20900/cbgg20220002.

文献评论

相关学者

相关机构