Journal of Advances in Clinical Nursing

Objective To analyze the value of humanized nursing for senile respiratory failure. Methods: From August 2020 to August 2022, 82 elderly patients (n=82) with respiratory failure were randomly divided into experimental group and control group, with 41 patients in each group. The former received humanized nursing, while the latter received routine nursing. Compare FVC and other indicators. Results At the end of intervention, the data of FVC and FEV1 in the experimental group were (3.01±0.29) L and (2.66±0.26) L, respectively, which were higher than those in the control group (2.65±0.27) L and (2.29±0.31) L (P < 0.05). For partial pressure of carbon dioxide and partial pressure of arterial oxygen, at the end of intervention, the data of the experimental group were (40.36±9.25) mmHg and (83.47±14.23) mmHg, respectively, which were better than those of the control group (61.94±11.78) mmHg and (62.59±9.36) mmHg (P < 0.05). Regarding the SF-36 score, at the end of the intervention, the score of the experimental group (87.13±2.65) was higher than that of the control group (81.59±3.04) (P < 0.05). About satisfaction: the data of the experimental group was 97.56%, which was higher than that of the control group (80.49%) (P < 0.05). Conclusion The elderly respiratory failure with humanized nursing, the patients prognosis is better, the pulmonary function and blood gas analysis index improvement is more obvious, the satisfaction is more rapid.

Respiratory failure; Lung function; Humanized nursing; The quality of life