延续性护理干预对膝关节置换术患者术后康复的效果及SAS、SDS评分影响评价
Effect of continuous nursing intervention on postoperative rehabilitation of patients with knee joint replacementand evaluation of SAS and SDS scores
ES评分 0
| DOI |
10.12208/j.jacn.20230002 |
| 刊名 |
Journal of Advances in Clinical Nursing
|
| 年，卷(期) |
2023, 2(1) |
| 作者 |
|
| 作者单位 |
华中科技大学同济医院附属同济医院 湖北武汉 ;
|
| 摘要 |
针对于膝关节置换术患者，采用延续性护理干预方法，分析和研究最终的护理效果。方法 在2020年6月-2021年6月，我院共收治了60例膝关节置换术患者，将这60例膝关节置换术患者，平均分为两个组别，一组是观察组，另一组是对照组，每组中各有膝关节置换术患者30例。其中，给予对照组患者常规护理干预，给予观察组患者延续性护理干预，对比两组最终的护理干预效果。结果 在SAS、SDS评分方面，护理前，两组患者数据差异性不显著，P＞0.05，具有统计学意义；护理后，观察组数据均优于对照组数据，数据差异性显著，P＜0.05，具有统计学意义。在膝关节功能比较方面，观察组的优良率高于对照组的优良率，数据差异性显著，P＜0.05，具有统计学意义。结论 延续性护理干预对膝关节置换术患者术后康复的效果显著，临床中值得大力推广和实践。
|
| Abstract |
Objective to analyze and study the final nursing effect of the patients with knee joint replacement by adopting the continuous nursing intervention method. Methods from June 2020 to June 2010,60 patients with knee 2021 were treated in our hospital. The 60 patients were divided into two groups on average, the other group is the control group, each group has 30 patients with knee replacement. Results there was no significant difference in SAS and SDS scores between the two groups before nursing (P > 0.05) , but after nursing, the data of Observation Group were better than that of control group (p < 0.05) , statistically significant. In the comparison of knee joint function, the excellent and good rate of the observation group was higher than that of the control group, the difference was significant (p < 0.05) . Conclusion the effect of continuous nursing intervention on postoperative rehabilitation of patients with knee joint replacement is significant, and it is worth promoting and practicing in clinical practice.
|
| 关键词 |
延续性护理干预；膝关节置换术；SAS和SDS评分
|
| KeyWord |
continuous nursing intervention; knee joint replacement; SAS and SDS scores
|
| 基金项目 |
|
| 页码 |
4-7 |
陈田红*.
延续性护理干预对膝关节置换术患者术后康复的效果及SAS、SDS评分影响评价 [J].
临床护理进展.
2023; 2; (1).
4 - 7.