消化性溃疡患者不良生活习惯护理干预的效果观察

Observation on the effect of nursing intervention for patients with peptic ulcer with bad living habits

ES评分 0

DOI 10.12208/j.ijnr.20230008
刊名
International Journal of Nursing Research
年,卷(期) 2023, 5(1)
作者
作者单位

空军第九八六医院 陕西西安 ;

摘要
分析消化性溃疡患者不良生活习惯护理干预的效果。方法 回顾性分析106例消化性溃疡患者临床资料,入院时间均为2020年3月-2022年5月,随机分两组,Ⅰ组53例患者,采用护理干预,Ⅱ组53例患者,采用常规干预,比较Ⅰ组及Ⅱ组患者的护理效果。结果 Ⅰ组溃疡愈合率与HP根除率从表1看出明显高于Ⅱ组,两组有统计学意义(P<0.05)。Ⅰ组生活质量评分从表2看出明显高于Ⅱ组,两组有统计学意义(P<0.05)。干预前,Ⅰ组负面情绪评分与Ⅱ组比较区别较小,无统计学意义(P>0.05);干预后,Ⅰ组及Ⅱ组患者的负面情绪评分均有所改善,Ⅰ组负面情绪评分从表3看出明显低于Ⅱ组,两组有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 消化性溃疡患者不良生活习惯护理干预的效果尤为突出,值得临床推广利用。
Abstract
Objective: To analyze the effect of nursing intervention on patients with peptic ulcer with bad living habits. Methods The clinical data of 106 patients with peptic ulcer were retrospectively analyzed. The admission time was from March 2020 to May 2022. They were randomly divided into two groups, group I (53 patients) and group II (53 patients). The nursing effects of group I and group II were compared. Results The ulcer healing rate and HP eradication rate in group I were significantly higher than those in group II (P<0.05). The quality of life score of group I was significantly higher than that of group II (P<0.05). Before the intervention, there was little difference in negative emotion score between group I and group II, and there was no statistical significance (P > 0.05). After the intervention, the scores of negative emotions of patients in group I and group II were improved, and the scores of negative emotions in group I were significantly lower than those in group II, which was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion The effect of nursing intervention for patients with peptic ulcer with bad living habits is particularly prominent, which is worthy of clinical application.
关键词
护理干预;消化道溃疡;护理;临床效果
KeyWord
Nursing Intervention; Gastrointestinal Ulcer; Nursing; Clinical Effect
基金项目
页码 25-27
  • 参考文献
  • 相关文献
  • 引用本文

荆玉洁*. 消化性溃疡患者不良生活习惯护理干预的效果观察 [J]. 国际护理学研究. 2023; 5; (1). 25 - 27.

  • 文献评论

相关学者

相关机构